A Study Testing the Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT00475852

Last Updated: 2013-03-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

7141 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find out if nesiritide (a human B-type natriuretic peptide/hBNP) as compared to placebo, plus the usual treatment for acute decompensated heart failure, helps to improve breathing difficulties, reduce heart failure readmissions to hospitals, and helps patients live longer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF) is the inability of the heart to pump efficiently, which can result in symptoms like shortness of breath at rest or with minimal activity. ADHF is a condition in which the heart cannot perform the necessary circulation of blood through the body. This is a randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the doctor knows whether the patient is assigned to receive study drug or placebo \[does not contain study drug\]), placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study of the effectiveness of nesiritide administered continuously through a vein for a minimum of 24 hours up to a maximum of 7 days. The study hypothesis is that nesiritide given in addition to standard care is superior to placebo given in addition to standard care as measured by relief of breathing difficulties (by patient evaluation utilizing a breathlessness scale) at 6 hours or 24 hours after nesiritide administration, and reduction in rehospitalization due to heart failure and death from study drug administration through Day 30. The study drug (nesiritide) or placebo dose being studied is 0.010 mcg/kg/min with or without a 2 mcg/kg initial bolus (one time injection) of nesiritide. Patient safety will be monitored throughout the study through physical exams, vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and temperature), blood tests, and side effects. The patients assigned to the nesiritide group will receive a continuous intravenous (into a vein) infusion at 0.010 mcg/kg/min of nesiritide with or without a 2 mcg/kg bolus (one time injection). The patients assigned to the placebo group will receive matching placebo bolus and infusion. The bolus is given over one minute and the continuous infusion is given for at least 24 hours and up to 7 days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Decompensation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

001

Nesiritide 0.01 mcg/kg/min intravenous (IV) infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hours (hrs)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nesiritide

Intervention Type DRUG

0.01 mcg/kg/min IV infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hrs

002

Placebo matching placebo infusion:0.01 mcg/kg/min IV infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hrs

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

matching placebo infusion:0.01 mcg/kg/min IV infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hrs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nesiritide

0.01 mcg/kg/min IV infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hrs

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

matching placebo infusion:0.01 mcg/kg/min IV infusion (with or without 2 mcg/kg bolus) for 24 to 168 hrs

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Hospitalized for the management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) or diagnosed with ADHF within 48 hours after being hospitalized for another reason; Diagnosis of ADHF is defined as dyspnea (difficulty breathing) at rest or dyspnea with minimal activity.

Exclusion Criteria

At high risk for hypotension (low blood pressure); Acute coronary syndrome as primary diagnosis; History of cardiac valvular stenosis, restrictive cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or pericardial tamponade; Previous enrollment in a nesiritide study; Persistent, uncontrolled hypertension (SBP \[systolic blood pressure\] \>180 mmHg).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scios, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scios, Inc. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Scios, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Culver City, California, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Inglewood, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Inverness, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Downers Grove, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Hinsdale, Illinois, United States

Site Status

La Grange, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mokena, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Danville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Edgewood, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Randallstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brighton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Pontiac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Papillion, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Manchester, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Elmer, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Turnersville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Elmhurst, New York, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Parke, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Roslyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Saratoga Springs, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Garfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mansfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Midwest City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Beaver, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Winchester, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Bedford, , Australia

Site Status

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Concord, , Australia

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Elizabeth Vale, , Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Launceston, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Recife, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro-Rj, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Lakeland, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cornwall, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Scarborough Village, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Terrebonne, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago Rm, , Chile

Site Status

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing Prc, , China

Site Status

Guangdong Province, , China

Site Status

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Jinan, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Xi'an, , China

Site Status

Barranquilla, , Colombia

Site Status

Bogotá Dc, , Colombia

Site Status

Floridablanca, , Colombia

Site Status

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Thionville Cedex N/A, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Brandenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Lüdenscheid, , Germany

Site Status

Neuruppin, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Thessalonikis, , Greece

Site Status

Volos, , Greece

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Bengaluru, , India

Site Status

Coimbatore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Nagpur, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Vadodara, , India

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius Lt, , Lithuania

Site Status

Johor Bahru, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Sinaloa, , Mexico

Site Status

Zapopan, , Mexico

Site Status

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

Delft, , Netherlands

Site Status

Gorinchem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leeuwarden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hastings, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lower Hutt, , New Zealand

Site Status

Nelson, , New Zealand

Site Status

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, , Poland

Site Status

Skierniewice, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Chungcheongbuk-Do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Mykolayiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnitsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia France Germany Greece India Israel Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Russia Singapore South Korea Sweden Taiwan Thailand Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gui H, Tang WHW, Francke S, Li J, She R, Bazeley P, Pereira NL, Adams K, Luzum JA, Connolly TM, Hernandez AF, McNaughton CD, Williams LK, Lanfear DE. Common Variants on FGD5 Increase Hazard of Mortality or Rehospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure From the ASCEND-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Sep;16(9):e010438. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010438. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37725680 (View on PubMed)

Cosiano MF, Vista A, Sun JL, Alhanti B, Harrington J, Butler J, Starling RC, Mentz RJ, Greene SJ. Comparing New York Heart Association Class and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Jan;16(1):e010107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010107. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36314126 (View on PubMed)

Blumer V, Mentz RJ, Sun JL, Butler J, Metra M, Voors AA, Hernandez AF, O'Connor CM, Greene SJ. Prognostic Role of Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Patients Hospitalized for Worsening Chronic Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;14(4):e007871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007871. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33775110 (View on PubMed)

Greene SJ, DeVore AD, Sheng S, Fonarow GC, Butler J, Califf RM, Hernandez AF, Matsouaka RA, Samman Tahhan A, Thomas KL, Vaduganathan M, Yancy CW, Peterson ED, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Representativeness of a Heart Failure Trial by Race and Sex: Results From ASCEND-HF and GWTG-HF. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;7(11):980-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31606362 (View on PubMed)

Greene SJ, Hernandez AF, Sun JL, Butler J, Armstrong PW, Ezekowitz JA, Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Coles A, Metra M, Voors AA, Califf RM, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Relationship Between Enrolling Country Income Level and Patient Profile, Protocol Completion, and Trial End Points. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Oct;11(10):e004783. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004783.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30354576 (View on PubMed)

Verma AK, Sun JL, Hernandez A, Teerlink JR, Schulte PJ, Ezekowitz J, Voors A, Starling R, Armstrong P, O'Conner CM, Mentz RJ. Rate pressure product and the components of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from ASCEND-HF. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):945-952. doi: 10.1002/clc.22981. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29781109 (View on PubMed)

Bhatt AS, Cooper LB, Ambrosy AP, Clare RM, Coles A, Joyce E, Krishnamoorthy A, Butler J, Felker GM, Ezekowitz JA, Armstrong PW, Hernandez AF, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Interaction of Body Mass Index on the Association Between N-Terminal-Pro-b-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Findings From ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure). J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 3;7(3):e006740. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006740.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29431103 (View on PubMed)

Greene SJ, Hernandez AF, Dunning A, Ambrosy AP, Armstrong PW, Butler J, Cerbin LP, Coles A, Ezekowitz JA, Metra M, Starling RC, Teerlink JR, Voors AA, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Hospitalization for Recently Diagnosed Versus Worsening Chronic Heart Failure: From the ASCEND-HF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 27;69(25):3029-3039. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.043.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28641792 (View on PubMed)

Greene SJ, Hernandez AF, Sun JL, Metra M, Butler J, Ambrosy AP, Ezekowitz JA, Starling RC, Teerlink JR, Schulte PJ, Voors AA, Armstrong PW, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Influence of Clinical Trial Site Enrollment on Patient Characteristics, Protocol Completion, and End Points: Insights From the ASCEND-HF Trial (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure). Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Sep;9(9):e002986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.002986.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27623769 (View on PubMed)

Ezekowitz JA, Podder M, Hernandez AF, Armstrong PW, Starling RC, O'Connor CM, Califf RM. Arrival by ambulance in acute heart failure: insights into the mode of presentation from Acute Studies of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF). BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010201.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26988350 (View on PubMed)

Abualnaja S, Podder M, Hernandez AF, McMurray JJ, Starling RC, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Armstrong PW, Ezekowitz JA. Acute Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 24;4(8):e002092. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002092.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26304935 (View on PubMed)

Patel PA, Heizer G, O'Connor CM, Schulte PJ, Dickstein K, Ezekowitz JA, Armstrong PW, Hasselblad V, Mills RM, McMurray JJ, Starling RC, Tang WH, Califf RM, Hernandez AF. Hypotension during hospitalization for acute heart failure is independently associated with 30-day mortality: findings from ASCEND-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;7(6):918-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000872. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25281655 (View on PubMed)

van Deursen VM, Hernandez AF, Stebbins A, Hasselblad V, Ezekowitz JA, Califf RM, Gottlieb SS, O'Connor CM, Starling RC, Tang WH, McMurray JJ, Dickstein K, Voors AA. Nesiritide, renal function, and associated outcomes during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure: results from the Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide and Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF). Circulation. 2014 Sep 16;130(12):958-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003046. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25074507 (View on PubMed)

Kaul P, Reed SD, Hernandez AF, Howlett JG, Ezekowitz JA, Li Y, Zheng Y, Rouleau JL, Starling RC, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Armstrong PW. Differences in treatment, outcomes, and quality of life among patients with heart failure in Canada and the United States. JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;1(6):523-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24622005 (View on PubMed)

Toma M, Ezekowitz JA, Bakal JA, O'Connor CM, Hernandez AF, Sardar MR, Zolty R, Massie BM, Swedberg K, Armstrong PW, Starling RC. The relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality in patients with acute heart failure: insights from the ASCEND-HF Trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Mar;16(3):334-41. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.19. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24464687 (View on PubMed)

Reed SD, Kaul P, Li Y, Eapen ZJ, Davidson-Ray L, Schulman KA, Massie BM, Armstrong PW, Starling RC, O'Connor CM, Hernandez AF, Califf RM. Medical resource use, costs, and quality of life in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: findings from ASCEND-HF. J Card Fail. 2013 Sep;19(9):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.07.003.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24054337 (View on PubMed)

Howlett JG, Ezekowitz JA, Podder M, Hernandez AF, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Dunlap ME, Corbalan R, Armstrong PW, Starling RC, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Fonarow GC; ASCEND-HF Investigators. Global variation in quality of care among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure in an international trial: findings from the acute study clinical effectiveness of nesiritide in decompensated heart failure trial (ASCEND-HF). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):534-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000119. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23899930 (View on PubMed)

Eapen ZJ, Reed SD, Li Y, Kociol RD, Armstrong PW, Starling RC, McMurray JJ, Massie BM, Swedberg K, Ezekowitz JA, Fonarow GC, Teerlink JR, Metra M, Whellan DJ, O'Connor CM, Califf RM, Hernandez AF. Do countries or hospitals with longer hospital stays for acute heart failure have lower readmission rates?: Findings from ASCEND-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jul;6(4):727-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000265. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23770519 (View on PubMed)

Ezekowitz JA, Hu J, Delgado D, Hernandez AF, Kaul P, Leader R, Proulx G, Virani S, White M, Zieroth S, O'Connor C, Westerhout CM, Armstrong PW. Acute heart failure: perspectives from a randomized trial and a simultaneous registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Nov;5(6):735-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.968974. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23032196 (View on PubMed)

Ezekowitz JA, Hernandez AF, O'Connor CM, Starling RC, Proulx G, Weiss MH, Bakal JA, Califf RM, McMurray JJ, Armstrong PW. Assessment of dyspnea in acute decompensated heart failure: insights from ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) on the contributions of peak expiratory flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 17;59(16):1441-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.061.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22497823 (View on PubMed)

O'Connor CM, Starling RC, Hernandez AF, Armstrong PW, Dickstein K, Hasselblad V, Heizer GM, Komajda M, Massie BM, McMurray JJ, Nieminen MS, Reist CJ, Rouleau JL, Swedberg K, Adams KF Jr, Anker SD, Atar D, Battler A, Botero R, Bohidar NR, Butler J, Clausell N, Corbalan R, Costanzo MR, Dahlstrom U, Deckelbaum LI, Diaz R, Dunlap ME, Ezekowitz JA, Feldman D, Felker GM, Fonarow GC, Gennevois D, Gottlieb SS, Hill JA, Hollander JE, Howlett JG, Hudson MP, Kociol RD, Krum H, Laucevicius A, Levy WC, Mendez GF, Metra M, Mittal S, Oh BH, Pereira NL, Ponikowski P, Tang WH, Tanomsup S, Teerlink JR, Triposkiadis F, Troughton RW, Voors AA, Whellan DJ, Zannad F, Califf RM. Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 7;365(1):32-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100171.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21732835 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://filehosting.pharmacm.com/DownloadService.ashx?client=CTR_JNJ_6051&studyid=970&filename=CR013954_REF.pdf

A study testing the effectiveness of Nesiritide in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ASCEND-HF

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

A093

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NATRECORAHF3002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR013954

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Nesiritide in Diastolic Heart Failure.
NCT00309868 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2