Compare Perceptions and Satisfaction for Two Different Delivery Mechanisms for Etanercept
NCT ID: NCT00482170
Last Updated: 2012-03-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
421 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Arm 1: Enbrel 50 mg Prefilled Syringe
Enbrel (etanercept)
Arm 1 = Enbrel 50 mg Prefilled Syringe twice weekly
2
Arm 2 Enbrel 50 mg Autoinjector
Etanercept
Arm 2 = Enbrel 50 mg Autoinjector twice weekly
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Enbrel (etanercept)
Arm 1 = Enbrel 50 mg Prefilled Syringe twice weekly
Etanercept
Arm 2 = Enbrel 50 mg Autoinjector twice weekly
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eligible for treatment with etanercept according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and applicable local guidelines.
* Aged 18 years or more
* Willing and able to self-inject etanercept.
* Able to store test drug at 2-8oC.
* Negative serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) pregnancy test at baseline (week 0) for all women of childbearing potential. Sexually active women of childbearing potential must use a medically acceptable form of contraception. Medically acceptable forms of contraception include oral contraceptives, injectable or implantable methods, intrauterine devices, or properly used barrier contraception. Sexually active men must agree to use a reliable form of contraception during the study.
* Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed.
Exclusion Criteria
* Sepsis or risk of sepsis.
* Current or recent infections, including chronic or localized.
* Latex sensitivity.
* Vaccination with live vaccine in last 4 weeks, or expected to require such vaccination during the course of the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Monitor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bruges, , Belgium
Brussels, , Belgium
Brussels, , Belgium
Edegem, , Belgium
Ghent, , Belgium
Hasselt, , Belgium
Kapellen, , Belgium
Liège, , Belgium
Hellerup, , Denmark
Hørsholm, , Denmark
Roskilde, , Denmark
Helsinki, , Finland
Helsinki, , Finland
Joensuu, , Finland
Tampere, , Finland
Le Mans, Cedex, France
Limoges, , France
Montpellier, , France
Nancy, , France
Nantes, , France
Paris, , France
Pessac, , France
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Reims, , France
Toulouse, , France
Augsburg, , Germany
Berlin, , Germany
Berlin, , Germany
Bonn, , Germany
Cologne, , Germany
Dresden, , Germany
Dülmen, , Germany
Erlangen, , Germany
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Göttingen, , Germany
Greifswald, , Germany
Hamburg, , Germany
Lübeck, , Germany
Mainz, , Germany
Mannheim, , Germany
München, , Germany
Münster, , Germany
Tübingen, , Germany
Wiesbaden, , Germany
Würzburg, , Germany
Würzburg, , Germany
Athens, , Greece
Athens, , Greece
Ioannina, , Greece
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Szeged, , Hungary
S. Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
Terracina, Latina, Italy
Gallarate, Varese, Italy
Capranica, Viterbo, Italy
Bologna, , Italy
Como, , Italy
Milan, , Italy
Napoli, , Italy
Napoli, , Italy
Padua, , Italy
Pisa, , Italy
Breda, , Netherlands
Flushing, , Netherlands
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Bergen, , Norway
Stavanger, , Norway
Tromsø, , Norway
Elche, Alicante, Spain
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Córdoba, , Spain
Granada, , Spain
Madrid, , Spain
Valencia, , Spain
Danderyd, , Sweden
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Linköping, , Sweden
Malmo, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0881A6-3326
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id