Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ACZ885 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (NCT NCT00424346)
NCT ID: NCT00424346
Last Updated: 2014-02-10
Results Overview
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Details on each of these components are provided in Outcome Measures 10-16. Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
274 participants
Baseline and Week 12
2014-02-10
Participant Flow
277 patients were randomized in core (CACZ885A2201): 71 were assigned to ACZ885 600 mg intravenous(iv) + 300 mg subcutaneous each 2 weeks(sc q2wk), 66 to ACZ885 300 mg sc q2wk, 69 to ACZ885 150 mg sc q4wk, 71 to placebo. 3 were randomized but not treated. All other 274 (98.9%) were treated and had post-baseline efficacy data.
Enrollment in core \& CACZ885A2201E2 was determined by how many entered first extension study. Study protocols did not mandate that patients continue treatment in the extension phase and furthermore the reason for not continuing from the Core to the Extension phase was not capture. A total of 6.6% completed extensions.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks. Participants in this treatment group who participated in the Extension Phase are represented in the 'Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk' treatment group in the Extension Phase table below.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study
STARTED
|
71
|
64
|
69
|
70
|
|
Core Study
COMPLETED
|
62
|
56
|
65
|
63
|
|
Core Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
8
|
4
|
7
|
|
Extension Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
110
|
59
|
58
|
|
Extension Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
8
|
4
|
3
|
|
Extension Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
102
|
55
|
55
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks. Participants in this treatment group who participated in the Extension Phase are represented in the 'Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk' treatment group in the Extension Phase table below.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
Core Study
Abnormal Laboratory Values
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
|
Core Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Core Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study
Administrative Problems
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Core Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Extension Phase
Adverse Event
|
0
|
9
|
5
|
4
|
|
Extension Phase
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
16
|
14
|
11
|
|
Extension Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
|
Extension Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Extension Phase
Administrative Problems
|
0
|
69
|
32
|
35
|
|
Extension Phase
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Extension Phase
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ACZ885 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=274 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
≥18 - <41 years
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥41 - <65 years
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 participants
n=4 Participants
|
143 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 - <75 years
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥75 years
|
NA participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
94 participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 participants
n=4 Participants
|
185 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients as randomized that received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. The number of patients in the analysis includes those with ACR50 evaluation. Last observation carried forward was applied for all the component variables.
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Details on each of these components are provided in Outcome Measures 10-16. Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Week 12
|
9.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.31 to 2.65
|
23.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.91 to 6.05
|
26.5 percentage of participants
Interval 1.12 to 7.05
|
11.4 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124Population: The Extension Study intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients who entered the extension study and who received at least one dose of study drug in the extension studies. The number of patients in the analysis at each time point (N) includes those with ACR20 evaluation data available.
Participants were defined as ACR20 responders if they had at least a 20% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR20 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=110 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=59 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 24 [N=105, 57, 56]
|
52.4 percentage of participants
|
64.9 percentage of participants
|
66.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 36 [N=100, 48, 49]
|
57.0 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
63.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 48 [N=95, 43, 47]
|
66.3 percentage of participants
|
81.4 percentage of participants
|
72.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 60 [N=87, 40, 42]
|
60.9 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
73.8 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 72 [N=66, 34, 27]
|
62.1 percentage of participants
|
76.5 percentage of participants
|
74.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 88 [N=43, 25, 23]
|
67.4 percentage of participants
|
72.0 percentage of participants
|
82.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 100 [N=21, 12, 14]
|
81.0 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
91.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
76.9 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
End of Study Visit [N=103, 53, 54]
|
51.5 percentage of participants
|
54.7 percentage of participants
|
61.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124Population: The Extension Study intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients who entered the extension study and who received at least one dose of study drug in the extension studies. The number of patients in the analysis at each time point (N) includes those with ACR50 evaluation data available.
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=110 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=59 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 24 [N=106, 57, 56]
|
18.9 percentage of participants
|
29.8 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 36 [N=100, 48, 49]
|
24.0 percentage of participants
|
31.3 percentage of participants
|
32.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 48 [N=95, 43, 47]
|
34.7 percentage of participants
|
48.8 percentage of participants
|
34.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 60 [N=87, 40, 42]
|
34.5 percentage of participants
|
42.5 percentage of participants
|
42.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 72 [N=66, 34, 27]
|
37.9 percentage of participants
|
58.8 percentage of participants
|
48.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 88 [N=43, 25, 23]
|
39.5 percentage of participants
|
44.0 percentage of participants
|
52.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
47.6 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
57.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
End of Study Visit [N=103, 53, 54]
|
23.3 percentage of participants
|
35.8 percentage of participants
|
35.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124Population: The Extension Study intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients who entered the extension study and who received at least one dose of study drug in the extension studies. The number of patients in the analysis at each time point (N) includes those with ACR70 evaluation data available.
Participants were defined as ACR70 responders if they had at least a 70% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR70 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=110 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=59 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 24 [N=106, 57, 56]
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
10.5 percentage of participants
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 36 [N=100, 48, 49]
|
7.0 percentage of participants
|
4.2 percentage of participants
|
12.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 48 [N=96, 43, 47]
|
10.4 percentage of participants
|
9.3 percentage of participants
|
6.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 60 [N=87, 40, 42]
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
17.5 percentage of participants
|
19.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 72 [N=66, 34, 27]
|
15.2 percentage of participants
|
20.6 percentage of participants
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 88 [N=44, 25, 23]
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
16.0 percentage of participants
|
17.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 100 [N=21, 14, 14]
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
End of Study Visit [N=103, 54, 54]
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 72 and 112Population: The Extension Study intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients who entered the extension study and who received at least one dose of study drug in the extension studies. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a combined index to measure the disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and includes the following variables: * The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; * C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L; * Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=110 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=59 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 During the Extension Phase
Week 24 [N=103, 56, 54]
|
-1.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.171
|
-1.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.333
|
-1.93 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.474
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 During the Extension Phase
Week 72 [N=63, 31, 26]
|
-2.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.302
|
-2.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.232
|
-2.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 During the Extension Phase
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-2.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.110
|
-2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.252
|
-2.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.916
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 During the Extension Phase
End of Study Visit [N=100, 52, 49}
|
-1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.434
|
-1.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.551
|
-1.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.621
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of patients in the analysis includes those with ACR50 evaluation. Last observation carried forward was applied for all the component variables. "N" indicates the number of patients included at each time point.
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Responders at Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Responders at Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
7.8 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Responders at Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
4.2 percentage of participants
|
17.2 percentage of participants
|
17.4 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of patients in the analysis includes those with ACR20 evaluation. Last observation carried forward was applied for all the component variables. "N" indicates the number of patients included at each time point.
Participants were defined as ACR20 responders if they had at least a 20% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered ACR20 non-responders if they failed the ACR20 criteria. Patients who prematurely discontinued the study due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
17.1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.06 to 4.74
|
29.7 percentage of participants
Interval 1.27 to 5.82
|
23.2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.37 to 6.18
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 4 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
29.6 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 8 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
35.2 percentage of participants
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
42.6 percentage of participants
|
27.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 12 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
43.7 percentage of participants
|
48.4 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of patients in the analysis includes those with ACR70 evaluation. Last observation carried forward was applied for all the component variables. "N" indicates the number of patients included at each time point.
Participants were defined as ACR70 responders if they had at least a 70% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered ACR70 non-responders if they failed the ACR70 criteria. Patients who prematurely discontinued the study due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.27 to 10.71
|
1.6 percentage of participants
Interval 0.14 to 7.61
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.37 to 12.12
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
4.7 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders
Responders at Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
4.2 percentage of participants
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of patients in the analysis includes those with ACR evaluation. Last observation carried forward was applied for all the component variables.
To assess differences between the level of clinical response attained and not just whether the patient did or did not achieve a particular level of response, participants were categorized as follows: 1. Did not attain an ACR20 response; 2. Attained a 20% but not a 50% response; 3. Attained a 50% but not a 70% response; 4. Attained a 70% or greater response. A participant was considered as improved according to the ACR20, ACR50 or ACR70 criteria if they had at least a 20, 50 or 70% improvement from Baseline, respectively, in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\] score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at Week 12
No response
|
40 participants
|
33 participants
|
34 participants
|
50 participants
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at Week 12
ACR20 - not ACR50 response
|
24 participants
|
16 participants
|
16 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at Week 12
ACR50 - not ACR70 response
|
4 participants
|
13 participants
|
14 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at Week 12
ACR70 response
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for swelling: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2). Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
-2.4 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.53
|
-2.7 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
-3.1 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.54
|
-2.3 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-3.4 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.55
|
-4.0 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.58
|
-4.6 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
-3.0 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.0 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.58
|
-4.4 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
-4.9 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.59
|
-3.3 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.6 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.64
|
-5.3 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.67
|
-5.2 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.65
|
-3.4 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for tenderness: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2). Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
-3.0 tender joints
Standard Error 0.68
|
-2.1 tender joints
Standard Error 0.71
|
-3.6 tender joints
Standard Error 0.68
|
-3.2 tender joints
Standard Error 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.1 tender joints
Standard Error 0.77
|
-4.0 tender joints
Standard Error 0.80
|
-5.0 tender joints
Standard Error 0.78
|
-4.2 tender joints
Standard Error 0.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.6 tender joints
Standard Error 0.79
|
-4.7 tender joints
Standard Error 0.83
|
-5.4 tender joints
Standard Error 0.80
|
-4.7 tender joints
Standard Error 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.3 tender joints
Standard Error 0.86
|
-4.8 tender joints
Standard Error 0.90
|
-6.3 tender joints
Standard Error 0.87
|
-4.5 tender joints
Standard Error 0.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by
The patient's assessment of pain was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in pain intensity. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 68, 70]
|
-6.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.20
|
-8.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.29
|
-8.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.23
|
-4.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-9.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.40
|
-9.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.52
|
-11.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.45
|
-5.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-12.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.66
|
-12.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.80
|
-14.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.72
|
-7.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-14.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.72
|
-15.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
-17.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.78
|
-10.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no arthritis activity (0) to maximal arthritis activity (100), after the question "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, draw a line on the scale for how well you are doing". The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in assessment of disease activity. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 68, 70]
|
-6.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.12
|
-7.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.21
|
-7.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.15
|
-5.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 4 [N= 71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-9.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.28
|
-11.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.39
|
-12.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.33
|
-6.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 8 [N= 71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-13.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.63
|
-15.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.76
|
-13.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.68
|
-6.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 12 [N= 71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-14.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
-17.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.74
|
-17.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.66
|
-10.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no arthritis activity (0) to maximal arthritis activity (100). To enhance objectivity, the physician was not aware of the specific patient's global assessment of disease activity when performing their own assessment on that patient. The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in assessment of disease activity. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 68, 69]
|
-13.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.21
|
-14.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.34
|
-15.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
-9.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-17.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.40
|
-20.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.55
|
-20.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.46
|
-12.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-20.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.68
|
-22.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.86
|
-23.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.75
|
-16.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-21.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.82
|
-24.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.01
|
-26.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.90
|
-17.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The patient health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was used to assess the physical ability and functional status of participants as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (Score=0) to 'unable to do' (Score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in disability status. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Week 2 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
HsCRP is a marker for inflammation and was measured from blood samples to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. Least squares means (LSMs) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels
Week 2 [N=69, 64, 67, 70]
|
-5.6 mg/L
Standard Error 1.72
|
-5.8 mg/L
Standard Error 1.79
|
-4.7 mg/L
Standard Error 1.75
|
-1.7 mg/L
Standard Error 1.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-5.2 mg/L
Standard Error 1.69
|
-7.4 mg/L
Standard Error 1.78
|
-6.5 mg/L
Standard Error 1.72
|
-1.7 mg/L
Standard Error 1.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-4.3 mg/L
Standard Error 1.72
|
-6.9 mg/L
Standard Error 1.82
|
-3.5 mg/L
Standard Error 1.75
|
0.0 mg/L
Standard Error 1.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-5.6 mg/L
Standard Error 1.89
|
-3.4 mg/L
Standard Error 1.99
|
-8.0 mg/L
Standard Error 1.92
|
-0.7 mg/L
Standard Error 1.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a combined index to measure the disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and includes the following variables: * The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; * C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L; * Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. Least squares means (LSMs) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline DAS28 value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=68 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28
Week 2 [N=69, 64, 66, 70]
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 68, 70]
|
-1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) indirectly measures how much inflammation is in the body. A higher ESR is indicative of increased inflammation. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Week 2 [N=68, 64, 67, 69]
|
-9.0 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 12.85
|
-8.2 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 15.97
|
-9.0 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 12.43
|
-2.9 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 11.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Week 4 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-9.2 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 15.11
|
-9.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.43
|
-11.8 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 14.71
|
-2.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 12.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Week 8 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-11.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 16.28
|
-12.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 16.02
|
-12.8 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 13.89
|
-4.4 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 15.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Week 12 [N=71, 64, 69, 70]
|
-11.2 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.20
|
-11.1 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.12
|
-15.1 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 14.96
|
-4.1 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 16.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Rheumatoid factor (RF) is an autoantibody (antibody directed against an organism's own tissues) that is an indicator of inflammation and rheumatoid arthritis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor Concentration
Week 4 [N=70, 62, 68, 67]
|
-6.7 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 71.53
|
-10.6 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 99.36
|
-16.1 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 144.18
|
-0.9 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 85.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor Concentration
Week 8 [N=70, 63, 69, 70]
|
-2.6 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 117.30
|
22.7 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 134.66
|
-57.1 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 442.24
|
6.0 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 91.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor Concentration
Week 12 [N=70, 64, 69, 70]
|
2.0 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 135.70
|
29.7 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 144.91
|
-50.7 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 531.68
|
16.9 kIU/L
Standard Deviation 110.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The SF-36 measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of eight subscales (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health) which can be aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score. Scores for each subscale range from 0 to 10, and the composite scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical component: Week 2 [N=61, 61, 59, 64]
|
1.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.013
|
0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.648
|
2.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.999
|
2.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.996
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical component: Week 4 [N=65, 62, 63, 67]
|
2.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.582
|
2.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.972
|
3.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.406
|
2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.134
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical component: Week 8 [N=67, 62, 63, 68]
|
2.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.528
|
2.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.331
|
4.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.757
|
1.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.464
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical component: Week 12 [N=68, 62, 63, 68]
|
4.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.519
|
3.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.847
|
5.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.612
|
2.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.846
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental component: Week 2 [N=61, 61, 59, 64]
|
0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.831
|
2.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.425
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.486
|
0.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.234
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental component: Week 4 [N=65, 62, 63, 67]
|
2.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.660
|
2.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.364
|
2.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.634
|
1.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.331
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental component: Week 8 [N=67, 62, 63, 68]
|
2.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.505
|
2.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.760
|
3.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.307
|
1.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.580
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental component: Week 12 [N=68, 62, 63, 68]
|
1.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.988
|
3.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.927
|
4.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.952
|
0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.294
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT Population, only patients with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline are included in the analysis. The number of patients included at each time point is indicated by "N". Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The fatigue subscale of the FACIT is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Participants respond to each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much) based on their experience of fatigue during the past 2 weeks. The scale score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. FACIT Fatigue subscale scores range from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. Least squares means (LSMs) were derived from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and center with baseline FACIT-F value as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=71 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=64 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=69 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=70 Participants
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Week 2 [N=62, 63, 63, 64]
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
3.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Week 4 [N=66, 64, 66, 67]
|
3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
3.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Week 8 [N=67, 64, 66, 67]
|
4.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
4.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
4.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Week 12 [N=67, 64, 66, 67]
|
4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
5.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Study (up to 124 weeks)Population: Extension Study ITT population.
To assess differences between the level of clinical response attained and not just whether the patient did or did not achieve a particular level of response, patients were categorized as follows: 1. Did not attain an ACR20 response; 2. Attained a 20% but not a 50% response; 3. Attained a 50% but not a 70% response; 4. Attained a 70% or greater response. A participant was considered as improved according to the ACR20, ACR50 or ACR70 criteria if they had at least a 20, 50 or 70% improvement from Baseline, respectively, in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\] score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=103 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=53 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=54 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at the End of the Extension Study
No response
|
50 participants
|
24 participants
|
21 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at the End of the Extension Study
ACR20 - not ACR50 response
|
29 participants
|
10 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at the End of the Extension Study
ACR50 - not ACR70 response
|
10 participants
|
10 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at the End of the Extension Study
ACR70 response
|
14 participants
|
9 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for swelling: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=110 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=59 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=105, 58, 55]
|
-6.04 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.892
|
-5.70 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.119
|
-6.93 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.300
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=100, 49, 49]
|
-7.12 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.828
|
-6.79 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.365
|
-7.05 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.726
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=95, 44, 47]
|
-7.72 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.171
|
-7.52 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.622
|
-7.74 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.454
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=89, 40, 43]
|
-7.69 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.670
|
-7.38 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.737
|
-8.65 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.825
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=66, 35, 27]
|
-7.41 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.311
|
-7.94 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.143
|
-7.60 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.678
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=44, 25, 22]
|
-8.38 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.369
|
-7.24 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.666
|
-7.50 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 3.389
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
-8.29 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.285
|
-8.15 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 2.824
|
-7.56 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 2.974
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-7.39 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.308
|
-9.50 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 2.976
|
-5.83 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.636
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-6.50 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 0.707
|
-16.00 swollen joints
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-4.00 swollen joints
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=103, 55, 53]
|
-6.36 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 5.477
|
-5.99 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 4.937
|
-6.67 swollen joints
Standard Deviation 6.350
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for tenderness: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=105 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=55 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=105, 58, 55]
|
-6.93 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.078
|
-8.27 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.555
|
-8.49 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.298
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=100, 49, 49]
|
-7.92 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.793
|
-9.83 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.459
|
-8.95 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.154
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=95, 44, 47]
|
-8.64 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.193
|
-10.75 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.948
|
-10.05 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.321
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=89, 40, 43]
|
-8.52 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.915
|
-11.10 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.484
|
-10.76 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.185
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=66, 35, 27]
|
-8.71 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.556
|
-11.37 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.436
|
-9.56 tender joints
Standard Deviation 4.722
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=44, 25, 22]
|
-10.34 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.995
|
-10.76 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.184
|
-9.98 tender joints
Standard Deviation 4.964
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
-8.53 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.780
|
-12.00 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.307
|
-9.08 tender joints
Standard Deviation 4.989
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-8.47 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.205
|
-13.63 tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.435
|
-9.17 tender joints
Standard Deviation 5.981
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-9.00 tender joints
Standard Deviation 4.243
|
-23.00 tender joints
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-8.00 tender joints
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender 28-joint Count During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=103, 55, 53]
|
-7.93 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.857
|
-8.43 tender joints
Standard Deviation 8.331
|
-8.83 tender joints
Standard Deviation 7.573
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The patient's assessment of pain was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=106 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=57 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=56 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-33.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.38
|
-17.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.39
|
-31.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.93
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=106, 57, 56]
|
-22.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.44
|
-24.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.69
|
-20.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.61
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=100, 48, 48]
|
-21.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.00
|
-28.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.05
|
-24.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.13
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=96, 43, 47]
|
-25.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.08
|
-30.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.94
|
-21.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.02
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=87, 40, 42]
|
-26.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.09
|
-27.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.63
|
-30.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.04
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=66, 34, 27]
|
-29.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.42
|
-35.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.06
|
-26.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.63
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=43, 25, 23]
|
-28.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.42
|
-29.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.23
|
-32.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.84
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
-30.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.60
|
-27.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.14
|
-32.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.15
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-55.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.56
|
-17.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-24.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Intensity During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=103, 53, 54]
|
-19.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.14
|
-21.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.19
|
-20.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.45
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no arthritis activity (0) to maximal arthritis activity (100), after the question "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, draw a line on the scale for how well you are doing". The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in assessment of disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=105 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=57 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=56 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=105, 57, 56]
|
-23.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.12
|
-21.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.21
|
-18.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.42
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=100, 48, 48]
|
-22.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.61
|
-23.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.11
|
-20.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.52
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=96, 43, 47]
|
-25.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.92
|
-27.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.44
|
-23.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.23
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=87, 40, 42]
|
-27.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.08
|
-24.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.23
|
-26.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.63
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=66, 33, 27]
|
-28.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.54
|
-32.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.56
|
-24.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.14
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=43, 25, 23]
|
-28.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.77
|
-30.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.59
|
-29.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.95
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
-34.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.69
|
-27.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.85
|
-31.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.45
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-29.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.05
|
-28.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.01
|
-36.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.84
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-59.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.51
|
-20.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-21.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=103, 52, 54]
|
-20.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.93
|
-19.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.29
|
-18.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.61
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no arthritis activity (0) to maximal arthritis activity (100). To enhance objectivity, the physician was not aware of the specific patient's global assessment of disease activity when performing their own assessment on that patient. The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in assessment of disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=105 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=57 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=55 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=105, 57, 55]
|
-30.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.58
|
-36.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.59
|
-36.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.94
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=98, 48, 48]
|
-31.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.69
|
-41.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.24
|
-37.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.17
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=93, 43, 47]
|
-34.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.60
|
-45.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.09
|
-38.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.99
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=89, 40, 43]
|
-34.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.57
|
-41.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.92
|
-42.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.00
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=66, 34, 27]
|
-37.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.64
|
-44.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.32
|
-43.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.34
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=42, 25, 22]
|
-41.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.81
|
-44.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.42
|
-45.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.00
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 12, 13]
|
-45.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.56
|
-42.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.93
|
-47.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.04
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-45.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.11
|
-51.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.11
|
-29.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.15
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-54.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-49.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-39.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=102, 53, 53]
|
-25.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.23
|
-29.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.95
|
-31.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.28
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
The patient health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was used to assess the physical ability and functional status of participants as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (Score=0) to 'unable to do' (Score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in disability status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=107 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=56 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=106, 58, 56]
|
-0.241 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5430
|
-0.304 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4895
|
-0.239 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5142
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=99, 49, 48]
|
-0.266 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5418
|
-0.347 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5066
|
-0.302 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5511
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=96, 44, 47]
|
-0.322 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5446
|
-0.324 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4988
|
-0.293 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5375
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=86, 40, 42]
|
-0.347 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5552
|
-0.419 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5819
|
-0.425 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6047
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=65, 34, 27]
|
-0.398 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6047
|
-0.441 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5849
|
-0.449 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6338
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=44, 25, 23]
|
-0.472 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5985
|
-0.440 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5218
|
-0.451 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5823
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 13, 14]
|
-0.613 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5504
|
-0.298 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4692
|
-0.563 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7448
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 8, 6]
|
-0.538 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5410
|
-0.406 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6640
|
-0.542 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7100
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
-0.938 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6187
|
-0.625 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
-1.250 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=101, 54, 54]
|
-0.260 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6051
|
-0.322 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5724
|
-0.291 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6259
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
HsCRP is a marker for inflammation and was measured from blood samples to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=106 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=55 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=106, 58, 55]
|
-4.82 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.914
|
-6.45 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.556
|
-9.59 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.388
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=97, 49, 50]
|
-7.76 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.771
|
-4.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.393
|
0.50 mg/L
Standard Deviation 71.610
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=95, 44, 47]
|
-5.61 mg/L
Standard Deviation 22.335
|
-4.63 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.521
|
-11.04 mg/L
Standard Deviation 20.261
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=88, 40, 43]
|
-6.93 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.160
|
0.49 mg/L
Standard Deviation 47.139
|
-7.04 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.638
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=63, 33, 26]
|
-9.02 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.067
|
-5.29 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.219
|
-7.70 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.221
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=44, 24, 22]
|
-8.45 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.060
|
-7.31 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.035
|
-7.65 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.098
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 100 [N=21, 14, 12]
|
-7.29 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.850
|
-2.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.273
|
-10.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 24.539
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 112 [N=13, 9, 6]
|
-5.75 mg/L
Standard Deviation 10.438
|
-1.80 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.838
|
-19.33 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.567
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
Week 124 [N=2, 1, 1]
|
4.95 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.364
|
-22.70 mg/L
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
0.20 mg/L
Standard Deviation NA
Mean based on 1 participant. Standard deviation can not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=101, 57, 52]
|
-7.01 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.934
|
-2.94 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.735
|
-9.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 20.766
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 88.Population: The Extension Study ITT population. At each timepoint, only patients with a value at both Baseline and that timepoint are included (N).
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) indirectly measures how much inflammation is in the body. A higher ESR is indicative of increased inflammation. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
n=105 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
n=58 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
n=54 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 24 [N=105, 58, 54]
|
-14.9 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.31
|
-18.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 14.96
|
-16.8 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.10
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 36 [N=95, 46, 48]
|
-14.5 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.99
|
-13.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 19.09
|
-11.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 25.94
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 48 [N=91, 42, 47]
|
-15.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 20.13
|
-16.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 13.44
|
-17.0 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.81
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 60 [N=85, 39, 43]
|
-17.2 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 19.07
|
-15.8 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 19.08
|
-16.7 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 19.09
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 72 [N=64, 34, 26]
|
-18.6 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.83
|
-15.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 16.39
|
-14.1 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
Week 88 [N=42, 24, 23]
|
-19.7 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.46
|
-13.5 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 16.38
|
-13.3 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 20.89
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Extension Study
End of Study Visit [N=98, 55, 55]
|
-14.9 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.09
|
-14.0 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 17.51
|
-15.9 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.10
|
—
|
Adverse Events
ACZ885 600mg iv + 300mg sc q2wk
ACZ885 300mg sc q2wk
ACZ885 150mg sc q4wk
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ACZ885 600mg iv + 300mg sc q2wk
n=71 participants at risk
ACZ885 600mg iv + 300mg sc q2wk
|
ACZ885 300mg sc q2wk
n=64 participants at risk
ACZ885 300mg sc q2wk
|
ACZ885 150mg sc q4wk
n=69 participants at risk
ACZ885 150mg sc q4wk
|
Placebo
n=70 participants at risk
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia obstructive
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected epidermal cyst
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Epicondylitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Investigations
Tumour marker increased
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot deformity
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hand deformity
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
2.9%
2/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
1.4%
1/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
4.3%
3/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid nodule
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Angiomyolipoma
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma metastatic
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cervical myelopathy
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine haemorrhage
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
1.4%
1/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thromboangiitis obliterans
|
0.00%
0/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis limb
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ACZ885 600mg iv + 300mg sc q2wk
n=71 participants at risk
ACZ885 600mg iv + 300mg sc q2wk
|
ACZ885 300mg sc q2wk
n=64 participants at risk
ACZ885 300mg sc q2wk
|
ACZ885 150mg sc q4wk
n=69 participants at risk
ACZ885 150mg sc q4wk
|
Placebo
n=70 participants at risk
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.0%
5/71
|
9.4%
6/64
|
4.3%
3/69
|
7.1%
5/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
1.4%
1/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.6%
4/71
|
7.8%
5/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
4.2%
3/71
|
4.7%
3/64
|
4.3%
3/69
|
7.1%
5/70
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
4.2%
3/71
|
6.2%
4/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
8.6%
6/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
8.5%
6/71
|
9.4%
6/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
4.3%
3/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
8.5%
6/71
|
3.1%
2/64
|
0.00%
0/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
1.4%
1/71
|
3.1%
2/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
4.3%
3/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
19.7%
14/71
|
18.8%
12/64
|
17.4%
12/69
|
14.3%
10/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
7.0%
5/71
|
0.00%
0/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.5%
6/71
|
12.5%
8/64
|
7.2%
5/69
|
11.4%
8/70
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
9.9%
7/71
|
7.8%
5/64
|
4.3%
3/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
8.5%
6/71
|
4.7%
3/64
|
7.2%
5/69
|
8.6%
6/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.8%
2/71
|
6.2%
4/64
|
4.3%
3/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.8%
2/71
|
3.1%
2/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
5.6%
4/71
|
6.2%
4/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
0.00%
0/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
4.2%
3/71
|
12.5%
8/64
|
8.7%
6/69
|
10.0%
7/70
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.00%
0/71
|
4.7%
3/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.8%
2/71
|
3.1%
2/64
|
1.4%
1/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.3%
8/71
|
6.2%
4/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
5.7%
4/70
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.2%
3/71
|
7.8%
5/64
|
7.2%
5/69
|
7.1%
5/70
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/71
|
1.6%
1/64
|
5.8%
4/69
|
1.4%
1/70
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
4.2%
3/71
|
9.4%
6/64
|
4.3%
3/69
|
2.9%
2/70
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER