Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin Infections (NCT NCT00423657)
NCT ID: NCT00423657
Last Updated: 2017-03-14
Results Overview
Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary. Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI. Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
COMPLETED
PHASE3
680 participants
8-15 days after last dose of study drug administration
2017-03-14
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited worldwide from March 2007 to December 2007
Patients were screened for up to 24 hours
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
342
|
338
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
316
|
313
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
25
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Request of sponsor/investigator
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrew consent
|
10
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
15
|
16
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparative Study of Ceftaroline vs. Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin Infections
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
n=342 Participants
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=338 Participants
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
Total
n=680 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<=18 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>18 and < 65 years
|
281 participants
n=5 Participants
|
291 participants
n=7 Participants
|
572 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 participants
n=7 Participants
|
108 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.98 • n=5 Participants
|
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.07 • n=7 Participants
|
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
255 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
224 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
201 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
425 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
279 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
558 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug administrationPopulation: MITT (Modified Intent to Treat) - all subjects that received any amount of study drug
Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary. Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI. Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
n=342 Participants
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=338 Participants
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Clinical Cure
|
291 participants
|
289 participants
|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Clinical Failure
|
25 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Clinical Cure Rate at Test of Cure (TOC) (MITT Population)
Indeterminate
|
26 participants
|
21 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after the last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: last day of study drug administrationOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 21 to 35 days after the last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 21-35 days after last dose of study drugOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: first study drug dose through TOCOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Ceftaroline for Injection
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
n=341 participants at risk
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=339 participants at risk
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinoatrial block
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Condition aggravated
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic shock
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactoid reaction
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteremia
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Central line infection
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dislocation of joint prosthesis
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postprocedural hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia recurrent
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute prerenal failure
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary edema
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.29%
1/341 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.00%
0/339
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
|
0.00%
0/341
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.29%
1/339 • Number of events 1
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftaroline for Injection
n=341 participants at risk
Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours, followed by placebo administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam
n=339 participants at risk
Vancomycin 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours followed by aztreonam 1 g administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
6.5%
22/341 • Number of events 22
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
4.4%
15/339 • Number of events 15
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.2%
21/341 • Number of events 21
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
5.6%
19/339 • Number of events 19
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.3%
18/341 • Number of events 18
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
5.3%
18/339 • Number of events 18
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.8%
13/341 • Number of events 13
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
8.3%
28/339 • Number of events 28
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.5%
12/341 • Number of events 12
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.4%
8/339 • Number of events 8
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.2%
11/341 • Number of events 11
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.9%
10/339 • Number of events 10
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.2%
11/341 • Number of events 11
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.7%
9/339 • Number of events 9
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.9%
10/341 • Number of events 10
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
3.2%
11/339 • Number of events 11
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.3%
8/341 • Number of events 8
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
0.88%
3/339 • Number of events 3
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
2.1%
7/341 • Number of events 7
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
1.2%
4/339 • Number of events 4
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
1.5%
5/341 • Number of events 5
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.7%
9/339 • Number of events 9
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increase
|
1.5%
5/341 • Number of events 5
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.1%
7/339 • Number of events 7
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.5%
5/341 • Number of events 5
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.1%
7/339 • Number of events 7
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
1.2%
4/341 • Number of events 4
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.4%
8/339 • Number of events 8
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.59%
2/341 • Number of events 2
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
2.4%
8/339 • Number of events 8
All safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population which consists of all subjects who received any amount of actual study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place