Trial Outcomes & Findings for Preoperative Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (NCT NCT00430027)
NCT ID: NCT00430027
Last Updated: 2013-12-12
Results Overview
The primary objective of this pilot study was to determine whether neoadjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin/cetuximab and external beam radiation therapy followed by surgical resection and then followed by post operative adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin and cetuximab is feasible with acceptable toxicity profile.
TERMINATED
NA
8 participants
Up to 4 weeks
2013-12-12
Participant Flow
Between November 2006 and August 2008, 8 patients were enrolled in the study from the Radiation Oncology clinic.
This was to be a pilot/feasibility trial with a maximum of 15 patients enrolled, with the intent to propose a phase II trial. The study stopped before enrolling 15 patients, therefore the phase II trial was not pursued.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
Patients enrolled on the trial received neoadjuvant combined capecitabine, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. This was followed by surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
Patients enrolled on the trial received neoadjuvant combined capecitabine, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. This was followed by surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated
|
8
|
Baseline Characteristics
Preoperative Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
n=8 Participants
Patients enrolled on the trial received neoadjuvant combined capecitabine, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. This was followed by surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeksPopulation: The study was terminated, study end points were not reached.
The primary objective of this pilot study was to determine whether neoadjuvant capecitabine/oxaliplatin/cetuximab and external beam radiation therapy followed by surgical resection and then followed by post operative adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin and cetuximab is feasible with acceptable toxicity profile.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
n=8 participants at risk
Patients enrolled on the trial received neoadjuvant combined capecitabine, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. This was followed by surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation Therapy
n=8 participants at risk
Patients enrolled on the trial received neoadjuvant combined capecitabine, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. This was followed by surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 3 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Distension
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
75.0%
6/8 • Number of events 21 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Investigations
INR
|
37.5%
3/8 • Number of events 11 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphatemia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 4 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Participants were monitored for approximately 2 years.
Patients were assessed weekly at their clinic visits.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place