Comparison of Insulins Aspart and Lispro in Insulin Pumps

NCT ID: NCT00461331

Last Updated: 2021-01-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare the glycemic control between insulins aspart and lispro 48 to 100 hours after pump infusion line change in subjects with type 1 using diabetes using an insulin pump.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (Insulin pump therapy) is a well established tool for the management of type 1 diabetes. In clinical trials, insulin pump therapy has been shown to have increased efficacy over multiple daily injections. However, the overall glycemic control in patients using insulin pumps has been disappointing. The recommended duration of "needle use" in insulin pump treatment is 48 hours, based on anecdotal observations.

One of the reasons for the suboptimal control may be that patients do not adhere to the advice of changing their pump infusion line every 48 hours. However, it is possible that the loss of glycemic control may be related to instability of insulin in the pump/line. In addition to premeal loss of control after 48 hours of line change, very little is known about post-prandial hyperglycemia leading to loss of efficacy of the insulin via an insulin pump bolus. The development of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and new tests for short term fluctuations in glucose control such as 1,5-anhydroglucitol make it easier to evaluate the impact of short term loss of control in patients using the insulin pump who delay changing their lines.

The different variables will be compared between the two insulins using a paired t test.

1. Glycemic control will be will be compared 24 to 100 hours after pump infusion line change using CGMS and daily serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol.
2. Post prandial glycemic excursions in plasma glucose following a standardized breakfast 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change will be compared.
3. The used pump infusion line will be collected from the patient and analyzed for insulin binding to the plastic, as well as other possible effects that may determine its role in loss of glycemic control.
4. Comparison of some of the markers of coagulation, inflammation, protein glycation and oxidative stress 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Insulin 1

Either insulin Aspart or insulin Lispro were randomized to be insulin 1.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Insulin Aspart

Intervention Type DRUG

Either one of these insulins were given to the patient as the second insulin (depending on which was given as the first one, the other insulin was insulin 2). Patients used this insulin in the same dose as they did prior to entering the study.

Insulin 2

Between insulin Aspart and insulin Lispro, the one that was not used as insulin 1 was then used as the second insulin for the second arm of the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Insulin Lispro

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were given either insulin Aspart or Lispro in test period 1. Then they were switched to the other insulin in test period 2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Insulin Aspart

Either one of these insulins were given to the patient as the second insulin (depending on which was given as the first one, the other insulin was insulin 2). Patients used this insulin in the same dose as they did prior to entering the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Insulin Lispro

Patients were given either insulin Aspart or Lispro in test period 1. Then they were switched to the other insulin in test period 2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Insulin lispro - insulin Humalog Insulin aspart - insulin Novolog Insulin Aspart

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 1 Diabetes treated with a pump for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Plasma Creatinine \> 1.2 mg/dl
* Inability to give informed consent
* HbA1c \> 8%
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial drugs or any of their components
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tulane University Health Sciences Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vivian A Fonseca, MD, FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tulane Universtiy Health Sciences Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Translational Unit - Tulane School of Medicine

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F-0215

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.