Study to Assess Effectiveness of Giving Combination of Standard Chemotherapy Drugs Versus Combination of Standard Chemotherapy and New Drug Ixabepilone When Given Before Surgical Removal of Early Stage Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00455533

Last Updated: 2016-02-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

384 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will evaluate the effectiveness of ixabepilone when given after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) compared to standard treatment of paclitaxel given after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in patients with early stage breast cancer. In addition the study will verify predefined biomarkers as well as discover new biomarkers that could identify patients who are more likely to respond to ixabepilone than standard paclitaxel based therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ixabepilone

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, intravenous (IV), 40mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, IV, 600mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, IV, 60mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, IV, 80mg/m², Weekly, 12 Weeks

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, IV, 600mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous Solution, IV, 60mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ixabepilone

Intravenous Solution, intravenous (IV), 40mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Paclitaxel

Intravenous Solution, IV, 80mg/m², Weekly, 12 Weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

Intravenous Solution, IV, 600mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin

Intravenous Solution, IV, 60mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Epothilone IXEMPRA® BMS-247550

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed primary invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast , T2-3, N0-3, M0, with tumor size of ≥ 2 cm
* All patients with early stage breast adenocarcinoma may enroll irrespective of receptor status
* No prior treatment for breast cancer excluding therapy for DCIS
* Karnofsky performance status of 80 - 100
* left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% by echocardiogram or multiple gated acquisition (MUGA)
* Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy during and up to 8 weeks after the last dose of the investigational drug
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Inflammatory or metastatic breast cancer
* Unfit for breast and/or axillary surgery
* Evidence of baseline sensory or motor neuropathy
* Significant history of cardiovascular disease, serious intercurrent illness or infections including known human immu immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* History of prior anthracycline therapy Allergies to any study medication or Cremophor® EL
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comprehensive Cancer Center

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Northwest Oncology & Hematology Associates

Coral Spring, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Cancer Research Institute

Davie, Florida, United States

Site Status

Medical Specialists Of Palm Beaches

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Moffitt Cancer Center

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

University Medical Center, Inc

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

University Of New Mexico Cancer Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Cancer Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Providence Cancer Center

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Local Institution

Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Site Status

Local Institution

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Local Institution

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Local Institution

Bhopal, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Vellore, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Callao, Provincia Constitucional del Callao, Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

Local Institution

Davao City, , Philippines

Site Status

Local Institution

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Local Institution

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Jaén, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Coventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Austria France Germany India Italy Peru Philippines Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abdel-Fatah TMA, Agarwal D, Liu DX, Russell R, Rueda OM, Liu K, Xu B, Moseley PM, Green AR, Pockley AG, Rees RC, Caldas C, Ellis IO, Ball GR, Chan SYT. SPAG5 as a prognostic biomarker and chemotherapy sensitivity predictor in breast cancer: a retrospective, integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and protein analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):1004-1018. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00174-1. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27312051 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EUDRACT 2006-003047-24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CA163-100

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adjuvant Palbociclib in Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT03609047 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2