Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Asian Patients With Hypercholesterolaemia in the UK - Rosuvastatin 5mg Versus Atorvastatin 10mg (NCT NCT00427960)

NCT ID: NCT00427960

Last Updated: 2010-12-16

Results Overview

Calculated as LDL-C at Week 6 - LDL-C at Week 12\] \* 100

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

55 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Results posted on

2010-12-16

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from 25 primary and secondary care centres in the United Kingdom. The first participant was enrolled on 20th December 2006 and the last participant entered the study on 16th November 2007.

Participants entered an initial 6-week dietary run-in/ wash-out period, after which those with a fasting low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of greater than or equal to 4.00 mmol/L and triglycerides (TG) less than 4.52 mmol/L, were randomised to receive treatment with either rosuvastatin 5 mg plus atorvatstatin , or atorvastatin 10mg

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 10 mg
Overall Study
STARTED
30
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
28
21
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 10 mg
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
3
Overall Study
Other
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Study of Asian Patients With Hypercholesterolaemia in the UK - Rosuvastatin 5mg Versus Atorvastatin 10mg

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
Total
n=55 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=7 Participants
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
24.0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
31.0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Calculated as LDL-C at Week 6 - LDL-C at Week 12\] \* 100

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
Percentage Change in Low Density Lipoprotein - Cholesterol (LDL-C)
33.28 Percent Change in LDL-C
36.92 Percent Change in LDL-C

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (Baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the General Medical Services (GMS) Contract Target of Total Cholesterol (TC) <5 mmol/L
50 Percentage of Participants
64 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the Joint British Societies' Guideline (JBS 2) Targets of TC <4 mmol/L and LDL-C <2 mmol/L
16 Percentage of Participants
28 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Risk categories are: Symptomatic Asymptomatic, total risk \<5% Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C\<3 mmol/L and baseline TC\<5 mmol/L Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C ≥3 mmol/L or baseline TC ≥5 mmol/L Patients are defined as symptomatic if they meet at least 1 of the following criteria: History of cardiovascular disease Type II diabetes or diabetes of unknown type Baseline TC ≥8 mmol/l Baseline LDL-C ≥6 mmol/l Baseline systolic BP ≥180 mmHg Baseline diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg Total risk is derived from age, sex, TC, systolic BP and smoking status.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the European (EAS) Targets of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.00 mmol/L, Depending on Risk Category, and the Combined LDL-C and TC Target of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.0 mmol/L and TC<4.5 or 5.0 mmol/L, Both Depending on Risk Category.
43 Percentage of Participants
48 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline(week6) in TC
-23.03 Percent Change in TC
-26.88 Percent Change in TC

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
4.46 Percent Change in HDL-C
3.15 Percent Change in HDL-C

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the Joint British Societies Guideline (JBS 2) Target of TC <4 mmol/L
13 Percentage of Participants
12 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6)in Non-HDL-C
-29.72 Percent Change in Non-HDL-C
-34.09 Percent Change in Non-HDL-C

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in Apolipoprotein-B (ApoB)
-25.96 Percent Change in ApoB
-28.67 Percent Change in ApoB

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in Apolipoprotein-A1 (ApoA1)
-0.55 Percent Change in ApoA1
1.89 Percent Change in ApoA1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6)in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
-34.75 Percent Change in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
-38.45 Percent Change in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in TC/HDL-C Ratio
-24.99 Percent Change in TC/HDL-C Ratio
-28.42 Percent Change in TC/HDL-C Ratio

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline(Week 6) in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
-31.05 Percent Change in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
-35.48 Percent Change in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Derived according to the following formula: 100\*\[Lipid at week 12 - Lipid at week 6\]/Lipid at week 6

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage Change From Baseline (Week 6) in ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio
-22.89 Percent Change in ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio
-28.75 Percent Change in ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients).

Risk categories are: Symptomatic Asymptomatic, total risk \<5% Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C\<3 mmol/L and baseline TC\<5 mmol/L Asymptomatic, total risk ≥5%, baseline LDL-C ≥3 mmol/L or baseline TC ≥5 mmol/L Patients are defined as symptomatic if they meet at least 1 of the following criteria: History of cardiovascular disease Type II diabetes or diabetes of unknown type Baseline TC ≥8 mmol/l Baseline LDL-C ≥6 mmol/l Baseline systolic BP ≥180 mmHg Baseline diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg Total risk is derived from age, sex, TC, systolic BP and smoking status.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Rosuvastatin
n=30 Participants
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
n=25 Participants
atorvastatin 10 mg
The Percentage of Participants Reaching the European (EAS) Targets of LDL-C<2.5 or 3.00 mmol/L, Depending on Risk Category.
56.7 Percentage of Participants
56.0 Percentage of Participants

Adverse Events

Rosuvastatin

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Atorvastatin

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 10 mg
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular Accident
3.3%
1/30
0.00%
0/30

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 5 mg
Atorvastatin
atorvastatin 10 mg
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
10.0%
3/30
4.0%
1/25
Nervous system disorders
Headache
3.3%
1/30
8.0%
2/25

Additional Information

Gerard Lynch

Astrazeneca

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER