Trial Outcomes & Findings for Single Versus Combination Medication Treatment for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (NCT NCT00429273)

NCT ID: NCT00429273

Last Updated: 2021-07-30

Results Overview

The primary clinical efficacy variable for treatment was the ADHD-RS-IV (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) Total Score and two sub-scales (Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive ). The rating scale has 18 questions with answer options: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) and Severe (3). Min 0; max 3. Scores are obtained by summing each item; The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Total score range: 0-54 Total Inattentive score range: 0-27 Total Hyperactive/Impulsive score range: 0-27

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

212 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Measured at baseline Week 4 and Week 8

Results posted on

2021-07-30

Participant Flow

212 randomized (deemed eligible and enrolled). 71 randomized to Group 1: 3 dropped prior to receiving drug; thus 68 started drug. 70 randomized to Group 2: 1 dropped before receiving drug; thus 69 started drug. 71 randomized to Group 3:1 dropped before receiving drug; thus 70 started drug.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+Placebo
Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH
weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH
Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
Overall Study
STARTED
68
69
70
Overall Study
COMPLETED
60
61
61
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
8
8
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+Placebo
Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH
weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH
Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
2
2
Overall Study
Physician Decision
6
5
5
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo
n=68 Participants
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine +Placebo
Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH
n=69 Participants
weeks 1-4: Placebo weeks 5-8: Placebo+DMPH
Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH (Comb)
n=70 Participants
weeks 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
Total
n=207 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
10.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
10.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=7 Participants
9.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=5 Participants
10.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
65 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
142 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
51 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
51 Participants
n=7 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
41 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
143 Participants
n=4 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
7 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
10 Participants
n=7 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
19 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
36 Participants
n=4 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
7 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
4 Participants
n=7 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
5 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
16 Participants
n=4 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
4 Participants
n=7 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
5 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
12 Participants
n=4 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
16 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
10 Participants
n=7 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
18 Participants
n=5 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.
44 Participants
n=4 Participants • of the 212 participants randomized, 207 received at least one dose of study drug and form the safety and intent-to-treat samples.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Measured at baseline Week 4 and Week 8

Population: Every contrast includes estimates of maturation/time trend and the within subject covariance structure based on all participants using full information maximum likelihood estimation.

The primary clinical efficacy variable for treatment was the ADHD-RS-IV (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) Total Score and two sub-scales (Inattentive and Hyperactive-Impulsive ). The rating scale has 18 questions with answer options: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) and Severe (3). Min 0; max 3. Scores are obtained by summing each item; The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Total score range: 0-54 Total Inattentive score range: 0-27 Total Hyperactive/Impulsive score range: 0-27

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Estimated Difference Between Guan and Placebo
n=207 Participants
Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with guam and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for guan are based on the guan-guan arm both at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and the guan-combo arm at 4 weeks only. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points.
Estimated Difference Between DMPH and Placebo
n=207 Participants
Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with dmph and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for DMPH are based on the placebo-guan arm at 8 weeks. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points.
Estimated Difference Between Placebo and Combo
n=207 Participants
Contrasts based on all observations of patients treated with combo and all patients on placebo controlling for time effects. For placebo this included patients in the guan-guan arm at baseline, the guan-combo arm at baseline, and the placebo-DMPH arm at baseline and 4 weeks, while the estimates for DMPH are based on the guan-combo arm at 8 weeks. Participant specific effects and time effects are controlled for based on estimates from all participants and all time points.
ADHD IV Rating Scale (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale)
Total ADHD-RS Score
-7.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.70
-7.99 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.22
-10.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.99
ADHD IV Rating Scale (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale)
Inattentive Subscale
-4.14 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
-4.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.71
-5.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
ADHD IV Rating Scale (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale)
Hyperactive Impulsive Subscale
-3.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
-4.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
-5.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.12

Adverse Events

Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 66 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 66 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 69 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Guan-Guan+Placebo
n=68 participants at risk
week 1-4: Guanfacine weeks 5-8: Guanfacine+Placebo
Group 2: Placebo-Placebo+DMPH
n=69 participants at risk
week 1-4: Placebo week 5-8: Placebo+DMPH
Group 3: Guan-Guan+DMPH
n=70 participants at risk
week 1-4: Guanfacine week 5-8: Guanfacine+DMPH (comb)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
16.2%
11/68 • Number of events 11
14.5%
10/69 • Number of events 10
14.3%
10/70 • Number of events 10
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
27.9%
19/68 • Number of events 19
26.1%
18/69 • Number of events 18
22.9%
16/70 • Number of events 16
Psychiatric disorders
Headache
50.0%
34/68 • Number of events 34
33.3%
23/69 • Number of events 23
32.9%
23/70 • Number of events 23
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
22.1%
15/68 • Number of events 15
17.4%
12/69 • Number of events 12
25.7%
18/70 • Number of events 18
Psychiatric disorders
Sedation
17.6%
12/68 • Number of events 12
5.8%
4/69 • Number of events 4
22.9%
16/70 • Number of events 16
Psychiatric disorders
Somnolence
23.5%
16/68 • Number of events 16
4.3%
3/69 • Number of events 3
21.4%
15/70 • Number of events 15
Psychiatric disorders
Affect Lability
10.3%
7/68 • Number of events 7
20.3%
14/69 • Number of events 14
11.4%
8/70 • Number of events 8
General disorders
Insomnia
26.5%
18/68 • Number of events 18
29.0%
20/69 • Number of events 20
34.3%
24/70 • Number of events 24
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Appetite
22.1%
15/68 • Number of events 15
44.9%
31/69 • Number of events 31
35.7%
25/70 • Number of events 25
General disorders
Lethargy
33.8%
23/68 • Number of events 23
13.0%
9/69 • Number of events 9
22.9%
16/70 • Number of events 16
General disorders
Fatigue
32.4%
22/68 • Number of events 22
7.2%
5/69 • Number of events 5
17.1%
12/70 • Number of events 12
Vascular disorders
Dizziness
11.8%
8/68 • Number of events 8
8.7%
6/69 • Number of events 6
10.0%
7/70 • Number of events 7

Additional Information

James T. McCracken, M.D.

University of California, Los Angeles

Phone: 310-825-0470

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place