Trial Outcomes & Findings for MK0431A Comparative Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (0431A-079)(COMPLETED) (NCT NCT00482729)

NCT ID: NCT00482729

Last Updated: 2017-06-09

Results Overview

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

1246 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and Week 18

Results posted on

2017-06-09

Participant Flow

First Patient In: 26-Jun-2007; Last Patient Last Visit for end of study: 28-Apr-2009; Two-hundred four medical clinics in the United States (US) and 5 in Puerto Rico.

Patients 18-78 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c \[A1C\] \>7.5% at screening visit) who were appropriate for treatment with oral antihyperglycemic therapy and had not been on an anti-hyperglycemic agent (AHA) in the last 4 months were eligible to participate.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Overall Study
STARTED
626
624
Overall Study
Completed Phase A
484
482
Overall Study
Completed Phase B
409
406
Overall Study
COMPLETED
409
406
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
217
218

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
29
33
Overall Study
Creatinine/Creatinine Clearance Criteria
0
2
Overall Study
Hyperglycemia Criteria
7
5
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
4
16
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
86
66
Overall Study
Physician Decision
10
7
Overall Study
Pregnancy
4
2
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
10
18
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
67
69

Baseline Characteristics

MK0431A Comparative Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (0431A-079)(COMPLETED)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=625 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=621 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Total
n=1246 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
50.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=7 Participants
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
272 Participants
n=5 Participants
266 Participants
n=7 Participants
538 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
353 Participants
n=5 Participants
355 Participants
n=7 Participants
708 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
82 Participants
n=5 Participants
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
508 Participants
n=5 Participants
489 Participants
n=7 Participants
997 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
9.91 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83 • n=5 Participants
9.83 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 • n=7 Participants
9.87 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.80 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 18

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study therapy, had a baseline value and ≥ 1 post-baseline value for this outcome. Data after initiation of additional AHA were treated as missing. For FAS with no data at Week 18, the last post-baseline observed measurement was carried forward to Week 18.

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=559 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=564 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 18
-2.37 Percent
Interval -2.49 to -2.24
-1.76 Percent
Interval -1.88 to -1.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 18

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study therapy, had a baseline value and ≥1 post-baseline value for this outcome. Data after initiation of additional AHA were treated as missing. For FAS with no data at Week 18, the last post-baseline observed measurement was carried forward to Week 18.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=559 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=564 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Number of Patients With A1C < 7.0% at Week 18
Patients with A1C <7.0% at Week 18
275 Participants
193 Participants
Number of Patients With A1C < 7.0% at Week 18
Patients with A1C ≥7.0% at Week 18
284 Participants
371 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 18

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least 1dose of double-blind study therapy, had a baseline value and ≥1 post-baseline value for this outcome. Data after initiation of additional AHA were treated as missing. For FAS with no data at Week 18, the last post-baseline observed measurement was carried forward to Week 18.

FPG is measured as mg/dL. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG mg/dL minus the Week 0 FPG mg/dL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=560 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=566 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 18
-69.4 mg/dL
Interval -74.1 to -64.6
-53.7 mg/dL
Interval -58.4 to -48.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 44

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study therapy, had a baseline value and ≥1 post-baseline value for this outcome. Data after initiation of additional AHA were included. For FAS with no data at Week 44, the last post-baseline observed measurement was carried forward to Week 44.

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 44 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=560 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=569 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 44
-2.25 Percent
Interval -2.38 to -2.12
-1.77 Percent
Interval -1.89 to -1.64

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 44

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least 1dose of double-blind study therapy, had a baseline value and ≥1 post-baseline value for this outcome. Data after initiation of additional AHA were included. For FAS with no data at Week 44, the last post-baseline observed measurement was carried forward to Week 44.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=560 Participants
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=569 Participants
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Number of Patients With A1C < 7.0% at Week 44
Patients with A1C <7.0% at Week 44
258 Participants
173 Participants
Number of Patients With A1C < 7.0% at Week 44
Patients with A1C ≥7.0% at Week 44
302 Participants
396 Participants

Adverse Events

Sita/Met FDC

Serious events: 28 serious events
Other events: 173 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Metformin

Serious events: 38 serious events
Other events: 185 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=625 participants at risk
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=621 participants at risk
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Cardiac disorders
Any Cardiac Disorders
0.80%
5/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.97%
6/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.48%
3/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Any Gastrointestinal Disorders
0.32%
2/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
General disorders
Any General Disorders and Administration site Conditions
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.48%
3/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
General disorders
Electrocution
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Any Hepatobiliary disorders
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Any Infections and Infestations
0.96%
6/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.97%
6/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis infectious
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis C
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia streptococcal
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Any Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications
0.32%
2/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pneumothorax traumatic
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fractured base
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Any Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic foot
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Any Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
0.48%
3/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.81%
5/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial cancer metastatic
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Laryngeal cancer
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma metastatic
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian adenoma
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer metastatic
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Any Nervous System Disorders
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.81%
5/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery disease
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Any Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Psychiatric disorders
Any Psychiatric Disorders
0.32%
2/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.48%
3/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Any Renal and Urinary Disorders
0.32%
2/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.32%
2/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Neurogenic bladder
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Postrenal failure
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Any Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders
0.48%
3/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Any Vascular Disorders
0.32%
2/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.64%
4/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Aneurysm
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
0.16%
1/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.00%
0/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
0.00%
0/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
0.16%
1/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Sita/Met FDC
n=625 participants at risk
The Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed Dose Combination (Sita/Met FDC) group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of Sita/Met initiated at a dose of 50/500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 50/1000 mg b.i.d.; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Metformin
n=621 participants at risk
The Metformin group includes data from patients randomized to receive treatment with oral tablets of metformin initiated at a dose of 500 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) The dose was to have been up-titrated over 4 weeks to 1000 mg b.i.d. ; however, patients could stay in the study on a minimum dose of Sita/Met 50/500 mg b.i.d. if a higher dose was not tolerated.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Any Gastrointestinal Disorders
17.1%
107/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
21.9%
136/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
13.8%
86/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
18.0%
112/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
5.9%
37/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
7.1%
44/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Any Infections and infestations
9.9%
62/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
9.2%
57/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
5.3%
33/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
4.2%
26/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
4.8%
30/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
5.0%
31/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Any Nervous system disorders
5.6%
35/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
3.7%
23/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
5.6%
35/625 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.
3.7%
23/621 • Week 0 through Week 44
1 patient in the Sita/Met FDC group and 3 patients in the Metformin group from Site 079011301, which was identified as non-compliant with some of the requirements of Good Clinical Practice. For this reason, data from all four randomized patients at this site were deemed unreliable and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analysis.

Additional Information

Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Phone: 1-800-672-6372

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Merck agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Merck supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER