Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Dutasteride 0.5mg Once Daily For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia (NCT NCT00441116)
NCT ID: NCT00441116
Last Updated: 2018-08-16
Results Overview
The Macrophotographic hair count method marks a 1-inch diameter circular area at the anterior leading edge of the vertex thinning area and then photographed. The photographs are enlarged and converted into dot maps and the dot maps are converted into total hair counts by means of personal computer-based scanners and imaging software.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
153 participants
Baseline and 6 months
2018-08-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Dutasteride
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
76
|
77
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
73
|
75
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Dutasteride
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Did not meet Eligibility Criteria
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Dutasteride 0.5mg Once Daily For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Male Subjects With Androgenetic Alopecia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=76 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
Total
n=153 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.07 • n=5 Participants
|
38.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.61 • n=7 Participants
|
38.097 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
153 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
|
76 participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 participants
n=7 Participants
|
153 participants
0 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
The Macrophotographic hair count method marks a 1-inch diameter circular area at the anterior leading edge of the vertex thinning area and then photographed. The photographs are enlarged and converted into dot maps and the dot maps are converted into total hair counts by means of personal computer-based scanners and imaging software.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 6 Months.
Baseline
|
148.14 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 36.27
|
144.27 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 32.33
|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 6 Months.
Month 6
|
162.27 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 38.52
|
149.57 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 34.44
|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 6 Months.
Change from Baseline - Month 6
|
12.21 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 23.60
|
4.67 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 16.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
The Macrophotographic hair count method marks a 1-inch diameter circular area at the anterior leading edge of the vertex thinning area and then photographed. The photographs are enlarged and converted into dot maps and the dot maps are converted into total hair counts by means of personal computer-based scanners and imaging software.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 3 Months.
Baseline
|
148.14 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 36.27
|
144.27 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 32.33
|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 3 Months.
Month 3
|
160.19 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 36.73
|
154.50 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 36.87
|
|
Change From Baseline Hair Growth Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (Hair Count) in the Vertex at 3 Months.
Change from Baseline - Month 3
|
7.58 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 22.70
|
10.24 hair count per centimeters squared
Standard Deviation 19.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Much less hair (Month 3)
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Moderately less hair (Month 3)
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Moderately more hair (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Much more hair (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Much less hair (Month 6)
|
9 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Moderately less hair (Month 6)
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Slightly less hair (Month 6)
|
24 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
The same amount of hair (Month 6)
|
25 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Slightly more hair (Month 6)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Moderately more hair (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Much more hair (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Slightly less hair (Month 3)
|
26 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
The same amount of hair (Month 3)
|
32 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Lost?
Slightly more hair (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I strongly disagree (month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I disagree (month 3)
|
18 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
No opinion either way (month 3)
|
20 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I agree (month 3)
|
34 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I strongly agree (month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I strongly disagree (month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I disagree (month 6)
|
18 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
No opinion either way (month 6)
|
12 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I agree (month 6)
|
40 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Usual Hair Loss Has Slowed Down?
I strongly agree (month 6)
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Moderately Better (Month 3)
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Much Better (Month 3)
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Much worse (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Moderately worse (Month 6)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Slightly worse (Month 6)
|
2 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Not changed (Month 6)
|
23 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Slightly Better (Month 6)
|
26 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Moderately Better (Month 6)
|
11 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Much Better (Month 6)
|
10 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Much worse (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Moderately worse (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Slightly worse (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Not Changed (Month 3)
|
36 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since Start of Treatment the Overall Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Hair on my Head is?
Slightly Better (Month 3)
|
25 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index without Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions without photographs concerning their perception of Change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I strongly disagree (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I disagree (Month 3)
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
No opinion either way (Month 3)
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I agree(Month 3)
|
62 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I strongly agree (Month 3)
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I strongly disagree (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I disagree (Month 6)
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
No opinion either way (Month 6)
|
3 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I agree (Month 6)
|
60 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment I Have Kept What Hair I Had?
I strongly agree(Month 6)
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Slightly more scalp (month 3)
|
3 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Moderately more scalp (month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Slightly less scalp (month 6)
|
26 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Much less scalp (month 3)
|
10 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Moderately less scalp (month 3)
|
17 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Slightly less scalp (month 3)
|
25 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
The same amount of scalp (month 3)
|
14 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Much more scalp (month 3)
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Much less scalp (month 6)
|
9 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Moderately less scalp (month 6)
|
16 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
The same amount of scalp (month 6)
|
20 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Slightly more scalp (month 6)
|
1 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Moderately more scalp (month 6)
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment, When I Look at my Thinning Area, I Can See?
Much more scalp (month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Much less scalp (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Moderately less scalp (Month 3)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Slightly less scalp (Month 3)
|
3 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
The same amount of scalp (Month 3)
|
20 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Slightly more scalp (Month 3)
|
25 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Moderately more scalp (Month 3)
|
15 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Much more scalp (Month 3)
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Much less scalp (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Moderately less scalp (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Slightly less scalp (Month 6)
|
2 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
The same amount of scalp (Month 6)
|
22 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Slightly more scalp (Month 6)
|
17 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Moderately more scalp (Month 6)
|
28 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment my Hair Now Covers?
Much more scalp (Month 6)
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Greatly decreased (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Moderately decreased (Month 3)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Slightly decreased (Month 3)
|
7 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Stayed the same (Month 3)
|
17 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Slightly increased (Month 3)
|
26 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Moderately increased (Month 3)
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Greatly increased (Month 3)
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Greatly decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Moderately decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Slightly decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Stayed the same (Month 6)
|
22 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Slightly increased (Month 6)
|
22 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Moderately increased (Month 6)
|
23 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Amount of Hair on my Thinning Area Has?
Greatly increased (Month 6)
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
GlaxoSmithKline - Hair Growth Index with Photographs subject assessment of change in hair loss and overall appearance at 3 and 6 months. Subjects answered 4 questions comparing photographs of their hair before treatment and concerning the last week and evaluated the change in Hair Growth.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Much Worse (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Moderately Worse (Month 3)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Slightly Worse (Month 3)
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Not Changed (Month 3)
|
16 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Slightly Better (Month 3)
|
28 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Moderately Better (Month 3)
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Much Better (Month 3)
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Much Worse (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Moderately Worse (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Slightly Worse (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Not Changed (Month 6)
|
21 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Slightly Better (Month 6)
|
24 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Moderately Better (Month 6)
|
19 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subjects Global Assessment of Hair Regrowth Question: Since the Start of Treatment the Appearance (Thickness, Hair Quality, Amount) of the Thinning Area on my Head is?
Much Better (Month 6)
|
9 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Improvement Distribution is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count. Score Range -3=greatly decreased to +3=greatly increased. 0=No change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Greatly decreased (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Moderately decreased (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Slightly decreased (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
No Change (Month 3)
|
28 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Slightly increased (Month 3)
|
35 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Moderately increased (Month 3)
|
8 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Greatly increased (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Greatly decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Moderately decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Slightly decreased (Month 6)
|
4 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
No Change (Month 6)
|
24 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Slightly increased (Month 6)
|
31 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Moderately increased (Month 6)
|
12 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Baseline
Greatly increased (Month 6)
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 and Month 6Population: Per Protocol Population (PP) defined as subjects in the ITT population taking study medication for 6 month and no identified as a major protocol violator.
Improvement Distribution Score is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count. Score Range: -3 = greatly decreased to +3 = greatly increased. 0 = No change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=64 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvements From Baseline Score
Month 3 Mean Score
|
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
|
Investigator's Photographic Assessment of Improvements From Baseline Score
Month 6 Mean Score
|
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 3 and Baseline to Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Improvement Distribution is based on the number of hairs per centimeters squared by macrophotographic conversion hair count. Score Range -3=greatly decreased to +3=greatly increased. 0=No change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Moderately increased (Month 6)
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Greatly increased (Month 6)
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Greatly decreased (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Moderately decreased (Month 3)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Slightly decreased (Month 3)
|
3 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
No change (Month 3)
|
28 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Slightly increased (Month 3)
|
33 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Moderately increased (Month 3)
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Greatly increased (Month 3)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Greatly decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Moderately decreased (Month 6)
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Slightly decreased (Month 6)
|
6 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
No Change (Month 6)
|
40 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Panel Assessment of Improvement Distribution From Screening
Slightly increased (Month 6)
|
20 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6 and Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Mean percent change from Baseline for DHT. DHT was measured in pg/ml. Change from baseline = Month 3, 6, and 10 values minus baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in DHT - Month 3
|
-16.92 Percent change
Standard Deviation 54.14
|
-1.90 Percent change
Standard Deviation 47.58
|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in DHT - Month 6
|
-4.30 Percent change
Standard Deviation 38.73
|
22.83 Percent change
Standard Deviation 45.30
|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in DHT - Month 10
|
3.85 Percent change
Standard Deviation 44.34
|
7.58 Percent change
Standard Deviation 50.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, Month 6, and Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Mean percent change from Baseline for testosterone. Testosterone was measured in ng/ml.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in Testosterone - Month 3
|
18.78 Percent change
Standard Deviation 28.69
|
-5.27 Percent change
Standard Deviation 28.90
|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in Testosterone - Month 6
|
8.15 Percent change
Standard Deviation 30.18
|
-6.59 Percent change
Standard Deviation 31.86
|
|
The Percentage Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Month 3, 6, and 10
% Change in Testosterone - Month 10
|
12.18 Percent change
Standard Deviation 26.17
|
0.99 Percent change
Standard Deviation 27.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study mediction and having at least one on visit endpoint. LH was only assessed at baseline.
Normal ranges: TSH, 0.25-3.50 µIU/mL; T4, 4.5-12.0 mg/dL; PSA, ≤4 ng/mL; DHT, males (m): prepuberty, \<0.1, adult, 0.25-0.75; females (f): prepuberty, \<0.03, premenopausal, 0.05-0.3, menopausal, \<0.03 ng/mL; T, m: 2.36-9.96; f: 0.08-0.86 ng/mL; LH, m: 1-8; f: follicular, 4-12; periovulatory, \>20; luteal 5-20; postmenopausal, \>10 IU/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Baseline - Normal
|
70 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Baseline - Abnormal
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Month 6 - Normal
|
70 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Month 6 - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Month 10 - Normal
|
71 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
TSH - Month 10 - Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Baseline - Normal
|
73 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Baseline - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Month 6 - Normal
|
70 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Month 6 - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Month 10 - Normal
|
72 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
T4 - Month 10 - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Screening - Normal
|
73 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Screening - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Month 6 - Normal
|
70 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Month 6 - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Month 10 - Normal
|
72 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
PSA - Month 10 - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Screening - Normal
|
72 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Screening - Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Month 6 - Normal
|
69 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Month 6 - Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Month 10 - Normal
|
70 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
DHT - Month 10 - Abnormal
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Screening - Normal
|
73 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Screening - Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Month 6 - Normal
|
67 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Month 6 - Abnormal
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Month 10 - Normal
|
69 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
Testosterone - Month 10 - Abnormal
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
LH - Baseline - Normal
|
67 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
|
Endocrinology Shifts in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4), Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), DHT, Testosterone (T), and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 10.
LH - Baseline - Abnormal
|
6 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Sodium, Potassium (mEq/L), and Bicarbonate
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Sodium - Baseline
|
141.23 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
141.41 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Sodium - Month 6
|
141.54 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
141.58 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Potassium (mEq/L) - Baseline
|
4.22 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
4.34 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Potassium (mEq/L) - Month 6
|
4.25 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
4.29 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Bicarbonate - Baseline
|
27.66 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
28.23 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
|
Laboratory Values: Electrolytes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Bicarbonate - Month 6
|
26.61 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
27.08 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Comparing Lab values and differences from Baseline to month 6
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
WBC - Baseline
|
6898.49 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1991.34
|
6336.93 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1815.00
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
WBC - Month 6
|
6463.61 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1421.58
|
6387.03 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1828.81
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Neutrophils - Baseline
|
53.46 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 9.17
|
53.52 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Neutrophils - Month 6
|
52.47 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.46
|
52.90 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.51
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Lymphocytes - Baseline
|
35.96 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.03
|
35.87 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.28
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Lymphocytes - Month 6
|
36.96 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 7.61
|
36.03 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 8.19
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Monocytes - Baseline
|
7.03 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
7.03 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Monocytes - Month 6
|
7.08 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
7.14 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Eosinophils - Baseline
|
2.81 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
2.69 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Eosinophils - Month 6
|
2.75 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
2.99 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Basophils - Baseline
|
0.48 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.52 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Basophils - Month 6
|
0.50 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.51 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Platelets - Baseline
|
249.63 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 52.79
|
250.19 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 53.67
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Platelets - Month 6
|
243.69 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 46.03
|
240.26 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 50.90
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Hemoglobin (%)- Baseline
|
15.44 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
15.54 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Hemoglobin (%) - Month 6
|
15.41 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
15.46 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
MCV (fL)- Baseline
|
92.12 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 3.31
|
91.89 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 4.06
|
|
Laboratory Values: Hematology Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
MCV (fL) - Month 6
|
91.57 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
91.44 thousands/microliter
Standard Deviation 3.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
sGOT (AST)- serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase, sGPT (ALT) - serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Bilirubin(mg/dL) and Albumin(g/dL)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
AST(SGOT) - Baseline
|
23.10 IU/L
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
22.80 IU/L
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
AST(SGOT) - Month 6
|
25.88 IU/L
Standard Deviation 10.55
|
25.11 IU/L
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
ALT(SGPT) - Baseline
|
29.79 IU/L
Standard Deviation 15.11
|
26.91 IU/L
Standard Deviation 12.36
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
ALT(SGPT) - Month 6
|
34.00 IU/L
Standard Deviation 25.79
|
30.47 IU/L
Standard Deviation 18.81
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Alkaline Phosphatase - Baseline
|
87.34 IU/L
Standard Deviation 40.14
|
85.79 IU/L
Standard Deviation 46.15
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Alkaline Phosphatase - Month 6
|
85.51 IU/L
Standard Deviation 33.09
|
84.24 IU/L
Standard Deviation 42.44
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Bilirubin (mg/dL) - Baseline
|
0.78 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.71 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Bilirubin (mg/dL) - Month 6
|
0.80 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.79 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Albumin (g/dL) - Baseline
|
4.66 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
4.60 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
|
Laboratory Values: Liver Enzymes Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Albumin (g/dL) - Month 6
|
4.64 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
4.60 IU/L
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: Intent to Treat(ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
Glucose, Creatinine, Ferritine (ug/L) and Zinc (Hmol/L)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Glucose - Baseline
|
104.48 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 25.32
|
101.56 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.17
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Glucose - Month 6
|
104.49 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 24.45
|
106.31 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 20.82
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Creatinine - Baseline
|
1.03 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
1.03 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Creatinine - Month 6
|
1.05 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
1.06 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Ferritine (ug/L) - Baseline
|
100.21 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 55.11
|
131.91 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 77.74
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Ferritine (ug/L) - Month 6
|
109.61 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 64.29
|
132.36 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 87.91
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Zinc (Hmol/L) - Baseline
|
111.19 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 35.35
|
112.66 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 45.62
|
|
Laboratory Values: Other Chemistry Assessed at Baseline and 6 Months.
Zinc (Hmol/L) - Month 6
|
118.07 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 40.75
|
113.87 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 39.80
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ScreeningPopulation: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Very Small Problem
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Small Problem
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Medium Problem
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - No Problem
|
60 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - No Problem
|
62 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Very Small Problem
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Small Problem
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - No Problem
|
64 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Very Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Screening - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - No Problem
|
63 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Very small problem
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Small problem
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Medium problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Big problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - No Problem
|
64 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Very small problem
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Small problem
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Medium problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Big problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - No Problem
|
63 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Very small problem
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Small problem
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Medium problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Baseline - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Big problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Very Small Problem
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - No Problem
|
49 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Very small Problem
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Small Problem
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Medium Problem
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - No Problem
|
52 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Very Small Problem
|
11 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Medium Problem
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - No Problem
|
55 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Medium Problem
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 3 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Very Small Problem
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Very Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - No Problem
|
57 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - No Problem
|
56 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Small Problem
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Medium Problem
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Medium Problem
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - No Problem
|
58 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Very Small Problem
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Small Problem
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 6 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Medium Problem
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Big Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - No Problem
|
62 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Very Small Problem
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Sex Drive - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - No Problem
|
59 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Very Small Problem
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Small Problem
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Erection - Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - No Problem
|
60 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Very Small Problem
|
7 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory - Month 10 - Sex Drive, Erection, and Ejaculation
Ejaculation - Small Problem
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
53 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
53 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
No Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Big Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 6Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
54 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 6 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
57 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 in Sex Drive
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
54 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
No Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Big Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Erection
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 10Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized subjects received at least one dose of study medication and having at least one on visit endpoint.
In the past 7 days, to what extent have you considered: a lack of sex drive to be a problem?, your ability to get and keep erections to be a problem? your ejaculation to be a problem? For example, "No Problem shift to No Problem" indicates that the participant experienced no problem at baseline and no problem at Month 6, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 Participants
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to No Problem
|
56 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Very Small problem
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Small Problem
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
No Problem shift to Big Problem
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Very Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to No Problem
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Small Problem
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Small Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to No Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Medium Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to No Proble
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Very Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Small Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Medium Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Sexual Function Inventory: Shifts From Baseline to Month 10 - Ejaculation
Big Problem shift to Big Problem
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Dutasteride
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 participants at risk
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid Cancer
|
0.00%
0/73
|
1.3%
1/75 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Dutasteride
n=73 participants at risk
Subjects who were given 0.5mg of Dutasteride once daily for 6 months in male subjects age 18-49 years with Androgenetic Alopecia(AGA) in the vertex region, types IIIv, IV and V according to the modified Norwood-Hamilton Classification.
|
Placebo
n=75 participants at risk
Subjects who were given no Investigational product.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasopharyngitis
|
16.4%
12/73
|
9.3%
7/75
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will no prohibit any investigator form publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER