Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Utility of Endothelial Dysfunction in PAD (NCT NCT00491751)
NCT ID: NCT00491751
Last Updated: 2018-07-27
Results Overview
Change in flow mediated dilation with treatment: FMD visit 2 - FMD visit 1 FMD is measured by using vascular ultrasound to determine the baseline diameter of the brachial artery. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is induced by 5-minute arterial occlusion with a blood pressure cuff. When the cuff is released, the resultant increase in blood flow (reactive hyperemia) stimulates vasodilation of the brachial artery. This flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is expressed as the percent change from baseline. Healthy individuals typical dysplay a 10 to 12% dilation. Individuals with PAD had markedly impaired dilation of 6-7. The currernt study sought to determine whether a change in FMD would occur following intervention.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
108 participants
1-4 weeks
2018-07-27
Participant Flow
Recruitment: May 2004 to June 2010.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Atorvastatin
Atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg
|
Ascorbic Acid
Ascorbic Acid 500 mg per day
|
Placebo
Placebo atorvastatin and Placebo ascorbic acid
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
44
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
44
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Utility of Endothelial Dysfunction in PAD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Atorvastatin
n=22 Participants
Atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg
|
Ascorbic Acid
n=44 Participants
Ascorbic Acid 500 mg per day
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Placebo atorvastatin and Placebo ascorbic acid
|
Total
n=108 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
|
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
|
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
108 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-4 weeksPopulation: All enrolled subjects were analyzed.
Change in flow mediated dilation with treatment: FMD visit 2 - FMD visit 1 FMD is measured by using vascular ultrasound to determine the baseline diameter of the brachial artery. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is induced by 5-minute arterial occlusion with a blood pressure cuff. When the cuff is released, the resultant increase in blood flow (reactive hyperemia) stimulates vasodilation of the brachial artery. This flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is expressed as the percent change from baseline. Healthy individuals typical dysplay a 10 to 12% dilation. Individuals with PAD had markedly impaired dilation of 6-7. The currernt study sought to determine whether a change in FMD would occur following intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin
n=22 Participants
Atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg
|
Ascorbic Acid
n=44 Participants
Ascorbic Acid 500 mg per day
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Placebo atorvastatin and Placebo ascorbic acid
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in FMD
|
0.88 percent change of FMD
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
0.41 percent change of FMD
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
0.88 percent change of FMD
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 monthsPopulation: For this outcome all participants were stratified into 2 groups: those with, and those without a CVD event (not by treatment group)
This outcome is independent of the treatment group so the groups are 'CVD event' and ' No CVD Event'. Cardiovascular events (CVD) included cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, and unstable angina.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin
n=16 Participants
Atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg
|
Ascorbic Acid
n=92 Participants
Ascorbic Acid 500 mg per day
|
Placebo
Placebo atorvastatin and Placebo ascorbic acid
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in FMD in All Participants With and Without a CVD Event (Not by Treatment Group)
|
0.5 percent change of flow-mediated dilation
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
0.7 percent change of flow-mediated dilation
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Atorvastatin
Ascorbic Acid
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Atorvastatin
n=22 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg
|
Ascorbic Acid
n=44 participants at risk
Ascorbi acid 500 mg \[per day
|
Placebo
n=42 participants at risk
Placebo for atorvastatin and ascorbic acid
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infaction
|
9.1%
2/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
4.5%
2/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
14.3%
6/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Unstable angina
|
0.00%
0/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
7.1%
3/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive heart failure
|
0.00%
0/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
4.5%
2/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
4.8%
2/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
CVA/TIA
|
9.1%
2/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
4.5%
2/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Venticular fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
2.4%
1/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other CVD event
|
4.5%
1/22 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
6.8%
3/44 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
7.1%
3/42 • 2 months
All subjects were followed for 2 months. They were questioned about adverse events and medical records were reviewed.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Naomi M. Hamburg, MD
Boston University School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place