Citalopram in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT00477165

Last Updated: 2017-04-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypotheses:

1. Primary null hypothesis: The rate of clinical response, assessed as patient-reported global symptom rating and "adequate relief of IBS symptoms," does not differ between non-depressed IBS patients treated with the SSRI citalopram and patients treated with placebo.
2. Secondary null hypotheses:

1. Changes in disease-related quality of life, assessed with the IBS-QOL instrument, do not differ between patients treated with the SSRI citalopram and patients treated with placebo.
2. Changes in rectosigmoid visceral sensitivity, assessed by barostat balloon distention, do not differ between patients treated with the SSRI citalopram and patients treated with placebo.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects an estimated 15 million Americans at a cost of $1.7 billion per year. Visceral hypersensitivity is present in many patients with IBS, but its contribution to clinical symptoms is unclear. Tricyclic antidepressants may be beneficial in IBS, but their side effects can be unacceptable. Because they are better tolerated, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often used to treat IBS, but their efficacy in IBS has not been examined in controlled studies. We propose a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of SSRI treatment in IBS. Non-depressed patients will be studied in order to assess SSRI effects on IBS independent of depression. Our specific aims are: 1) To determine whether the SSRI citalopram is superior to placebo in improving clinical symptoms, disease-related quality of life, and tolerance to rectal balloon distension; 2) To assess whether symptomatic improvement is correlated with improvement in quality of life and/or visceral sensitivity. Subjects will fulfill Rome II IBS criteria, will have normal screening studies, and will not be depressed or on antidepressants. Global and specific symptoms, and satisfaction will be rated daily during a 1-week baseline. Subjects will then be randomized in concealed, double-blind fashion to citalopram or placebo, will complete the validated IBS-QOL instrument, and will undergo rectal compliance and sensory testing with a barostat. Subjects will be treated and will rate symptoms and satisfaction weekly for a total of 8 weeks, and also daily during the final week for comparison with the baseline. At study end, subjects will again complete the IBS-QOL and undergo a barostat study. For the primary outcome, we estimate that to detect a standardized effect size of 0.9 in global symptom rating with 2-sided α=0.05 and β=0.1, 54 subjects are needed. We plan to enroll 60 subjects, which will allow detection of an odds ratio for response (adequate relief) of 4.5 with 2-sided α=0.05 and β=0.2. If the odds ratio for this dichotomous outcome is smaller, this study will provide pilot data for a larger trial. Clinical symptoms are expected to fluctuate. Even if citalopram is not superior to placebo, prospectively collected data will illuminate the relationship between symptoms and visceral sensitivity, and the placebo effect.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Citalopram

One 20mg capsule per day for 4 weeks, then 2 capsules per day (40mg) for 4 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Citalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

20mg/day for 4 weeks, then 40 mg/day for 4 weeks

Placebo

Identical to citalopram 20mg capsule. One capsule per day for 4 weeks, then 2 capsules per day for 4 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Identical to citalopram 20mg capsules; 1 capsule/day for 4 weeks, then 2 capsules/day for 4 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Citalopram

20mg/day for 4 weeks, then 40 mg/day for 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Identical to citalopram 20mg capsules; 1 capsule/day for 4 weeks, then 2 capsules/day for 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Celexa Cipramil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Fulfilling Rome II IBS definition;
2. Age ≥18 yrs and able to give informed consent;
3. Normal sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy or barium enema within 5 years, normal complete blood count and thyroid studies, and negative stool ova and parasite exam for patients with diarrhea.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Current psychiatric diagnosis or active treatment with antidepressants;
2. Pregnancy;
3. Major systemic illness, or illness that could explain IBS-like symptoms;
4. Active IBS therapy other than fiber or loperamide.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Uri Ladabaum

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Uri Ladabaum, M.D., M.S.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H10539-18502

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IQP-CL-101 in IBS Management
NCT01774825 COMPLETED PHASE3
Efficacy and Safety of SYN-010 in IBS-C
NCT03763175 TERMINATED PHASE2
Treatment of Functional Bowel Disorders
NCT00006157 COMPLETED PHASE3