Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
8000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-06-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specific Aims: The specific aims are:
1. Test the effectiveness of three health marketing approaches to motivate high-risk people, identified via 911 responders, to come to a local fire station for hypertension screening. The mailed marketing approaches vary personalized risk information and personalization of source.
2. Test the effectiveness of two mailing interventions (blood pressure kits with and without promotional gifts) to increase blood pressure monitoring among patients who have come to a fire station for a second blood pressure check.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Education Via Phone-based Text Messaging (SMS) on Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension
NCT05711004
Electronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
NCT00158639
Text Messages and Blood Pressure Control
NCT02779231
Telehealth Intervention for Improved Blood Pressure Control With Targeted Incentives
NCT04075045
Young Adult Hypertension Self-Management Clinical Trial
NCT03158051
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
People who see a regular healthcare provider are more likely to know they have hypertension, and they are more likely to receive appropriate treatment. However, many patients who call 9-1-1 for emergency medical services (EMS) do not have regular health care providers and may be more at risk for undiagnosed or under treated disease.
EMS personnel enter the homes of thousands of residents each year. Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) routinely take patients' blood pressure as part of their standard diagnostic procedures. EMTs and paramedics complete a medical incident report form (MIRF) for each patient, including this information. As recorded on the MIRFs, thousands of patients have high blood pressure (defined by a systolic measurement of 160 or higher and/or a diastolic measurement of 100 or higher) during those visits. Blood pressure may be elevated simply from the stress and anxiety of a 9-1-1 response. But even in light of this potential "white coat" phenomenon, blood pressure readings at these levels are very high and are a cause for concern, especially in cases where patients are not transported to the hospital for further examination.
From February - April, 2007 we are collecting baseline data on patients who have high blood pressure readings (160/100 or higher) at a 9-1-1 response by an EMT (SPHERE Hypertension Baseline Data Study). We want to understand what these patients remember during the 9-1-1 response around their high blood pressure measure, if the patients seek a second reading, and if the patients seek follow-up care as a result of the high blood pressure measure. We are also interested to learn if patients trust EMTs as a provider of preventive health care. This baseline data will also allow us to more accurately measure the success of this proposed intervention study. The baseline data collection is almost completed and we now will proceed with an intervention study.
We propose to conduct an intervention study next, aimed at:
* Motivating subjects to receive a follow-up hypertension assessment from an EMT at a local fire station after receiving a high blood pressure reading from an EMT during a 911 event.
* Motivating subjects to monitor their blood pressure as appropriate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
No interventions assigned to this group
2
photo and blood pressure personalization
Personalized brochure
either photo personalization, blood pressure personalization, both, or no personalization
3
photo personalization only
Personalized brochure
either photo personalization, blood pressure personalization, both, or no personalization
4
blood pressure personalization only
Personalized brochure
either photo personalization, blood pressure personalization, both, or no personalization
5
no personalization
Personalized brochure
either photo personalization, blood pressure personalization, both, or no personalization
A
receives gift card in blood pressure (BP) kit
Promotional gift
half of participants who go to a fire station will receive a gift card.
B
does not receive gift card in BP kit
Promotional gift
half of participants who go to a fire station will receive a gift card.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Personalized brochure
either photo personalization, blood pressure personalization, both, or no personalization
Promotional gift
half of participants who go to a fire station will receive a gift card.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Recorded systolic blood pressure \>= 160 and/or diastolic blood pressure \>= 100
* At least 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient nursing home/adult family home resident
* Patient a prisoner or in custody (in jail or at the Regional Justice Center in Kent, for example)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Washington
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hendrika Meischke, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Mickey Eisenberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Meischke H, Ike BR, Fahrenbruch C, Kuniyuki A, Hannon P, Parks MR, Forehand M, Weaver M, Harris JR. Hypertension identification via emergency responders: a randomized controlled intervention study. Prev Med. 2013 Dec;57(6):914-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07-6656-E/G 01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
32168-E/G
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.