Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of GSK1358820 In Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity (NCT NCT00460655)
NCT ID: NCT00460655
Last Updated: 2010-09-08
Results Overview
Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
Baseline, Week 12
2010-09-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
BTX 300U
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
DB BTX + OL BTX
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
DB Placebo + OL BTX
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus BTX (GSK1358820) 300U in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
STARTED
|
58
|
62
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
52
|
61
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
52
|
61
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
45
|
52
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
BTX 300U
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
DB BTX + OL BTX
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
DB Placebo + OL BTX
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus BTX (GSK1358820) 300U in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
6
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
2
|
|
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)
Meeting the Exclusion Criteria
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of GSK1358820 In Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66 • n=5 Participants
|
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32 • n=7 Participants
|
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Japanese
|
58 participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 participants
n=7 Participants
|
120 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)
|
-8.513 Score*week
Standard Deviation 6.6904
|
-5.085 Score*week
Standard Deviation 6.6496
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
-0.61 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.675
|
-0.52 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.765
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
-0.88 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.687
|
-0.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.718
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
-0.91 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.733
|
-0.47 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.712
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
-0.82 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
|
-0.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.676
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
-0.56 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.685
|
-0.40 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.583
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
0.40 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.178
|
0.66 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.401
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
0.54 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.224
|
0.63 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.449
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
0.46 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.190
|
0.72 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.474
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
0.61 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.188
|
0.78 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.811
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
0.55 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.264
|
0.58 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.565
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
2.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 34.828
|
-5.02 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.436
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
-6.10 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.852
|
-7.37 seconds
Standard Deviation 20.782
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
-7.80 seconds
Standard Deviation 20.568
|
-8.48 seconds
Standard Deviation 18.075
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
-3.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 35.780
|
-8.19 seconds
Standard Deviation 18.633
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
-10.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 26.930
|
-8.53 seconds
Standard Deviation 24.710
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
0.82 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.283
|
0.45 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.082
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
1.09 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.254
|
0.64 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.065
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
1.21 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.558
|
0.66 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.182
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
1.13 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.318
|
0.59 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.230
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
0.81 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.302
|
0.52 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.273
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
0.49 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.477
|
0.34 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.470
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
0.75 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.575
|
0.44 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.756
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
0.82 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.850
|
0.72 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.976
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
1.00 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.028
|
0.70 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.978
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
0.49 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.527
|
0.49 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.180
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 6
|
0.82 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.550
|
1.03 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.906
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 1
|
0.63 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.190
|
0.48 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 4
|
0.64 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.271
|
1.07 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.377
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 8
|
1.04 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.780
|
1.00 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.643
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Week 12
|
1.02 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.337
|
0.97 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.505
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
-1.37 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
|
-1.27 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.653
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
-1.29 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.682
|
-1.33 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.590
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
-1.03 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.646
|
-1.04 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.654
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
-1.55 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.706
|
-1.51 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.640
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
-1.36 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.675
|
-1.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.554
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
-1.19 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.732
|
-1.21 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.750
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
-1.48 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.750
|
-1.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.764
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
-1.41 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.694
|
-1.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.556
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
-1.44 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.751
|
-1.34 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.578
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
1.10 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.433
|
1.35 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.601
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
1.17 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.494
|
1.46 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.668
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
0.91 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.501
|
1.15 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.638
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
1.30 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.389
|
1.48 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.722
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
1.33 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.569
|
1.47 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.700
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
1.40 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.449
|
1.29 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.842
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
1.28 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.461
|
1.04 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.551
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
1.33 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.494
|
1.15 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.433
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
1.22 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.121
|
0.96 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.344
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
-11.21 seconds
Standard Deviation 25.670
|
-12.09 seconds
Standard Deviation 27.148
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
-11.14 seconds
Standard Deviation 27.453
|
-8.05 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.735
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
-10.50 seconds
Standard Deviation 27.726
|
-9.29 seconds
Standard Deviation 21.851
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
-13.49 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.674
|
-13.05 seconds
Standard Deviation 31.241
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
-8.05 seconds
Standard Deviation 45.061
|
-7.65 seconds
Standard Deviation 22.715
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
-16.31 seconds
Standard Deviation 32.613
|
-13.40 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.508
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
-20.09 seconds
Standard Deviation 42.452
|
-13.42 seconds
Standard Deviation 33.205
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
-15.91 seconds
Standard Deviation 43.589
|
-12.10 seconds
Standard Deviation 28.240
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
-16.37 seconds
Standard Deviation 51.482
|
-13.84 seconds
Standard Deviation 29.241
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
2.00 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.177
|
1.68 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.416
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
1.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.443
|
1.43 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.463
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
1.40 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.393
|
1.54 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.513
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
1.11 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.387
|
1.21 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.589
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
1.93 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.639
|
2.02 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.550
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
1.70 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.670
|
1.89 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.676
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
1.55 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.611
|
1.52 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.683
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
2.07 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.387
|
1.59 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.476
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
2.04 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.224
|
1.82 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.389
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
0.92 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.891
|
1.00 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.149
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
1.33 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.557
|
1.86 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.013
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
0.98 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.080
|
1.04 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.215
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
0.66 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.536
|
1.19 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.349
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
1.26 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.205
|
1.75 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.973
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
1.37 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.226
|
1.67 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.119
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
1.19 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.222
|
1.57 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.029
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
1.62 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.305
|
1.66 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.396
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
1.56 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.532
|
1.86 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.715
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=50 Participants
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after second injection in OL
|
1.49 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.882
|
2.00 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.798
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after second injection in OL
|
1.42 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.880
|
1.76 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.888
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after first injection in OL
|
1.14 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.708
|
1.54 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.878
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after first injection in OL
|
1.40 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.814
|
1.54 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.768
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after first injection in OL
|
1.28 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.919
|
1.46 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.702
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after second injection in OL
|
1.57 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.965
|
1.83 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.992
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 4 after third injection in OL
|
1.38 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.840
|
1.62 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.145
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 8 after third injection in OL
|
1.30 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.918
|
1.86 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.155
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Week 12 after third injection in OL
|
1.59 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.438
|
1.50 Points on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.219
|
Adverse Events
BTX 300U
Placebo
DB BTX + OL BTX
DB Placebo + OL BTX
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 participants at risk
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 participants at risk
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
DB BTX + OL BTX
n=50 participants at risk
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
DB Placebo + OL BTX
n=57 participants at risk
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus BTX (GSK1358820) 300U in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
3.4%
2/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer hemorrhage
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mania
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric polyps
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus ureteric
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
BTX 300U
n=58 participants at risk
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
Placebo
n=62 participants at risk
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
|
DB BTX + OL BTX
n=50 participants at risk
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
DB Placebo + OL BTX
n=57 participants at risk
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus BTX (GSK1358820) 300U in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria \[Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ankle \>=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection\])
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
13.8%
8/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
19.4%
12/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
30.0%
15/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
10.5%
6/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
3.4%
2/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
3.2%
2/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
5.2%
3/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
7.0%
4/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasm
|
1.7%
1/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
3.4%
2/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/58 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-2), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 3-4), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER