Standard vs. 3-Dimensional Coronary Angiography: a Paired Comparison

NCT ID: NCT00447148

Last Updated: 2007-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of this study is to evaluate whether the length of coronary segments, assessed by an experienced operator, using the "optimal view" of standard 2-dimensional coronary angiography, is over/underestimated with respect to the one evaluated automatically with the help of a 3-dimensional coronary reconstruction model. Moreover, both techniques are compared with an "in-vivo" surrogate of the real length of the coronary segment under evaluation, i.e. an intra-coronary marker guide-wire, which is a wire with markers placed at fixed and known distance along its length in its distal (intra-coronary) part. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) the length of a coronary segment evaluated with a standard 2-dimensional "optimal view" over/underestimates the length assessed by a 3-dimensional coronary model that automatically detects the least foreshortened length of the segment under evaluation, and (2) the 3-dimensional model approximates more closely than standard 2-dimensional angiography, the real length of the segment detected by the marker guide-wire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The potential to improve the accuracy of the assessment of the coronary tree by means of 3-D modeling reconstruction may lead to an evaluation of the coronary artery anatomy that approximates more correctly the real anatomy, thus subsequently leading to a more tailored diagnosis and therapy for the patients with ischemic heart disease.

Aim of the current study is to assess whether a 3-D model of the coronary tree offers a less foreshortened and less operator-dependent evaluation of the length of the coronary arteries with respect to standard coronary angiography. Furthermore, for the first time "in-vivo", a comparison with the "real" length of the vessel will be performed using as "gold standard" an intra-coronary guide-wire with radiopaque markers at fixed and known distance one from the other along its distal part.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Paired comparison of 2 angiographic techniques

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

3-dimensional coronary angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

3-dimensional coronary angiography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3-dimensional coronary angiography

3-dimensional coronary angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

coronary angiography

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Clinical

* Age \> 18 years.
* Ability to give informed consent.
* Clinical evidence of coronary artery disease:

* recent (\< 72 hours) acute myocardial infarction,
* stable angina with documented positive stress test,
* unstable angina with documented ischemia (positive ECG or troponin test or documented positive stress test).

Angiographic

* Eligibility for PCI in at least one de-novo stenosis in a native coronary artery, after the index angiogram.
* Planned PCI according to a previous coronary angiogram.

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical

* Pregnancy.
* Chronic or acute renal failure (serum creatinine \> 1.8 mg/dL or hemodialysis).
* Urgent procedure (a procedure carried out before the next referring day, for example for acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or cardiogenic shock).
* Contraindications or known hypersensitivity to contrast media.
* Enrollment in another study protocol.

Angiographic

* Significant left main coronary artery disease.
* PCI for a total occlusion of a major coronary vessel (LAD, LCX or RCA).
* Extensive thrombotic burden in a coronary lesion (thrombus grade 3/4).
* TIMI flow \<3 distal to the lesion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim

Stefan Verheye, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim

Glenn Van Langenhove, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACIM 2006-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id