A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy

NCT ID: NCT00477295

Last Updated: 2015-12-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

583 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. The subjects will be randomized to either the carbamazepine or zonisamide arm at the Randomization Visit (T1). T1 must occur as soon as possible (and at least within 14 days) of the Screening Visit in order to optimize subject care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Zonisamide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Zonisamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.

Carbamazepine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carbamazepine

Intervention Type DRUG

Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Zonisamide

Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.

Intervention Type DRUG

Carbamazepine

Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zonegran

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female subjects, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive.
2. Subjects with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy having at least two well documented, unprovoked, clinically evaluated and classified partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, of which at least one seizure occurred within three months of the Screening Visit (\> one seizure within a 24 hour period will be counted as one seizure).
3. Subjects will either have had no previous use of an AED, or treatment with one AED for a maximum duration of two weeks before the Randomization Visit (T1).
4. Subjects have a documented electroencephalogram (EEG) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, compatible with localization-related epilepsy (to exclude primary generalized epilepsy).
5. Subjects have a documented computed axial tomography (CAT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan confirming the absence of a progressive neurological lesion within 12 months of the Screening Visit.
6. Female subjects without childbearing potential (two years post-menopausal, bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation, complete hysterectomy) are eligible. Female subjects with childbearing potential must not be pregnant as confirmed by a negative pregnancy test at screening and randomization, must not be lactating and must be using a medically acceptable form of contraception, for the duration of the study and for one month following discontinuation of the study drug. Medically acceptable contraception is defined here as oral contraception pill with at least 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol per intake, contraceptive injections and implants, or intrauterine device in place for at least three months.
7. Subjects who are able and willing to follow investigational study procedures, maintain a seizure diary, and report AEs.
8. Subjects who are able and willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects have a history of clinical investigations, including EEG data, that are suggestive of idiopathic generalised epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
2. Subjects with a history of absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures.
3. Subjects have a history of status epilepticus, and/or non-epileptic seizures (e.g., metabolic, pseudo-seizures).
4. Subjects have experienced seizures relating to drugs, alcohol, acute medical illness, mental retardation, or subjects with situation-related seizures.
5. Subjects have progressive encephalopathy or findings consistent with progressive CNS disease or lesion (e.g. infection, demyelination, or tumour).
6. Subjects have a history of a significant or currently uncontrolled disease that will interfere with the conduct of this study or the assessment of safety and efficacy of the study drug.
7. Subjects have been previously treated with carbamazepine or zonisamide.
8. Subjects have received an investigational drug or device in the three months prior to the Screening Visit.
9. Subjects have a known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides, dibenzazepine derivatives, or tricyclic antidepressants.
10. Subjects have a history of bone marrow depression, low platelet count or other blood dyscrasia.
11. Subjects have a history of acute intermittent porphyria.
12. Subjects have a history of renal disorder (serum creatinine level of \> 135 ìmol / l (1.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit), hepatic disorder or clinically significant abnormal liver function tests; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2 times the upper normal limit.
13. Subjects have a body weight of less than 40 kg.
14. Subjects have a history of progressive malignancy within the previous 5 years (excluding a history of non-metastasized and adequately treated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma).
15. Subjects have a history of psychiatric illness or mood disorder requiring electro-convulsive or drug therapy within the previous 6 months which is considered uncontrolled; a history of suicide attempt; alcohol or drug abuse; chronic treatment with benzodiazepines or barbiturates.
16. Subjects are currently taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
17. Subjects have a history of pancreatitis, nephrolithiasis or hypercalcuria, clinically significant laboratory or electro-cardiographic abnormalities, or uncontrolled hypertension.
18. Subjects are currently taking mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or any other excluded medications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joanna Segieth

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eisai Limited

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, , Australia

Site Status

Flinders, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg West, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Queensland, , Australia

Site Status

Wellington, , Australia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Béthune, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Westerstede, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Hódmezővásárhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyregyhaza, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg-Pozva, , Hungary

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Koturpuram, , India

Site Status

Madurai, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Orbassano, , Italy

Site Status

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Sosnowiec, , Poland

Site Status

Szcecin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Kaliningrad, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Subotica, , Serbia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratslava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Brezno, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nové Zámky, , Slovakia

Site Status

Vranov nad Topľou, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Sandton, , South Africa

Site Status

Anyang, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Wŏnju, , South Korea

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Bacelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Yongkang District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Treliske, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary India Italy Poland Russia Serbia Slovakia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baulac M, Brodie MJ, Patten A, Segieth J, Giorgi L. Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jul;11(7):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70105-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22683226 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-000156-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E2090-E044-310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id