Comparison of Insulins Aspart and Lispro in Insulin Pumps
NCT ID: NCT00461331
Last Updated: 2021-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-10-31
2008-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Glycemic Stability of Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Lispro in Insulin Pump Therapy
NCT00428207
Safety and Efficacy of NovoLog vs. Humalog in Insulin Pumps in Children and Adolescents
NCT00097071
Comparison of Insulin Glargine Against Insulin Aspart Infused Under the Skin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00184613
Safety and Efficacy Study of Insulin Lispro Versus Insulin Aspart in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Pump Therapy
NCT01474538
Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Lispro vs. Regular Insulin in Paediatric Population
NCT00071448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the reasons for the suboptimal control may be that patients do not adhere to the advice of changing their pump infusion line every 48 hours. However, it is possible that the loss of glycemic control may be related to instability of insulin in the pump/line. In addition to premeal loss of control after 48 hours of line change, very little is known about post-prandial hyperglycemia leading to loss of efficacy of the insulin via an insulin pump bolus. The development of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and new tests for short term fluctuations in glucose control such as 1,5-anhydroglucitol make it easier to evaluate the impact of short term loss of control in patients using the insulin pump who delay changing their lines.
The different variables will be compared between the two insulins using a paired t test.
1. Glycemic control will be will be compared 24 to 100 hours after pump infusion line change using CGMS and daily serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol.
2. Post prandial glycemic excursions in plasma glucose following a standardized breakfast 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change will be compared.
3. The used pump infusion line will be collected from the patient and analyzed for insulin binding to the plastic, as well as other possible effects that may determine its role in loss of glycemic control.
4. Comparison of some of the markers of coagulation, inflammation, protein glycation and oxidative stress 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Insulin 1
Either insulin Aspart or insulin Lispro were randomized to be insulin 1.
Insulin Aspart
Either one of these insulins were given to the patient as the second insulin (depending on which was given as the first one, the other insulin was insulin 2). Patients used this insulin in the same dose as they did prior to entering the study.
Insulin 2
Between insulin Aspart and insulin Lispro, the one that was not used as insulin 1 was then used as the second insulin for the second arm of the study.
Insulin Lispro
Patients were given either insulin Aspart or Lispro in test period 1. Then they were switched to the other insulin in test period 2.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insulin Aspart
Either one of these insulins were given to the patient as the second insulin (depending on which was given as the first one, the other insulin was insulin 2). Patients used this insulin in the same dose as they did prior to entering the study.
Insulin Lispro
Patients were given either insulin Aspart or Lispro in test period 1. Then they were switched to the other insulin in test period 2.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Plasma Creatinine \> 1.2 mg/dl
* Inability to give informed consent
* HbA1c \> 8%
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial drugs or any of their components
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vivian A Fonseca, MD, FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tulane Universtiy Health Sciences Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Translational Unit - Tulane School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F-0215
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.