Concurrent Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Radiotherapy for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00433563
Last Updated: 2022-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
547 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2019-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different schedules of radiation therapy to compare how well they work when given together with cisplatin and etoposide in treating patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiation Therapy Plus Combination Chemotherapy In Treating Patients With Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003364
Randomised Study of Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00633568
Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00033696
Radiation Therapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Cisplatin and Etoposide
NCT00632853
Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00006012
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare overall survival of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy comprising cisplatin, etoposide, and once vs twice daily radiotherapy.
Secondary
* Compare local progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare metastasis-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare response rates in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the cytotoxic dose intensity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the dose intensity of two different schedules of radiotherapy in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and lactic dehydrogenase, sodium, and alkaline phosphatase levels. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1-3 OR on day 1 only and etoposide IV over 45-90 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses. During course 2, patients undergo concurrent radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6½ weeks (total of 33 fractions).
* Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin and etoposide as in arm I. During courses 2 and 3, patients undergo concurrent radiotherapy twice daily 5 days a week for 3 weeks (total of 30 fractions).
In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Beginning 3-4 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients in both arms achieving a complete or partial response with no evidence of brain metastasis undergo prophylactic cranial irradiation once daily 5 days a week for 2 weeks (total of 10 fractions).
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 532 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Once daily radiotherapy
Once daily radiotherapy
Once daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy
Twice daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy
Twice daily radiotherapy
Twice daily radiotherapy
Once daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy
Twice daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Once daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy
Twice daily radiotherapy
Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Performance status ECOG grade 0-1. Patients with PS 2 whose general condition is explained by obstructive/bulky disease likely to improve after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be included at the discretion of the local investigator. Patients with PS 2 as a result of comorbid conditions will be excluded.
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC
* No patients with mixed small-cell and non-small-cell histologic features
* No history of previous malignancy in the last 5 years (except non melanomatous skin or in-situ cervix carcinoma). Patients with previous malignancies (except breast cancer) and in remission for at least 5 years can be included.
* Limited stage disease (Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group) ie patients whose disease can be encompassed within a radical radiation portal.
* No pleural or pericardial effusions proven to be malignant
* RT target volume acceptable by the local radiotherapist
* Pulmonary function
1. FEV1 \>1 litre or 40% predicted value
2. KCO (DLCO/VA) \>40%predicted
* Maximum of one of the following adverse biochemical factors:
1. Serum alkaline phosphatase more than \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
2. Serum sodium \< Lower limit of Normal
3. Serum LDH \> ULN
* Normal serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance \>50 ml/min. If calculated creatinine clearance is \<50 ml/mn according to the Cockroft and Gault formula, an EDTA clearance should be performed
* Adequate haematological function
1. Neutrophils \>1.5 x 109/l
2. Platelets \>100 x 109/l
* Adequate liver function: ALT \& AST \<= 2.5 x ULN
* No other previous or concomitant illness or treatment which in the opinion of the clinician will interfere with the trial treatments or comparisons
* No prior surgical resection of the primary tumour, no prior radiotherapy for lung cancer
* Considered fit to receive any of the trial regimens
* Female patients must satisfy the investigator that they are not pregnant, or are not of child-bearing potential, or are using adequate contraception. Men must also use adequate contraception, as etoposide is clastogenic.
* Patients must not be breastfeeding
* Patient has read the patient information sheet and has signed the consent form.
* Patients available for follow-up
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cancer Research UK
OTHER
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
NETWORK
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
NETWORK
Spanish Lung Cancer Group
OTHER
Groupe Francais De Pneumo-Cancerologie
OTHER
Intergroupe Francophone de Cancerologie Thoracique
OTHER
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Corinne Faivre-Finn, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tay RY, Fernandez-Gutierrez F, Foy V, Burns K, Pierce J, Morris K, Priest L, Tugwood J, Ashcroft L, Lindsay CR, Faivre-Finn C, Dive C, Blackhall F. Prognostic value of circulating tumour cells in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily radiotherapy (CONVERT) randomised controlled trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1114-1120. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz122.
Salem A, Mistry H, Hatton M, Locke I, Monnet I, Blackhall F, Faivre-Finn C. Association of Chemoradiotherapy With Outcomes Among Patients With Stage I to II vs Stage III Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):e185335. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5335. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Faivre-Finn C, Snee M, Ashcroft L, Appel W, Barlesi F, Bhatnagar A, Bezjak A, Cardenal F, Fournel P, Harden S, Le Pechoux C, McMenemin R, Mohammed N, O'Brien M, Pantarotto J, Surmont V, Van Meerbeeck JP, Woll PJ, Lorigan P, Blackhall F; CONVERT Study Team. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1116-1125. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30318-2. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Groom N, Wilson E, Faivre-Finn C. Effect of accurate heart delineation on cardiac dose during the CONVERT trial. Br J Radiol. 2017 May;90(1073):20170036. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170036. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Colaco R, Sheikh H, Lorigan P, Blackhall F, Hulse P, Califano R, Ashcroft L, Taylor P, Thatcher N, Faivre-Finn C. Omitting elective nodal irradiation during thoracic irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer--evidence from a phase II trial. Lung Cancer. 2012 Apr;76(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Sheikh H, Colaco R, Lorigan P, Blackhall F, Califano R, Ashcroft L, Taylor P, Thatcher N, Faivre-Finn C. Use of G-CSF during concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer safety data from a phase II trial. Lung Cancer. 2011 Oct;74(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHNT-CONVERT
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHNT-CTAAC-CONVERT-C17052/A815
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000531709
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.