Concurrent Once Daily Versus Twice Daily Radiotherapy for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00433563

Last Updated: 2022-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

547 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known which schedule of radiation therapy is more effective when given together with chemotherapy in treating small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different schedules of radiation therapy to compare how well they work when given together with cisplatin and etoposide in treating patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare overall survival of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy comprising cisplatin, etoposide, and once vs twice daily radiotherapy.

Secondary

* Compare local progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare metastasis-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare response rates in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the cytotoxic dose intensity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the dose intensity of two different schedules of radiotherapy in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and lactic dehydrogenase, sodium, and alkaline phosphatase levels. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1-3 OR on day 1 only and etoposide IV over 45-90 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses. During course 2, patients undergo concurrent radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6½ weeks (total of 33 fractions).
* Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin and etoposide as in arm I. During courses 2 and 3, patients undergo concurrent radiotherapy twice daily 5 days a week for 3 weeks (total of 30 fractions).

In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Beginning 3-4 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients in both arms achieving a complete or partial response with no evidence of brain metastasis undergo prophylactic cranial irradiation once daily 5 days a week for 2 weeks (total of 10 fractions).

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 532 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Once daily radiotherapy

Once daily radiotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Once daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy

Twice daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy

Twice daily radiotherapy

Twice daily radiotherapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Once daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy

Twice daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Once daily radiotherapy

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + once daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Twice daily radiotherapy

Standard of care chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide) + twice daily radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Either sex, age ≥18 years
* Performance status ECOG grade 0-1. Patients with PS 2 whose general condition is explained by obstructive/bulky disease likely to improve after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be included at the discretion of the local investigator. Patients with PS 2 as a result of comorbid conditions will be excluded.
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC
* No patients with mixed small-cell and non-small-cell histologic features
* No history of previous malignancy in the last 5 years (except non melanomatous skin or in-situ cervix carcinoma). Patients with previous malignancies (except breast cancer) and in remission for at least 5 years can be included.
* Limited stage disease (Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group) ie patients whose disease can be encompassed within a radical radiation portal.
* No pleural or pericardial effusions proven to be malignant
* RT target volume acceptable by the local radiotherapist
* Pulmonary function

1. FEV1 \>1 litre or 40% predicted value
2. KCO (DLCO/VA) \>40%predicted
* Maximum of one of the following adverse biochemical factors:

1. Serum alkaline phosphatase more than \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
2. Serum sodium \< Lower limit of Normal
3. Serum LDH \> ULN
* Normal serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance \>50 ml/min. If calculated creatinine clearance is \<50 ml/mn according to the Cockroft and Gault formula, an EDTA clearance should be performed
* Adequate haematological function

1. Neutrophils \>1.5 x 109/l
2. Platelets \>100 x 109/l
* Adequate liver function: ALT \& AST \<= 2.5 x ULN
* No other previous or concomitant illness or treatment which in the opinion of the clinician will interfere with the trial treatments or comparisons
* No prior surgical resection of the primary tumour, no prior radiotherapy for lung cancer
* Considered fit to receive any of the trial regimens
* Female patients must satisfy the investigator that they are not pregnant, or are not of child-bearing potential, or are using adequate contraception. Men must also use adequate contraception, as etoposide is clastogenic.
* Patients must not be breastfeeding
* Patient has read the patient information sheet and has signed the consent form.
* Patients available for follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cancer Research UK

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NCIC Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spanish Lung Cancer Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Groupe Francais De Pneumo-Cancerologie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Intergroupe Francophone de Cancerologie Thoracique

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Corinne Faivre-Finn, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tay RY, Fernandez-Gutierrez F, Foy V, Burns K, Pierce J, Morris K, Priest L, Tugwood J, Ashcroft L, Lindsay CR, Faivre-Finn C, Dive C, Blackhall F. Prognostic value of circulating tumour cells in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily radiotherapy (CONVERT) randomised controlled trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1114-1120. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz122.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31020334 (View on PubMed)

Salem A, Mistry H, Hatton M, Locke I, Monnet I, Blackhall F, Faivre-Finn C. Association of Chemoradiotherapy With Outcomes Among Patients With Stage I to II vs Stage III Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):e185335. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5335. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30520977 (View on PubMed)

Faivre-Finn C, Snee M, Ashcroft L, Appel W, Barlesi F, Bhatnagar A, Bezjak A, Cardenal F, Fournel P, Harden S, Le Pechoux C, McMenemin R, Mohammed N, O'Brien M, Pantarotto J, Surmont V, Van Meerbeeck JP, Woll PJ, Lorigan P, Blackhall F; CONVERT Study Team. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1116-1125. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30318-2. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28642008 (View on PubMed)

Groom N, Wilson E, Faivre-Finn C. Effect of accurate heart delineation on cardiac dose during the CONVERT trial. Br J Radiol. 2017 May;90(1073):20170036. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170036. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28362511 (View on PubMed)

Colaco R, Sheikh H, Lorigan P, Blackhall F, Hulse P, Califano R, Ashcroft L, Taylor P, Thatcher N, Faivre-Finn C. Omitting elective nodal irradiation during thoracic irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer--evidence from a phase II trial. Lung Cancer. 2012 Apr;76(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22014897 (View on PubMed)

Sheikh H, Colaco R, Lorigan P, Blackhall F, Califano R, Ashcroft L, Taylor P, Thatcher N, Faivre-Finn C. Use of G-CSF during concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer safety data from a phase II trial. Lung Cancer. 2011 Oct;74(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21353720 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHNT-CONVERT

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHNT-CTAAC-CONVERT-C17052/A815

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000531709

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.