Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid for the Treatment of Pathologic (Chronic Moderate to Severe) Drooling in Pediatric Patients 3 to 18 Years of Age With Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurologic Conditions (NCT NCT00491894)

NCT ID: NCT00491894

Last Updated: 2012-07-09

Results Overview

The primary efficacy variable was patient's response status using the change from baseline to Week 24 evaluations of the mTDS assessment. Each patient was classified as a responder or non-responder according to the change in their mean mTDS rating from baseline to Week 24. Responders were patients who had at least a 3-point decrease in mTDS rating from baseline

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

137 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2012-07-09

Participant Flow

First patient was enrolled on April 03, 2007 and last patient completed on May 30, 2008

After a washout and screening period, and 2-day baseline period, patients were enrolled in a 4-week dose titration period which commenced with the goal of identifying an optimal 3 times daily maintenance dose for each patient. The resulting individualized optimal maintenance dose was to be administered for the remainder of the 24-week study

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Overall Study
STARTED
137
Overall Study
COMPLETED
103
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Overall Study
Adverse Event
14
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
5
Overall Study
Death
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
2
Overall Study
Other-Failed to meet any criteria
2
Overall Study
Physician Decision
2
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
Overall Study
Other-Intake of prohibited medication
1

Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid for the Treatment of Pathologic (Chronic Moderate to Severe) Drooling in Pediatric Patients 3 to 18 Years of Age With Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurologic Conditions

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
11.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.35 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
121 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The analysis was done by intention to treat method. For purposes of statistical estimation, patients who dropped out due to lack of efficacy had their worst observation carried forward. Patients who dropped out for reasons other than lack of efficacy had their last observation carried forward

The primary efficacy variable was patient's response status using the change from baseline to Week 24 evaluations of the mTDS assessment. Each patient was classified as a responder or non-responder according to the change in their mean mTDS rating from baseline to Week 24. Responders were patients who had at least a 3-point decrease in mTDS rating from baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)
Missing
7 Participants
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)
Responders
68 Participants
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)
Non-Responders
62 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Parents/caregivers were to complete a 10 cm "Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of Extent of Drooling for the Day" VAS assessment (0 = normal; 10 = extremely wet) to provide an overall assessment of the extent of drooling for that day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
6.56 VAS score
Standard Deviation 2.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Parents/caregivers were to complete a 10 cm "Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of Extent of Drooling for the Day" VAS assessment (0 = normal; 10 = extremely wet) to provide an overall assessment of the extent of drooling for that day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using VAS
3.21 VAS score
Standard Deviation 2.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: The analysis for parent/caregiver's Global Assessment was done by intention to treat method

The parent/caregiver performed an overall evaluation of glycopyrrolate liquid for the treatment of drooling, benefits, and side effects over the duration of the study. The parent/caregiver selected one of the following choices to assess if 'This is a worthwhile treatment': 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree. A dichotomous global assessment was also performed and summarized with the categories 'responder' (strongly agree and agree responses aggregated) and 'non-responder'(neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree responses aggregated)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of Treatment
Responders
101 Participants
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of Treatment
Non-Responders
20 Participants
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of Treatment
Missing
16 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: The analysis for investigator's Global Assessment was done by intention to treat method

The investigator performed an overall evaluation of glycopyrrolate liquid for the treatment of drooling, benefits, and side effects over the duration of the study. The investigator selected one of the following choices to assess if 'This is a worthwhile treatment': 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree. A dichotomous global assessment was also performed and summarized with the categories 'responder' (strongly agree and agree responses aggregated) and 'non-responder' (neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree responses aggregated)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 Participants
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Investigator's Global Assessment of Treatment
Responders
109 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment of Treatment
Non-Responders
18 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment of Treatment
Missing
10 Participants

Adverse Events

Patients With Chronic Drooling

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 122 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 participants at risk
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Nervous system disorders
Nystagmus
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Hydrocephalus
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Anoxic encephalopathy
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Esophageal candidiasis
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar hypertrophy
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired gastric emptying
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal motility disorder
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Therapeutic agent toxicity
0.73%
1/137 • Number of events 1 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
2.2%
3/137 • Number of events 3 • 6 months

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Patients With Chronic Drooling
n=137 participants at risk
A 4-week dose titration period until an optimal individualized response was obtained for each patient or a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose was reached. Doses were not to exceed 3.0 mg/kg TID
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
20.4%
28/137 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
17.5%
24/137 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
17.5%
24/137 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
10.9%
15/137 • 6 months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
8.0%
11/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
7.3%
10/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
8.0%
11/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Influenza
5.1%
7/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
5.1%
7/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
4.4%
6/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
4.4%
6/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
10.9%
15/137 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
5.1%
7/137 • 6 months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract congestion
4.4%
6/137 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
7.3%
10/137 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
5.1%
7/137 • 6 months
Nervous system disorders
Headache
4.4%
6/137 • 6 months
General disorders
Pyrexia
14.6%
20/137 • 6 months
General disorders
Irritability
5.8%
8/137 • 6 months
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
8.0%
11/137 • 6 months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Feeding tube complication
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Vascular disorders
Flushing
10.9%
15/137 • 6 months
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Investigations
Urine output decreased
3.6%
5/137 • 6 months
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
6.6%
9/137 • 6 months

Additional Information

Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator

Shionogi USA

Phone: 800-849-9707

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The sponsor can embargo results from a PI's center until the combined results from the completed study have been published in full or the sponsor confirms there will be no multicenter study publication. Results communications must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication. By written request, the sponsor can extend the embargo up to an additional 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to scientific content and cannot further extend the embargo.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER