A Comparison Study of the Efficacy of Quetiapine and Haloperidol in Agitated Adults in Emergency Room
NCT ID: NCT00457366
Last Updated: 2019-07-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2009-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Haloperidol vs. Valproate in Agitation
NCT01750541
Inhaled Loxapine vs Intramuscular (IM) Haloperidol + Lorazepam for Agitation
NCT03110900
Ketamine Versus Haloperidol for Severe Agitation Outside the Hospital
NCT02103881
Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department
NCT03375671
Outcomes of Antipsychotic Medication Used in the Emergency Department
NCT02504450
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Quetiapine with the routine "cocktail for treatment of agitation.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Quetiapine by using high dose Quetiapine (300 mg) PO to treat agitated patients in the psychiatric emergency room.
The secondary purpose is to test the immediate effect on agitation caused by illicit drug abuse or the alcohol abuse.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Quetiapine
Quetiapine is being used in an ER setting on agitated patients, being administered orally.
Quetiapine
Quetiapine 300mg PO/Initial dose and repeat dose at 2 hours if deemed clinically necessary up to a maximum dose of Quetiapine 600mg PO QD
Haloperidol
"Haloperidol" is being used in an ER setting on agitated patients, administered IM. This is being used in combination with lorazepam and cogentin. We are comparing the use of this "cocktail" to quetiapine alone.
Haloperidol
given in combination with Lorazepam 2 mg IM, Cogentin 2 mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary
Lorazepam
"Lorazepam" is being used in an ER setting on agitated patients, administered IM.This is being used in combination with haloperidol, and cogentin. We are comparing the use of this "cocktail" to quetiapine alone.
Lorazepam
given in combination with Haloperidol 5mg IM and cogentin 2mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary.
Cogentin
"Cogentin" is being used in an ER setting on agitated patients, administered IM.
This is being used in combination with haloperidol, and lorazepam. We are comparing the use of this "cocktail" to quetiapine alone.
Cogentin
given in combination with haloperidol 5mg IM, and Lorazepam 2mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quetiapine
Quetiapine 300mg PO/Initial dose and repeat dose at 2 hours if deemed clinically necessary up to a maximum dose of Quetiapine 600mg PO QD
Haloperidol
given in combination with Lorazepam 2 mg IM, Cogentin 2 mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary
Lorazepam
given in combination with Haloperidol 5mg IM and cogentin 2mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary.
Cogentin
given in combination with haloperidol 5mg IM, and Lorazepam 2mg IM; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Provision of written informed consent-English and Spanish
3. Males and females age 18 to 60 years. Females who are pregnant by inspection should not be included.
4. Provision at diagnosis meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria for Axis I documented who present in an agitated state. PANSS-EC score should be \>15.
5. Ability, in the treating physician's opinion, to co-operate with taking oral medication
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unstable medical illness
3. Withdrawal stage from any illicit drugs
4. Psychosis that prohibits participation in trial
5. Females of childbearing age where pregnancy cannot be confirmed or denied by screening
6. Patients who required continued intervention or prolonged restraint
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
University of Southern California
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George M Simpson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
USC+LAC Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Los Angeles County Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS-05-00331
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.