Trial Outcomes & Findings for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Busulfex-based Regimen (NCT NCT00448357)

NCT ID: NCT00448357

Last Updated: 2017-07-17

Results Overview

Relapse is defined as new or increased sites of disease or positive one marrow after a complete response (CR). The RFS was calculated as the percentage of patients who were alive and without relapse at 3 years

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

54 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Three years post-transplant

Results posted on

2017-07-17

Participant Flow

Patients with advanced, refractory, or high-risk hematologic cancers who were deemed suitable for myeloablative conditioning were recruited from one institution.

A total of 55 subjects were consented, but one subject was not enrolled due to disease progression or death prior to protocol therapy.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis
Experimental: GVHD prophylaxis Subjects with matched-related donors (MRDs) were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without alemtuzumab for graft vs host disease prophylaxis Subjects also receive busulfan and fludarabine . Matched unrelated donor (MUD) or mismatched related donor (MMRD) subjects receive GVHD prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) + Methotrexate Subjects also receive busulfan, fludarabine, and tacrolimus.
Overall Study
STARTED
54
Overall Study
COMPLETED
54
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Busulfex-based Regimen

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis
n=54 Participants
Experimental: GVHD prophylaxis Subjects with matched-related donors (MRDs) were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without alemtuzumab for graft vs host disease prophylaxis Subjects also receive busulfan and fludarabine . Matched unrelated donor (MUD) or mismatched related donor (MMRD) subjects receive GVHD prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) + Methotrexate Subjects also receive busulfan, fludarabine, and tacrolimus.
Age, Continuous
50 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
54 participants
n=5 Participants
Donor-recipient sex
Male-Female
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Donor-recipient sex
Female-Male
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Donor-recipient sex
Male-Male
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Donor-recipient sex
Female-Female
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Host cytomegalovirus (CMV) status
Negative
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Host cytomegalovirus (CMV) status
Positive
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Myelogenous leukemia
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Myelodysplasia
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Chronic myelogenous leukemia
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Hodgkin lymphoma
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Myelofibrosis
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Chronic lymphoblastic leukemia
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease histology
Plastic cell leukemia
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of transplant
Matched unrelated donor (MUD)
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of transplant
Matched unrelated donor (MRD)
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease risk
Low
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease risk
Intermediate
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease risk
High
18 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Three years post-transplant

Population: Because AUC levels varied between the groups and the goal was to identify an actual achieved AUC-based dose, additional outcome analyses were undertaken by dividing patients into thirds according to the actual AUCs delivered rather than the original planned AUCs.

Relapse is defined as new or increased sites of disease or positive one marrow after a complete response (CR). The RFS was calculated as the percentage of patients who were alive and without relapse at 3 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Three-year Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Rate at the Maximum Tolerated Dose Identified During Phase I of the Trial (Target AUC 6912)
22 percentage of participants
39 percentage of participants
43 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: first 6 weeks or 42 days following stem cell infusion

Dose limiting toxicity will be defined as any irreversible grade 3 or any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity that is related to busulfan infusion and not graft vs host disease or late infection after recovery from the initial period of myelosuppression. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose with probability of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of 0.25. The dose of continuous infusion IV busulfan based on blood levels derived from a test dose in conjunction with fludarabine and alemtuzumab plus tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=14 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=7 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=24 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
n=7 Participants
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
n=2 Participants
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
1 DLTs
1 DLTs
1 DLTs
2 DLTs
2 DLTs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day -15 to Day -11

Test doses of busulfan were administered and plasma levels were measured to determine a targeted AUC dosing estimate. The capacity is reported as the precision with which these test dose goals predicted the actual 90-hour mean AUC levels.Dose targeting precision was estimated by root mean squared error.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=14 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=7 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=24 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
n=7 Participants
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
n=2 Participants
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Capacity of Test Dosing of Busulfan That Would Result in the Desired Area Under the Curve Concentration Exposure of Patients Receiving a Full-dose Busulfan Regimen
11.7 percentage of error
4.9 percentage of error
10.2 percentage of error
11.1 percentage of error
15.9 percentage of error

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 100 days post transplant

Population: Because AUC levels varied between the groups and the goal was to identify an actual achieved AUC-based dose, additional outcome analyses were undertaken by dividing patients into thirds according to the actual AUCs delivered rather than the original planned AUCs.

GVHD can be mild, moderate or severe depending on the differences in tissue type between patient and donor. GVHD can be acute or chronic. Its symptoms can include: * Rashes, which include burning and redness, that erupt on the palms or soles and may spread to the trunk and eventually to the entire body * Blistering, causing the exposed skin surface to flake off in severe cases * Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea and loss of appetite, which can indicate that the gastrointestinal (digestive) tract is affected * Jaundice, or a yellowing of the skin, which can indicate liver damage * Excessive dryness of the mouth and throat, leading to ulcers * Dryness of the lungs, vagina and other surfaces

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Incidence of Graft vs Host Disease in Patients Between One Month and Two Years Post Transplant
Acute GVHD grade >=II
7 Participants
10 Participants
11 Participants
Incidence of Graft vs Host Disease in Patients Between One Month and Two Years Post Transplant
Acute GVHD grades III and IV
2 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
Incidence of Graft vs Host Disease in Patients Between One Month and Two Years Post Transplant
Chronic GVHD; intermediate/severe
4 Participants
6 Participants
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 30 days post transplant

Population: Because there were no differences in chimerism results as a function of either the immunosuppression used or busulfan dose received, the results are being reported only for the total population.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) chimerism is a measure identifying the genetic profiles of the transplant recipient and of the donor and then evaluating the extent of mixture in the recipient's blood, bone marrow, or other tissue.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=54 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant
Whole blood chimerism-Any
49 Participants
Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant
Whole blood chimerism->=95% donor
47 Participants
Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant
T Cell chimerism-Any
46 Participants
Incidence of DNA Chimerism in Patients Between One Month Post Transplant
T Cell chimerism>=95% donor
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Three years post-transplant

Population: Because AUC levels varied between the groups and the goal was to identify an actual achieved AUC-based dose, additional outcome analyses were undertaken by dividing patients into thirds according to the actual AUCs delivered rather than the original planned AUCs.

Percentage of participants alive at 3 years post transplant

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Low Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 5078 (full range 3933-5615) microM/min
Intermediate Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 6372 (full range 5639-6965) microM/min
High Busulfan AUC Tertile
n=18 Participants
Participants with the lowest tertile of measured busulfan Area under the curve (AUC); with a mean value of 7605 (full range 7054-8863) microM/min
Dose Level 4
Target AUC/24 hrs of 7603 uM-min+/- 15%
Dose Level 5
Target AUC/24 hrs of 8363 uM-min+/- 15%
Overall Survival
28 percentage of participants
39 percentage of participants
55 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis

Serious events: 26 serious events
Other events: 54 other events
Deaths: 15 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis
n=54 participants at risk
Experimental: GVHD prophylaxis Subjects with matched-related donors (MRDs) were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without alemtuzumab for graft vs host disease prophylaxis Subjects also receive busulfan and fludarabine . Matched unrelated donor (MUD) or mismatched related donor (MMRD) subjects receive GVHD prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) + Methotrexate Subjects also receive busulfan, fludarabine, and tacrolimus.
Infections and infestations
BK cystitis
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver Failiure
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
7.4%
4/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gr 4 GVHD
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gr 4 mucositis
9.3%
5/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Hepatobiliary disorders
Veno-occlusive disease
5.6%
3/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Infections and infestations
Aspergillus pneumonia
3.7%
2/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Infections and infestations
CMV pneumonitis
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Graft Failure
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
anemia
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
thrombocytopenia
7.4%
4/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
acute respiratory failure
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Renal and urinary disorders
renal Failure
3.7%
2/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Vascular disorders
left neck hematoma
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Endocrine disorders
Glucose Intolerance
1.9%
1/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Experimental: GVHD Prophylaxis
n=54 participants at risk
Experimental: GVHD prophylaxis Subjects with matched-related donors (MRDs) were treated with tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without alemtuzumab for graft vs host disease prophylaxis Subjects also receive busulfan and fludarabine . Matched unrelated donor (MUD) or mismatched related donor (MMRD) subjects receive GVHD prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) + Methotrexate Subjects also receive busulfan, fludarabine, and tacrolimus.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities (expected)
100.0%
54/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
100.0%
54/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs
Gastrointestinal disorders
grade 3 GI toxicity
38.9%
21/54 • Mortality was assessed at one year
Additional toxicities were not captured as this was a high-dose transplant study and grades 1, 2 and 3 AEs were generally expected and no unexpected toxicities were seen beyond those reported as SAEs

Additional Information

Dr. Thomas Shea

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Phone: 919-966-7746

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place