Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of Voluven on Hemodynamics and Tolerability of Enteral Nutrition in Patients With Severe Sepsis (NCT NCT00464204)
NCT ID: NCT00464204
Last Updated: 2012-01-11
Results Overview
Initial hemodynamic stabilization (HDS) was defined as normalization of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and at least two of the three parameters central venous pressure (CVP), urine output and central venous oxygen saturation and maintaining this normalization over a period of four hours, with no increase in the infusion of vasopressors, or ionotropic therapy and with no more than 1 L of additional study drug administration within these four hours.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
196 participants
until hemodynamic stabilization (up to 48 hours)
2012-01-11
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited in 24 intensive care units of hospitals in France and Germany from July 2007 until February 2010 and were followed up until May 2010.
Participants were screened in intensive care units of the participating study sites in France and Germany.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
100
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Treatment
|
81
|
83
|
|
Overall Study
Day 30 Follow-up Performed
|
89
|
83
|
|
Overall Study
Day 90 Follow-up Performed
|
69
|
74
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal Due to Discharge From ICU
|
18
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
51
|
64
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
49
|
32
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effects of Voluven on Hemodynamics and Tolerability of Enteral Nutrition in Patients With Severe Sepsis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
Total
n=196 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=93 Participants
|
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 • n=4 Participants
|
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
64 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
87 participants
n=93 Participants
|
84 participants
n=4 Participants
|
171 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
13 participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Lungs
|
53 participants
n=93 Participants
|
58 participants
n=4 Participants
|
111 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Abdomen
|
24 participants
n=93 Participants
|
18 participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Urogenital
|
8 participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Skin, bone and soft tissue
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Other
|
5 participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Unknown
|
4 participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Neurological system
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Origin of sepsis
Ears-nose-throat system
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: until hemodynamic stabilization (up to 48 hours)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization.
Initial hemodynamic stabilization (HDS) was defined as normalization of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and at least two of the three parameters central venous pressure (CVP), urine output and central venous oxygen saturation and maintaining this normalization over a period of four hours, with no increase in the infusion of vasopressors, or ionotropic therapy and with no more than 1 L of additional study drug administration within these four hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=88 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=86 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of Study Drug Required to Achieve Initial Hemodynamic Stabilization
|
1379 Milliliter
Standard Deviation 886
|
1709 Milliliter
Standard Deviation 1164
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: until hemodynamic stabilization (up to 48 hours)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
Time from start of fluid resuscitation with study drug to the initial hemodynamic stabilization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=88 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=86 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time From Start of Fluid Resuscitation With Study Drug to the Initial Hemodynamic Stabilization
|
11.8 Hours
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
14.3 Hours
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 daysPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
Total quantity of study drug infused over four consecutive days in the ICU
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=88 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=86 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quantity of Study Drug in 4 Days
|
2615 Milliliter
Standard Deviation 1499
|
2788 Milliliter
Standard Deviation 1799
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until start of enteral nutrition (up to 48 hours)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
Time from start of fluid resuscitation with study drug to start of enteral nutrition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=62 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=67 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time From Start of Study Drug to Start of Enteral Nutrition in the Subgroup of Patients Who Received Enteral Nutrition
|
24.6 Hours
Standard Deviation 32.7
|
26.9 Hours
Standard Deviation 33.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 48 hoursPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
Administration of enteral nutrition before initial hemodynamic stabilization was ignored in this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=62 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=67 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time From Start of Fluid Resuscitation With Study Drug to Start of Enteral Nutrition After Hemodynamic Stabilization
|
25.9 Hours
Standard Deviation 32.1
|
27.6 Hours
Standard Deviation 33.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 daysPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
This amount will be calculated from start of enteral nutrition until 7 am of day 8
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=62 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=67 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Amount of Enteral Calories During the First Seven Days of Enteral Nutrition
|
6877 kcal
Standard Deviation 5008
|
7429 kcal
Standard Deviation 4381
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until discharge from ICU (up to day 90)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization. Calculated for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient
Length of stay was analysed in two approaches. First, it was calculated and analysed only for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient. As a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was carried out including patients who died with the maximum possible length of stay (i.e., the worst possible value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=58 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=61 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
|
15.4 Days
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
20.2 Days
Standard Deviation 22.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until discharge from ICU (up to Day 90)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization. Imputed with the longest possible duration for patients who died before end of the study of the individual patient.
Length of stay was analysed in two approaches. First, it was calculated and analysed only for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient. As a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was carried out including patients who died with the maximum possible length of stay (i.e., worst possible value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=88 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=86 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay in the ICU
|
40.0 Days
Standard Deviation 36.5
|
39.6 Days
Standard Deviation 36.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until discharge from hospital (up to day 90)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization. Calculated for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient.
Length of stay was analysed in two approaches. First, it was calculated and analysed only for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient. As a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was carried out including patients who died with the maximum possible length of stay (i.e., the worst possible value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=58 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=61 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay in the Hospital
|
37.7 Days
Standard Deviation 26.5
|
42.7 Days
Standard Deviation 31.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Until discharge from hospital (up to Day 90)Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization. Imputed with the longest possible duration for patients who died before end of the study of the individual patient.
Length of stay was analysed in two approaches. First, it was calculated and analysed only for patients who did not die before end of study of the individual patient. As a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was carried out including patients who died with the maximum possible length of stay (i.e., the worst possible value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=88 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=86 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay in the Hospital
|
56.1 Days
Standard Deviation 33.5
|
56.9 Days
Standard Deviation 34.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to Day 4Population: Full analysis set (FAS) = all randomized patients treated with study drug who reached hemodynamic stabilization
The Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in this study is reported for entire days, not for exact time points on a day. Potentially, more than one SOFA score may be available for the same day. In this case, the mean of the respective total scores was used for that day for calculation of Area Under the Curve (AUC). The SOFA score includes sub-scores for Respiration, Coagulation, Liver, Cardiovascular, Central Nervous System and Renal function and may range from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=82 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=74 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score Per Day From Screening to Day 4
|
6.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
7.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From Screening to end of Follow-upPopulation: Treated population (TRT) = all randomized patients treated with study drug. Two patients in the Voluven® arm died due to non-treatment emergent SAEs.
Mortality was reported for the time period from Screening until the end of follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality
From screening until (and including) Day 28
|
31 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Mortality
From screening until end of follow-up
|
40 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From screening to end of follow-up (up to day 90)Population: Treated population (TRT) = all randomized patients treated with study drug. Patients without ARF were excluded from analysis if they had no creatinine value at Screening or no post-screening creatinine value.
Acute Renal Failure (ARF) was defined as a two fold increase in serum concentration over the value at screening at any time after screening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=98 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=95 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 1. Acute Renal Failure (ARF) at Any Time After Screening
|
24 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From screening to end of follow-upPopulation: Treated population (TRT) = all randomized patients treated with study drug
Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Classification in this study is based on serum creatinine values and renal replacement therapy, i.e. ignoring criteria based on urine output, as fulfilment of urine output criteria cannot be determined from the data collected in the study. AKIN ranges from stage 1 to stage 3 (worst outcome). Stages differ in serum creatinine increase. Stage 1: Increase ≥ 0.3mg/dL or ≥ 150%-200% from reference; Stage 2: Increase ≥ 200%-300% from reference; Stage 3: Increase \>300% from reference with an acute increase of at least 0.5mg/dL or renal replacement therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 2. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Classification
AKIN Stage 1
|
21 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 2. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Classification
None
|
52 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 2. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Classification
AKIN Stage 2
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 2. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Classification
AKIN Stage 3
|
22 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From screening to end of follow-upPopulation: Treated population (TRT) = all randomized patients treated with study drug
Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) Classification in this study is based on serum creatinine values and renal replacement therapy, i.e. ignoring criteria based on urine output, as fulfilment of urine output criteria cannot be determined from the data collected in the study. RIFLE comprises five categories: Risk (R), Injury (I), Failure (F), Loss (L), End-stage kidney disease (E) (worst outcome). R, I and F are based on increase in serum creatinine. L and E are based on administration of renal replacement therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 Participants
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 Participants
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
None
|
77 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
Risk
|
13 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
Injury
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
Failure
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
Loss
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Changes in Renal Function: 3. Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage Kidney Disease (RIFLE) Classification
End-stage kidney disease
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Voluven® Arm
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 participants at risk
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 participants at risk
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute right ventricular failure
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradyarrhythmia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
5.0%
5/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
6.2%
6/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal perforation
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peritonitis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Condition aggravated
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
7.0%
7/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
5.2%
5/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Oedema due to cardiac disease
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal sepsis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudomembranous colitis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
8.3%
8/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Haemodilution
|
8.0%
8/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
9.4%
9/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tracheal haemorrhage
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood chloride increased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Venous oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperchloraemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoproteinaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Lactic acidosis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Marasmus
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bronchial carcinoma
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pleural carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tonsil cancer
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral disorder
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Coma
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory fatigue
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Toxic epidermal necrolysis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Withdrawal of life support
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Voluven® Arm
n=100 participants at risk
6 % Hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4; Voluven® rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first days and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
NaCl 0.9 % Arm
n=96 participants at risk
NaCl 0.9 %; NaCl 0.9 % rates were not to exceed 50 mL/kg/day on the first day and 25 mL/kg/day from the second to the fourth day
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
22.0%
22/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
21.9%
21/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia of chronic disease
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypocoagulable state
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
6.2%
6/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cyanosis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Low cardiac output syndrome
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
9.4%
9/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Diabetes insipidus
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Eye disorders
Pupils unequal
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
7.0%
7/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
5.2%
5/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
16.7%
16/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
17.0%
17/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
22.9%
22/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal necrosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired gastric emptying
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Malaena
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Regurgitation
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
15.0%
15/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
17.7%
17/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Device breakage
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Oedema due to cardiac disease
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
13.0%
13/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangiolitis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cytolytic hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice cholestatic
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection pseudomonal
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritoneal abscess
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia pneumococcal
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tuberculosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Airway complication of anaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Failure to anastomose
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Haemodilution
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
10.4%
10/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Mechanical ventilation complication
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Open wound
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Aspiration bronchial
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate increased
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine increased
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure diastolic increased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure systolic increased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Central venous pressure decreased
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Coagulation test abnormal
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Mean arterial pressure decreased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
PO2 decreased
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
PO2 increased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cell count decreased
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Urine output decreased
|
19.0%
19/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
15.6%
15/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Venous oxygen saturation decreased
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
12.5%
12/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
|
7.0%
7/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
13.5%
13/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Alkalosis
|
16.0%
16/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
14.6%
14/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Food intolerance
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperchloraemia
|
23.0%
23/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
29.2%
28/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
7.0%
7/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlactacidaemia
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperproteinaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
12.5%
12/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
22.0%
22/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
30.2%
29/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoproteinaemia
|
29.0%
29/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
22.9%
22/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Lactic acidosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic alkalosis
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin K deficiency
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain injury
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Critical illness polyneuropathy
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonus
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
12.5%
12/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Azotaemia
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Oliguria
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
5.2%
5/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
8.0%
8/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
6.2%
6/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
7.0%
7/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure chronic
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
3.0%
3/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial obstruction
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypercapnia
|
4.0%
4/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hyperventilation
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypocapnia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
33.0%
33/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
36.5%
35/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
2.1%
2/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory acidosis
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
4.2%
4/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory alkalosis
|
6.0%
6/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
6.2%
6/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
3.1%
3/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
2.0%
2/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Livedo reticularis
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.0%
9/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
8.3%
8/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
35.0%
35/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
39.6%
38/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Labile hypertension
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
1.0%
1/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis
|
1.0%
1/100
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
0.00%
0/96
Regular assessment by Pharmacovigilance and Safety Assessor
|
Additional Information
Professor Dr. Martin Westphal
Fresenius Kabi Aktiengesellschaft
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee All investigators agreed that there will be one or more publications describing the study and the results. No center or combination of centers will submit their results for publication separately. Highest recruiting centers and Fresenius Kabi will contribute authors. The writing of the manuscript will be a collaborative effort.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER