Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (NCT NCT00484939)

NCT ID: NCT00484939

Last Updated: 2015-01-08

Results Overview

Progression-free survival was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All measurable lesions (maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total, those with the longest diameter and suitability for accurate repeated measurements) were identified as target lesions (TL). A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated and reported as the baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

280 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Results posted on

2015-01-08

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Overall Study
STARTED
140
140
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
140
140

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Overall Study
Death
9
13
Overall Study
Adverse Event
22
12
Overall Study
Patient Withdrew Consent
19
10
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
3
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
3
Overall Study
Discretion of Investigator or Sponsor
7
3
Overall Study
Disease progression
67
88
Overall Study
Screen Failure
2
2
Overall Study
Reason Not Specified
11
6

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Total
n=280 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
76.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.18 • n=5 Participants
76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.91 • n=7 Participants
76.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.04 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
168 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

Progression-free survival was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All measurable lesions (maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total, those with the longest diameter and suitability for accurate repeated measurements) were identified as target lesions (TL). A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated and reported as the baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Progression-free Survival
9.1 Months
Interval 7.3 to 11.3
5.1 Months
Interval 4.3 to 6.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study. Only participants with a response were included in the analysis.

BOR was defined as the best response (complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], stable disease \[SD\], progressive disease \[PD\], not evaluable \[NE\], or not assessed \[NA\]) recorded from the start of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Complete Response
2.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.8 to 7.2
1.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 5.1
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Partial Response
17.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.3 to 24.4
8.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 14.5
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Stable Disease
54.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 45.7 to 62.7
48.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.0 to 57.2
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Progressive Disease
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.6 to 16.2
21.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.9 to 29.2
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Not assessed
15.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.1 to 22.8
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.7 to 27.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study. Only participants with a complete response or partial response were included in the analysis.

Duration of response was defined as the time in months from the first confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=28 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=14 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Duration of Response
9.7 Months
Interval 8.3 to 10.9
9.4 Months
Interval 6.2 to 12.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

Time to response was defined as the time in months from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documentation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. Participants who did not have a confirmed response were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment, or if that was unavailable, at the date of the first dose of study medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Time to Response
NA Months
The median and the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated due to insufficient data.
NA Months
Interval 30.4 to
The median and the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated due to insufficient data.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

Overall survival was defined as the time in months from randomization to death from any cause.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Overall Survival
20.7 Months
Interval 16.6 to 26.0
17.0 Months
Interval 12.9 to 22.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the Safety Follow-up which occurred 28 days after the last dose of treatment (up to 5 years 8 months).

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

The ECOG performance status is a scale used to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. The scale ranges from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 indicating death. The 6 categories are 0=Asymptomatic (Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities without restriction), 1=Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature), 2=Symptomatic, \< 50% in bed during the day (Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours), 3=Symptomatic, \> 50% in bed, but not bedbound (Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair 50% or more of waking hours), 4=Bedbound (Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair), 5=Death. Reported is the percentage of participants in each of the 6 ECOG performance status categories.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 0 (n=117,110)
50.4 Percentage of participants
34.5 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 1
47.0 Percentage of participants
58.2 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 2
1.7 Percentage of participants
5.5 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 3
0.9 Percentage of participants
1.8 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 7 ECOG = 5
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 0 (n=88,77)
50.0 Percentage of participants
36.4 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 1
45.5 Percentage of participants
51.9 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 2
3.4 Percentage of participants
11.7 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 3
1.1 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 16 ECOG = 5
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 0 (n=66,42)
43.9 Percentage of participants
45.2 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 1
48.5 Percentage of participants
45.2 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 2
0.0 Percentage of participants
8.3 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 2
6.1 Percentage of participants
9.5 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 3
1.5 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 25 ECOG = 5
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 0 (n=48,24)
39.6 Percentage of participants
33.3 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 1
58.3 Percentage of participants
58.3 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 3
2.1 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Week 34 ECOG = 5
0.0 Percentage of participants
0.0 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 0 (n=89,82)
33.7 Percentage of participants
32.9 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 1
47.2 Percentage of participants
45.1 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 2
12.4 Percentage of participants
14.6 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 3
6.7 Percentage of participants
4.9 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
1.2 Percentage of participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Safety Follow-up ECOG = 5
0.0 Percentage of participants
1.2 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

Reported is the percentage of participants requiring additional treatment for malignancy in the survival follow-up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Percentage of Participants Requiring Additional Treatment for Malignancy
50.7 Percentage of participants
49.3 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All participants randomized into the study.

Duration of follow-up is defined as the time in days from randomization until disease progression or death, or time to censoring for overall survival.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=140 Participants
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Duration of Follow-up
540.5 Days
Standard Deviation 423.52
479.2 Days
Standard Deviation 401.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Throughout study

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Bevacizumab + Capecitabine

Serious events: 40 serious events
Other events: 129 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Capecitabine

Serious events: 42 serious events
Other events: 130 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=136 participants at risk
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
2.2%
3/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
2.2%
3/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.5%
2/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.2%
3/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic obstruction
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mechanical ileus
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
6.0%
8/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Pyrexia
2.2%
3/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Pain
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Death
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Oedema
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
2.2%
3/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary sepsis
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis gangrenous
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Amnesia
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischaemia
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
1.5%
2/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
1.5%
2/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.2%
3/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery thrombosis
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Vena cava thrombosis
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Impacted fracture
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic neoplasm
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to lung
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus ureteric
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Eye disorders
Amaurosis fugax
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Female genital tract fistula
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash macular
0.75%
1/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Surgical and medical procedures
Bone operation
0.00%
0/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. In addition, participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Capecitabine
n=136 participants at risk
Participants received capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
40.3%
54/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
35.3%
48/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
23.9%
32/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
27.2%
37/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
23.1%
31/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
15.4%
21/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
20.9%
28/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
11.8%
16/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
18.7%
25/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
14.0%
19/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
10.4%
14/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.3%
14/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
8.2%
11/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.7%
5/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
6.7%
9/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Fatigue
23.9%
32/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
27.2%
37/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Asthenia
22.4%
30/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
16.2%
22/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Pyrexia
17.9%
24/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
11.8%
16/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
14.9%
20/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.1%
11/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
8.2%
11/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.5%
17/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Pain
8.2%
11/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.4%
6/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-Plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
49.3%
66/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
39.7%
54/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin hyperpigmentation
8.2%
11/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
6.0%
8/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
4.5%
6/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.8%
12/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
9.0%
12/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
11.0%
15/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
7.5%
10/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.7%
5/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
6.7%
9/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.5%
17/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
6.0%
8/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.4%
6/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
6.0%
8/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
17.2%
23/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.7%
5/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
11.2%
15/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.8%
12/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
9.0%
12/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.6%
13/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
6.7%
9/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
6.0%
8/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Appetite
28.4%
38/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
22.8%
31/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
9.7%
13/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.1%
11/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
9.0%
12/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
8.2%
11/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.7%
5/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
7.5%
10/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.9%
4/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
16.4%
22/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.4%
6/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
5.2%
7/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.1%
7/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
7.5%
10/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.74%
1/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
5.2%
7/134
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/136
Safety population: All participants who had at least 1 dose of study medication.

Additional Information

Medical Communications

Hoffmann-La Roche

Phone: 800 821-8590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER