Aripiprazole in the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT00440713
Last Updated: 2007-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-31
2006-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that aripiprazole has an efficacy to reduce PTSD symptoms
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The inclusion criteria were: both genders, aged 18 to 60, diagnosis of PTSD DSM-IV criteria by a trained psychiatrist after the application of the SCID-I. Women must be using contraceptive methods during the study. Women had to be using contraceptive methods during the study. The exclusion criteria were to have a diagnostic of the following conditions: schizophrenic disorder, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic depression episode and psychoactive substance dependency disorder in the previous 6-month period, instable medical diseases, and pregnancy.
All included patient was submitted at baseline to a socio-demographic inventory and to a psychometric evaluation, the latter were reapplied at weeks 8 and 16. The psychometric evaluation consist of self-report instruments: CAPS to measure PTSD symptoms severity, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) \[29\] and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) \[30\] to measure the depressive and the anxiety symptoms severity, the Medical Outcome Scale short form (MOS-SF-36) \[31\] and the Social adjustment scale (SAS) \[32\] to evaluate quality of life and social adjustment. A 7.5mg single dose of aripiprazole was prescribed, and the patient was evaluated each two weeks and dose could be increased or decreased depending of their tolerability to side effects. After 16-week the drug was discontinued over a two week period.
Thirty-two outpatients were included after filling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-four (75%) were women and 8 (25%) men. Eighteen (56.3%) were married, eight (25%) single, and six (18.7%) were widowed or divorced. Their mean age was 38.41 (+/-10.97) years old, and the mean time since trauma happened was 50.87 (+/-77.21) months. Three (9.4%) patients have been victims of sexual abuse, four (12.5%) kidnapped, four (12.5%) held hostage in prison rebellion, 7 (21.88%) lost a close person to homicide, 8 (18.75%), suffered a homicide attempt.
Nine (28%) patients discontinued the treatment before the second assessment. Six (18.7%) patients discontinued the medication because of adverse events (anxiety, psychomotor agitation, nausea, and insomnia), three (3) patients abandoned the treatment and we lost contact with them. Six (6) patients had at least a second assessment, but did not complete 16-week trial, three due to a complete remission and a resistance to continue on the study and three discontinued due to lack of clinical improvement. The BDI baseline mean score from the dropouters was 28.7 (+/- 12.7) higher compared to the completers 25 (+/- 11.2) showing a statistically significant difference (t=.2167 p\<.02) The mean dose was 9.6 (+/-4.3) mg/day, with the dose range of 3.75 to 15 mg day.
An intention-to-treat analysis using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) including the baseline outcome data found a CAPS mean score at baseline of 82.7 (+/- 23.1) and 51.4 (+/-31.4) on endpoint, over 38% reduction from the baseline. Comparing the data using the t test the difference between before and after the treatment was statistically significant (t=.000002, p\<.001 - Table and Graph 1).
When using a concept of 30% decrease at CAPS mean score from baseline as a response to treatment, 17 (53.1%) patients have a response, and when using a more restrictive concept of 50% decrease at CAPS mean score 13 (40.6%) patients responded to the treatment.
The mean BAI score at baseline was 31.7 (+/- 13.4) and at the end-point were 25.4 (+/-18.2) (t=.01, p\<.05) The SAS mean index score at baseline was 2.4 (+/-.45) and on the endpoint 2.27 (+/- .57) (t=.033, p\<.05). The SF-36 mean score at baseline was 76.6 (+/-14.11) and at baseline 94.01 (+/- 25.06) (t=.0006, p\<.05). On all measures, excepted on BDI, the differences between baseline and endpoint means were statistically significant. On the BDI with a mean score at baseline of 26.06 (+/- 11.6) and at the end-point of 21.35 (+/-12.6), the difference wasn't statistically significant (t=.58, p\<.05).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aripiprazole
Interpersonal Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Use of an effective contraceptive method when the subject is women with sexual activity and with risk of pregnancy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of psychoactive substance dependence within 6-months before the study enrollment.
* To have decompensated medical diagnostics needing urgent treatment
* being pregnant.
* using psychoactive drugs.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcelo F Mello, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Federal University of São Paulo
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id