Rehabilitation of Patients With Modic Changes in the Lumbar Spine

NCT ID: NCT00454792

Last Updated: 2011-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare patients with low back pain (LBP) and Modic Changes from The Backcenter Funen, Ringe:

1. To compare the effect of two types of non-operative treatments:

A. exercise and advice to be physically active

B. restitution and advice not to overload the spine
2. To investigate if the results of the treatment are influenced by gender, age, smoking, and physical load.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The clinical experience is that many patients with Modic changes have relatively severe and persistent LBP, which typically appears to be resistant to treatment. Furthermore, a retrospective study at The Backcenter Funen, Ringe, shows that patients with MC fail to improve engaging physical activity. This is unfortunate, because the typical rehabilitation for patients with persistent LBP is back exercises and information about keeping physically active. This means that this relatively large subgroup of patients with Modic changes probably does not improve with the rehabilitation tools used today.

A randomised controlled trial has therefore been designed to study the specific subgroup of patients with Modic changes. In this study we will compare the present "state-of-the art" rehabilitation approach to persistent LBP (namely to exercise and keep active) with a new concept (restitution). The justification for this is that restitution reduces mechanical stress on the vertebrae and therefore would allow heeling of the possible micro fractures in Modic changes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exercise and advise to stay active

The exercise group received exercises for the stabilising muscles in the low back and abdomen together with dynamic exercises, exercises for postural instability and light physical fitness training.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Back exercise: At home every day. In groups once a week. Duration 10 weeks.

Rest and use of flexible lumbar belt

The rest group was instructed to avoid hard physical activity and to rest twice daily for one hour, by lying down

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Restitution

Intervention Type OTHER

Restitution: At home 2 times one hour. Meetings every 2 weeks. Duration 10 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise

Back exercise: At home every day. In groups once a week. Duration 10 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Restitution

Restitution: At home 2 times one hour. Meetings every 2 weeks. Duration 10 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient must have LBP with a current duration of 3 - 12 month.
* The patient must have an actual pain intensity ≥4 on numerical pain rating scale from 0-10.


* The patient must speak and understand Danish.
* The patient must be between 18-60 years of age.
* The patient must be willing to participate in the project. Inclusions criterium for the project
* There must be an MRI showing MC in the lumbar spine.

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient is unable to go through with the project because of other physical or mental disorder.
* The patient is pregnant.
* The patient is referred to operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Velux Fonden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Back Research Center, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rikke Krüger Jensen

MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claus Manniche, Prof.Dr.Med.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Middelfart, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jensen RK, Leboeuf-Yde C, Wedderkopp N, Sorensen JS, Manniche C. Rest versus exercise as treatment for patients with low back pain and Modic changes. A randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Med. 2012 Feb 29;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22376791 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VF-20060111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id