Trial Outcomes & Findings for Correction of Farsightedness in Children Study (NCT NCT00472212)
NCT ID: NCT00472212
Last Updated: 2023-04-18
Results Overview
The Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) was used to measure change in reading skill (reading comprehension). The K-TEA is a well-established, individually administered, standardized test for assessment of achievement in reading, with a mean standard score of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher values represent better performance.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
6 week outcome exam
2023-04-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
Spectacles with hyperopic lenses
Spectacles: Hyperopic spectacle lenses
|
Control
Spectacles with placebo lenses
Control: Plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
31
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
Spectacles with hyperopic lenses
Spectacles: Hyperopic spectacle lenses
|
Control
Spectacles with placebo lenses
Control: Plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
n=31 Participants
Spectacles with hyperopic lenses
Spectacles: Hyperopic spectacle lenses
|
Control
n=27 Participants
Spectacles with placebo lenses
Control: Plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
Total
n=58 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78 • n=31 Participants
|
7.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47 • n=27 Participants
|
7.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=58 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=58 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
18 Participants
n=30 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
35 Participants
n=57 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
8 Participants
n=30 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
9 Participants
n=27 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
17 Participants
n=57 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
4 Participants
n=30 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
5 Participants
n=57 Participants • One subject with race /ethnicity not reported
|
|
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score
|
95.17 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47 • n=29 Participants • Test results not available for two subjects.
|
97.07 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38 • n=27 Participants • Test results not available for two subjects.
|
96.09 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34 • n=56 Participants • Test results not available for two subjects.
|
|
Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Score
|
97.83 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.09 • n=29 Participants • Test results not available for 2 subjects.
|
101.96 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.52 • n=27 Participants • Test results not available for 2 subjects.
|
99.82 units on a scale (standard score)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.25 • n=56 Participants • Test results not available for 2 subjects.
|
|
Accommodative Response by monocular estimation method (MEM)
|
0.71 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42 • n=31 Participants
|
0.67 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45 • n=27 Participants
|
0.69 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43 • n=58 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 week outcome examThe Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) was used to measure change in reading skill (reading comprehension). The K-TEA is a well-established, individually administered, standardized test for assessment of achievement in reading, with a mean standard score of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher values represent better performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
n=24 Participants
Glasses with hyperopic lenses (Correction)
|
Control
n=23 Participants
Glasses with placebo lenses
Control: Glasses with plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) Reading Comprehension Score as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)
|
-2.92 score on a scale
Interval -7.9 to 2.1
|
0.088 score on a scale
Interval -5.0 to 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 week outcome examIndividually administered battery designed to measure cognitive processing abilities. CAS is based on PASS (Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive), a well-researched cognitive/neuropsychological theory. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
n=24 Participants
Glasses with hyperopic lenses (Correction)
|
Control
n=23 Participants
Glasses with placebo lenses
Control: Glasses with plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Attention Scores as Measured From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)
|
9.14 score on a scale
Interval 4.8 to 13.5
|
3.46 score on a scale
Interval -1.0 to 7.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 week outcome examAccommodative response, Right eye. This is a measure the accuracy of focusing (accommodative accuracy or response) while the subject views a near target. Lower (positive) values represent better accuracy of focusing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
n=25 Participants
Glasses with hyperopic lenses (Correction)
|
Control
n=23 Participants
Glasses with placebo lenses
Control: Glasses with plano (no power, control) spectacle lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Accommodative Response From Baseline to After 6 Weeks of Assigned Treatment (Hyperopic or Control Correction)
|
0.23 Diopters
Interval -0.068 to 0.53
|
0.054 Diopters
Interval -0.25 to 0.36
|
Adverse Events
Glasses With Hyperopic Lenses
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Marjean Kulp
The Ohio State University College of Optometry
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place