Pharmacy Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Medication Refill

NCT ID: NCT00469365

Last Updated: 2008-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3048 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2006-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the effectiveness of 3 strategies by pharmacists to decrease the time to refill of prescriptions for common chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, depression, psychoses).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The design was a multi-site 8-month randomized, controlled clinical trial with the patient as the unit of randomization. The Institutional Review Board at the Medical University of South Carolina approved the study. The setting included 9 pharmacies within a medium-sized grocery store chain in South Carolina. The 9 pharmacies were selected to ensure an adequate sample size and sufficient representation by patients with respect to geographic region (urban, suburban, and rural), race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic background. Individual pharmacy staff were informed by their district manager (P.P.) that they were required to participate in the project. Beginning January 16, 2006 and continuing through August 29, 2006, all patients who were at least 7 days overdue for a qualified prescription were identified on a weekly basis (i.e. every Monday morning) using the centralized computer database. Patients identified as being overdue for a qualified medication were assigned a unique study identification number and randomized using a simple randomization technique operationalized within a Microsoft® Access® database. The randomization was based on a permuted block design with a block size of 3, with each patient thus having a one-third chance of being placed in any one of the 3 treatment arms.After eligible patients were identified and randomized each week, there were 3 different protocols followed, depending on the assigned treatment arm. The 3 treatment arms included 1) pharmacist contact with the patient via telephone, 2) pharmacist contact with the prescribing physician via facsimile, and 3) usual care.There were a total of 3,048 patients into arms 1 (n=1018), 2 (n=1016), and 3 (n= 1014). The study was designed to detect relatively small differences in the outcomes of interest. Baseline comparisons across treatment arms in the characteristics of patients and medications were made using t-tests and chi-square tests, as appropriate. For the analyses of study outcomes, an intent-to-treat approach was used. Statistical models were constructed to compare outcomes among the 3 treatment arms, after first examining whether significant interaction between treatment arm and medication disease classification was present. For the analyses of secondary outcomes, all of which were binary in nature, multivariable logistic regression models were used, with treatment arm as the key independent variable of interest, adjusting for the same covariates used in the primary analyses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Hypertension Hyperlipidemia Heart Diseases Depression Psychoses

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

clinical trial, medication adherence, pharmacy intervention Patients with specific chronic diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pharmacist contact with the patient via telephone

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pharmacist contact with the patient's physician via fax

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Usual care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients who were at least 7 days overdue for a qualified prescription were identified on a weekly basis (i.e. every Monday morning) using the centralized computer database. A qualified prescription was defined as having at least 2 refills remaining, a duration of at least a 30 days' supply, and having been written for any one of a number of chronic disease medications identified by a clinical pharmacist (A.M.W.). The medications of interest were those indicated for chronic treatment of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, depression, and psychoses. Medications that treat any combination of the specified diseases were allowed.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul J Nietert, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Barbara C Tilley, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P01HS010871

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link