Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin Infections (NCT NCT00424190)
NCT ID: NCT00424190
Last Updated: 2017-03-14
Results Overview
Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary. Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of cSSSI due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI. Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
COMPLETED
PHASE3
698 participants
8-15 days after the end of treatment
2017-03-14
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited worldwide from February 2007 to November 2007
Patients were screened for up to 24 hours
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
351
|
347
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
329
|
317
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
22
|
30
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrew consent
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Noncompliance
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Request of sponsor or investigator
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Diagnosis of osteomyelitis
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
15
|
21
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin Infections
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
n=351 Participants
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=347 Participants
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
Total
n=698 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.17 • n=5 Participants
|
47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.01 • n=7 Participants
|
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
57 participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 participants
n=7 Participants
|
129 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<18 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=18 years and < 65 years
|
294 participants
n=5 Participants
|
275 participants
n=7 Participants
|
569 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
129 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
260 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
220 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
218 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
438 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
|
268 participants
n=5 Participants
|
270 participants
n=7 Participants
|
538 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 participants
n=7 Participants
|
160 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after the end of treatmentPopulation: MITT (Modified Intent to Treat) - Any randomized subjects that received any amount of study drug
Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary. Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of cSSSI due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI. Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
n=351 Participants
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=347 Participants
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Clinical Cure
|
304 participants
|
297 participants
|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Clinical Failure
|
29 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Indeterminate
|
18 participants
|
29 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last day of study drug administrationOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 21 to 35 days after the last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 21 to 35 days after the last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through TOC visitComparisons of the number of participants with Adverse Events
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
n=351 participants at risk
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=347 participants at risk
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hematochezia
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischemia
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer hemorrhage
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Generalized edema
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.57%
2/351 • Number of events 2
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridial infection
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Renal abscess
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram ST segment elevation
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bronchial carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm malignant
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischemic attack
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/347
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
|
0.00%
0/351
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection
n=351 participants at risk
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered IV over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=347 participants at risk
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.7%
20/351 • Number of events 20
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
4.6%
16/347 • Number of events 16
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.1%
18/351 • Number of events 18
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
3.7%
13/347 • Number of events 13
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus generalized
|
3.7%
13/351 • Number of events 13
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
4.6%
16/347 • Number of events 16
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
3.4%
12/351 • Number of events 12
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
3.2%
11/347 • Number of events 11
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.4%
12/351 • Number of events 12
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.3%
8/347 • Number of events 8
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.1%
11/351 • Number of events 11
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
8.4%
29/347 • Number of events 29
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.6%
9/351 • Number of events 9
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.6%
9/347 • Number of events 9
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.3%
8/351 • Number of events 8
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
1.7%
6/347 • Number of events 6
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.3%
8/351 • Number of events 8
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
1.7%
6/347 • Number of events 6
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
1.4%
5/351 • Number of events 5
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.6%
9/347 • Number of events 9
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.1%
4/351 • Number of events 4
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.6%
9/347 • Number of events 9
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.85%
3/351 • Number of events 3
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.6%
9/347 • Number of events 9
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.85%
3/351 • Number of events 3
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.0%
7/347 • Number of events 7
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.0%
7/347 • Number of events 7
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.28%
1/351 • Number of events 1
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
2.0%
7/347 • Number of events 7
All safety analysis was performed on the Safety Population, those subjects that had received any amount of the actual study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place