Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
NCT ID: NCT00422968
Last Updated: 2014-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1454 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent (Cordis Johnson \& Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) compared with bypass surgery for the treatment of an unprotected LMCA stenosis. The alternative hypothesis is that the experimental strategy (coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stents) is not inferior to the standard strategy (bypass surgery).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT05963620
Sealing Moderate Coronary Saphenous VEin Graft Lesions With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
NCT01223443
Evaluation of the Valiant Mona LSA Thoracic Stent Graft System in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Chronic Dissections
NCT03738124
GORE® Embolic Filter in Carotid Stenting for High Risk Surgical Subjects (EMBOLDEN)
NCT00766493
Evaluation of the Valiant Mona LSA Thoracic Stent Graft System in Descending TAA and Chronic Dissections
NCT02365467
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of unprotected LMCA intervention using bare metal stents (BMS). There was a favorable initial outcome after LMCA intervention using BMS in low-risk patients. However, in-stent restenosis after BMS implantation has emerged as the interference to widely perform PCI for unprotected LMCA lesions and the most important reason for selection of bypass surgery as the first choice for treating LMCA stenosis. In-stent restenosis in these patients not only influences long-term survival, but also make repeat intervention more complex. Despite endeavors to decrease in-stent restenosis after LMCA intervention using BMS, such as aggressive debulking atherectomy, the restenosis rate still remains at 20-30%. The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Cypher, Cordis, Johnson \& Johnson Corp, Miami, Florida) markedly decreases in-stent restenosis in elective patients with relatively simple coronary lesions. In real-world practice using SES, patients undergoing SES implantation were treated with a less restrictive interventional approach. However, the results are very promising similar to the randomized controlled trials. These findings warrant new studies to compare the efficacy of SES for more complex lesion subsets including LMCA disease with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
coronary artery bypass graft
coronary artery bypass graft
coronary artery bypass graft
coronary artery bypass graft
percutaneous coronary intervention
Using silorimus eluting stent
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Using silorimus eluting stent
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Using silorimus eluting stent
coronary artery bypass graft
coronary artery bypass graft
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Significant de novo left main stenosis (\>50% by visual estimation) with or without any additional target lesions (\>70% by visual estimation)
* Left main lesion and lesions outside LMCA (if present) potentially equally treatable with coronary stenting and bypass surgery
* Patients with stable (CCS class 1 to 4) or acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina pectoris Braunwald class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC or NSTEMI) or patients with atypical chest pain or without symptoms but having documented myocardial ischemia
* The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Exclusion Criteria
* Heparin
* Aspirin
* Both Clopidogrel and TIclopidine
* Sirolimus, paclitaxel, ABT 578
* Stainless steel and/or
* Contrast media (patients with documented sensitivity to contrast which can be effectively pre-medicated with steroids and diphenhydramine \[e.g. rash\] may be enrolled. Patients with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled).
* Systemic (intravenous) Sirolimus, paclitaxel or ABT-578 use within 12 months.
* Any previous PCI within 1 year
* Previous bypass surgery
* Any previous PCI of a LMCA or ostial left circumflex artery or ostial left anterior descending artery lesion within 1 year
* Intention to treat more than one totally occluded major epicardial vessel
* Acute MI patients within 1 week
* Patients with EF\<30%.
* Patients with cardiogenic shock
* Any disabled stroke with neurological deficit or any cerebrovascular accident within 6 months
* Creatinine level \> 2.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
* Severe hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT \> 3 times upper normal reference values).
* Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
* History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.
* Current known current platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb \<10 g/dL.
* An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 1 year post enrollment.
* Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
* Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
* Subject unable or unwilling to follow-up with visits required by protocol
* Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seung-Jung Park
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Seung-Jung Park
M.D., Ph.D., FACC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu, , South Korea
Chungnam National University Hospital
Daejeon, , South Korea
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, , South Korea
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, , South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
St.Mary's Catholic Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Yonsei University Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon, , South Korea
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gaba P, Sabik JF, Murphy SA, Bellavia A, O'Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park SJ, Park DW, Christiansen EH, Holm NR, Nielsen PH, Sabatine MS, Stone GW, Bergmark BA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation. 2024 Apr 23;149(17):1328-1338. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
Kim TO, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Kim MJ, Lee PH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Lee JM, Jo HH, Park YS, Lim SM, Park SJ, Park DW. Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.068.
Gaba P, Christiansen EH, Nielsen PH, Murphy SA, O'Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park SJ, Park DW, Stone GW, Sabik JF, Sabatine MS, Holm NR, Bergmark BA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
Kim T, Kang DY, Kim S, Lee JH, Kim AR, Lee Y, Oh HJ, Jang M, Lee J, Kim JH, Lee PH, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Park DW; PRECOMBAT Extended Study Investigators. Impact of Complete or Incomplete Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease: The Extended PRECOMBAT Study. JACC Asia. 2023 Jan 24;3(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.007. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Jeong YJ, Ahn JM, Hyun J, Lee J, Kim JH, Yang Y, Choe K, Park H, Kang DY, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ, Park DW. Ten-year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Disease in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: The PRECOMBAT Extended Follow-Up Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019834. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019834. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
Park DW, Ahn JM, Park H, Yun SC, Kang DY, Lee PH, Kim YH, Lim DS, Rha SW, Park GM, Gwon HC, Kim HS, Chae IH, Jang Y, Jeong MH, Tahk SJ, Seung KB, Park SJ; PRECOMBAT Investigators. Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial. Circulation. 2020 May 5;141(18):1437-1446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046039. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Sotomi Y, Onuma Y, Cavalcante R, Ahn JM, Lee CW, van Klaveren D, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Farooq V, Morice MC, Steyerberg EW, Park SJ, Serruys PW. Geographical Difference of the Interaction of Sex With Treatment Strategy in Patients With Multivessel Disease and Left Main Disease: A Meta-Analysis From SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery), PRECOMBAT (Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and BEST (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5):e005027. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005027.
Sotomi Y, Cavalcante R, van Klaveren D, Ahn JM, Lee CW, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, Steyerberg EW, Park SJ, Serruys PW. Individual Long-Term Mortality Prediction Following Either Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery in Patients With Multivessel and/or Unprotected Left Main Disease: An External Validation of the SYNTAX Score II Model in the 1,480 Patients of the BEST and PRECOMBAT Randomized Controlled Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.023.
Ahn JM, Roh JH, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee PH, Chang M, Park HW, Lee SW, Lee CW, Park SW, Choo SJ, Chung C, Lee J, Lim DS, Rha SW, Lee SG, Gwon HC, Kim HS, Chae IH, Jang Y, Jeong MH, Tahk SJ, Seung KB, Park SJ. Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 26;65(20):2198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Song HG, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Park SW, Chung CH, Lee JW, Lim DS, Rha SW, Lee SG, Gwon HC, Kim HS, Chae IH, Jang Y, Jeong MH, Tahk SJ, Seung KB. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1718-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100452. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005-0012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.