Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (NCT NCT00425555)
NCT ID: NCT00425555
Last Updated: 2021-08-20
Results Overview
Skin response was primarily classified based on an assessment using mSWAT, provided there was documented evidence of stable disease or better in lymph node/viscera.The mSWAT is a tool specifically developed to evaluate the extent of skin disease in CTCL (Olsen et al 2007). Responses in the skin based on SWAT are defined as: * Complete Response (CR): no evidence of skin disease * Partial Response (PR): ≥ 50% decrease of the modified SWAT score compared with baseline * Stable Disease (SD): Neither CR, PR, or PD as compared with baseline, i.e. change from baseline is less than a 50% decrease but also less than a 25 % increase in the modified SWAT score * Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 25% increase in the modified SWAT score compared with baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
139 participants
Baseline up to 6 Months of Follow up
2021-08-20
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 41 centers in 12 countries.
A total 139 Participants were enrolled in the Study. No Patients completed treatment. All patients discontinued the treatment on this study and 136 patients discontinued the study (97.8%). The remaining three patients discontinued the study treatment were immediately transferred to another program.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
Participants received Panobinostat 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) capsule orally, once a day (OD) on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) capsule orally, once a day (OD) on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
79
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
79
|
60
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
Participants received Panobinostat 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) capsule orally, once a day (OD) on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 milligrams per day (mg/day) capsule orally, once a day (OD) on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
11
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative problems
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
New cancer therapy
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Disease progression
|
36
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
25
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Total
n=139 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.70 • n=5 Participants
|
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51 • n=7 Participants
|
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 6 Months of Follow upPopulation: The analysis was performed in Full Analysis Set (FAS) population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Skin response was primarily classified based on an assessment using mSWAT, provided there was documented evidence of stable disease or better in lymph node/viscera.The mSWAT is a tool specifically developed to evaluate the extent of skin disease in CTCL (Olsen et al 2007). Responses in the skin based on SWAT are defined as: * Complete Response (CR): no evidence of skin disease * Partial Response (PR): ≥ 50% decrease of the modified SWAT score compared with baseline * Stable Disease (SD): Neither CR, PR, or PD as compared with baseline, i.e. change from baseline is less than a 50% decrease but also less than a 25 % increase in the modified SWAT score * Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 25% increase in the modified SWAT score compared with baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate of Participants Using the Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT)
|
16.7 percentage
Interval 8.1 to 25.0
|
20.3 percentage
Interval 10.8 to 32.3
|
18.5 percentage
Interval 11.4 to 24.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Estimate of the response rate of participants with resistant cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) treated with Panobinostat using the mSWAT skin scores and 95% CI will be analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Overall Response Rate Using mSWAT Skin Score
mSWAT skin response (CR/PR)flare considered as disease progression ( f.i.p ) - Number of responders
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
The Overall Response Rate Using mSWAT Skin Score
Physician's Global Assessment- Responder (CR/PR)
|
15 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Time to response were summarized. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to progression was performed, including estimation and 95% confidence interval of the median time to progression and progression-free survival.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Response for Responders
|
69.5 Days
Interval 29.0 to 141.0
|
85.5 Days
Interval 29.0 to 115.0
|
82.0 Days
Interval 30.0 to 113.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Duration of response and time to response were summarized. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to progression was performed, including estimation and 95% confidence interval of the median time to progression and progression-free survival.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DOS)
|
170.0 Days
Interval 86.0 to 294.0
|
NA Days
Interval 84.0 to
There were an insufficient number of participants with events and therefore the Median and Upper limit of the 95% CI for the duration of response could not be calculated.
|
280.0 Days
Interval 115.0 to 311.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
PFS is defined as time from first dose of study treatment to progression or death due to any cause, based on modified European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria per Investigator's assessment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
|
127.0 months
Interval 87.0 to 197.0
|
113.0 months
Interval 85.0 to 142.0
|
114.0 months
Interval 87.0 to 143.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Skin index measurement (Skindex-29) was a self-administered 29-item dermatology patient-reported outcome measure that explores the domains of Functioning, Emotions and Symptoms. Data from the Skindex-29 came from the "Dermatology Survey" page. Scoring of the Skindex-29 was performed as per the developers' scoring algorithms. The score for each dimension was found by adding responses of 1 to 5 for each question, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The Skindex-29 yields three scale scores that assess emotions scores range from 29 to 116, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life. Average sub-scores for emotions, physical symptoms, and functioning was displayed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 4
|
40.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.87
|
34.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.59
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 5
|
35.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.19
|
34.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.53
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 6
|
34.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.72
|
35.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.74
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 7
|
39.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.98
|
36.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.61
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 8
|
39.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.03
|
35.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.39
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Baseline
|
52.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.66
|
50.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.26
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 2
|
48.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.79
|
46.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.18
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 3
|
45.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.53
|
44.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.37
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 10
|
43.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.48
|
43.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.10
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 12
|
42.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.80
|
43.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.29
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 9
|
44.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.09
|
32.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.36
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Emotions From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 11
|
48.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.92
|
43.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.86
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population will include all participants enrolled into the study.
Skindex-29 was a self-administered 29-item dermatology patient-reported outcome measure that explores the domains of Functioning, Emotions and Symptoms. Data from the Skindex-29 came from the "Dermatology Survey" page. Scoring of the Skindex-29 was performed as per the developers' scoring algorithms. The score for each dimension was found by adding responses of 1 to 5 for each question, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The Skindex-29 yields three scale scores that assess functioning scores range from 29 to 116, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life. Average sub-scores for emotions, physical symptoms, and functioning was displayed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Baseline
|
46.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.44
|
44.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.33
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 5
|
32.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.35
|
31.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.38
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 6
|
33.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.79
|
29.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.25
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 7
|
33.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.04
|
28.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.98
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 8
|
34.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.73
|
30.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.16
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 9
|
37.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.28
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.54
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 10
|
35.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.21
|
41.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 11
|
40.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.47
|
38.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.46
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 12
|
26.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.79
|
36.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.95
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 2
|
43.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.27
|
43.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.53
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 3
|
42.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.58
|
39.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.38
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Functioning From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 4
|
38.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.91
|
30.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.91
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 12, an average of 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population was defined according to the intention-to-treat principle. This population included all participants enrolled into the study.
Skindex-29 was a self-administered 29-item dermatology patient-reported outcome measure that explores the domains of Functioning, Emotions and Symptoms. Data from the Skindex-29 came from the "Dermatology Survey" page. Scoring of the Skindex-29 was performed as per the developers' scoring algorithms. The score for each dimension was found by adding responses of 1 to 5 for each question, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The Skindex-29 yields three scale scores that assess physical symptoms scores range from 29 to 116, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life. Average sub-scores for emotions, physical symptoms, and functioning was displayed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Baseline
|
60.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.03
|
55.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.35
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 2
|
51.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
47.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.28
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 3
|
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.92
|
42.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.72
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 4
|
47.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.16
|
35.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.66
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 5
|
43.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.96
|
35.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.81
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 6
|
43.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.72
|
36.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.02
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 7
|
45.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.67
|
37.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.66
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 8
|
42.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.45
|
36.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.29
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 9
|
47.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.42
|
35.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.79
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 10
|
46.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.11
|
47.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.17
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 11
|
46.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.04
|
48.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.44
|
—
|
|
Skindex-29 Measurements of Average Sub-scores for Physical Symptoms From Baseline up to Cycle 12
Cycle 12
|
37.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.52
|
45.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.93
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1-2, and 3-4 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 8Population: The analysis was performed in PK population, defined as all participants who provide at least one post-dose PK plasma sample. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed drug concentration observed in plasma over all PK sample concentrations. It will be obtained from the Cmax parameter calculated by WinNonlin®. If there is no measurable concentration in the subject's PK profile, then Cmax will be missing for that subject. Cmax will be reported in units of ng/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Panobinostat
Day 8
|
13.490 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6.4529
|
—
|
—
|
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Panobinostat
Day 1
|
11.379 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6.6608
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1-2, and 3-4 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 8Population: The analysis was performed in PAS population, defined as all participants who provide at least one post-dose PK plasma sample. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Tmax is defined as the time at which the Cmax occurs. It will be obtained from the Tmax parameter calculated by WinNonlin®. If there is no measurable Cmax in the subject's PK profile, then Tmax will be missing for that subject. Tmax will be reported in units of h.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of Panobinostat
Day 1
|
1.5 h (hours)
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of Panobinostat
Day 8
|
1.5 h (hours)
Interval 0.25 to 3.5
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1-2, and 3-4 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 8Population: The analysis was performed in PAS population, defined as all participants who provide at least one post-dose PK plasma sample. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
AUC is defined as the area under concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 48 hours. AUC (0-inf) is defined as the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 1 - AUC0-24
|
110.138 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 58.0235
|
—
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 8 - AUC0-24
|
134.033 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 61.5203
|
—
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 1 - AUC0-48
|
132.019 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 69.3453
|
—
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 8 - AUC0-48
|
159.750 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 64.2278
|
—
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 1- AUC (0-inf)
|
134.828 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 64.9389
|
—
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration AUC0-24, AUC0-48 and AUC 0-infinity of Panobinostat
Day 8 - AUC (0-inf)
|
162.673 ng*hr/ml
Standard Deviation 65.0664
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1-2, and 3-4 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 8Population: The analysis was performed in PAS population, defined as all participants who provide at least one post-dose PK plasma sample. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Time of Clast (Tlast) will be obtained from the Tlast parameter calculated by WinNonlin®. If there is no measurable concentration in the subject's PK profile, then Tlast will be missing for that participants. Tlast will be reported in units of h.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time of Clast (Tlast) of Panobinostat
Day 1
|
47.9 Hours
Interval 23.4 to 49.5
|
—
|
—
|
|
Time of Clast (Tlast) of Panobinostat
Day 8
|
NA Hours
Interval 16.8 to 47.0
below the level of detection
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1-2, and 3-4 hours post dose on Day 1 and Day 8Population: The analysis was performed in PAS population, defined as all participants who provide at least one post-dose PK plasma sample. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Clast is defined as the Last observed (quantifiable) plasma concentration (Clast), in units of ng/mL. Blood samples were collected to assess Clast.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=139 Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
All Participants
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). The treatment duration was not fixed. Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Last Observed Plasma Concentration (Clast) of Panobinostat
Day 1
|
0.632 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.9737
|
—
|
—
|
|
Last Observed Plasma Concentration (Clast) of Panobinostat
Day 8
|
1.524 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.9076
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Bexarotene Exposed
Bexarotene Naive
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 participants at risk
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery insufficiency
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer perforation
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Hypothermia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden cardiac death
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related sepsis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritoneal abscess
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rotavirus infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin bacterial infection
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Superinfection
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural complication
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram ST segment depression
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram ST-T segment abnormal
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram abnormal
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram repolarisation abnormality
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Failure to thrive
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma pancreas
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bowen's disease
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm malignant
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis exfoliative
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery stenosis
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral embolism
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Bexarotene Exposed
n=79 participants at risk
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
Bexarotene Naive
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received Panobinostat 20 mg/day capsule orally, OD on 3 days per week. (Monday, Wednesday and Friday or alternative Day 1, 3 and 5). Participants continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
21.5%
17/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
17.7%
14/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
16.7%
10/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
50.6%
40/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
38.3%
23/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
10.1%
8/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
18.3%
11/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
57.0%
45/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
63.3%
38/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
7.6%
6/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
10.1%
8/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
40.5%
32/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
36.7%
22/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
11.7%
7/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
27.8%
22/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
16.7%
10/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
13.3%
8/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
32.9%
26/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
48.3%
29/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
20.0%
12/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
15.2%
12/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
13.3%
8/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.3%
1/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.1%
8/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
8.9%
7/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
7.6%
6/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
19.0%
15/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
13.3%
8/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
7.6%
6/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
7.6%
6/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
6.3%
5/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
0.00%
0/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
6.3%
5/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
24.1%
19/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
28.3%
17/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
8.9%
7/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
13.9%
11/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
13.3%
8/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
16.7%
10/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
15.2%
12/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
13.9%
11/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
6.3%
5/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
17.7%
14/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
13.9%
11/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
10.1%
8/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
12.7%
10/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
16.5%
13/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
20.0%
12/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
20.3%
16/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
20.0%
12/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
3.3%
2/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
11.7%
7/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
11.4%
9/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
10.0%
6/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
17.7%
14/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
8.9%
7/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
6.3%
5/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
5.0%
3/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
10.1%
8/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
40.5%
32/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
26.7%
16/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.1%
4/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
8.9%
7/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
8.3%
5/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
7.6%
6/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
1.7%
1/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
2.5%
2/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
13.9%
11/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
3.8%
3/79 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
6.7%
4/60 • From Start of the Study up to 7 years approximately
The analysis was performed on Safety analysis population (SAP) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline assessment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place