Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Test Genetic Alterations Among Different Dermoscopic Types of Melanocytic Nevi. (NCT NCT00422448)
NCT ID: NCT00422448
Last Updated: 2011-01-14
Results Overview
All nevi were analyzed for BRAF mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. A random subset of nevi was also analyzed using the (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS). The frequency is reported here as the number of BRAF mutations found by each method.
COMPLETED
NA
43 participants
up to 30 months
2011-01-14
Participant Flow
Pigmented lesion clinic from October 2006 to March 2009
Insufficient prospective accrual of patients during the 1st year of enrollment lead to additional retrospective inclusion of a dataset of 21 paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from excised nevi .
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Nevi
with or without BRAF and NRAS
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Test Genetic Alterations Among Different Dermoscopic Types of Melanocytic Nevi.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Nevi
n=43 Participants
with or without BRAF and NRAS
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.413 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 30 monthsPopulation: All nevi were analyzed for BRAF mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. A random subset of nevi was also analyzed using the (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS). The frequency is reported here as the number of BRAF mutations found by each method.
All nevi were analyzed for BRAF mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. A random subset of nevi was also analyzed using the (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS). The frequency is reported here as the number of BRAF mutations found by each method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nevi
n=45 nevi
with or without BRAF and NRAS
|
|---|---|
|
Frequency of BRAF Mutations Among Nevi
UDPS (n=24)
|
19 BRAF mutations
|
|
Frequency of BRAF Mutations Among Nevi
Sanger method (n=45)
|
6 BRAF mutations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 monthsPopulation: All nevi were analyzed for NRAS mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. The (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS) is not applicable for this mutation. The frequency is reported here as the number of NRAS mutations from the analyzed nevi.
All nevi were analyzed for NRAS mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. The (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS) is not applicable for this mutation. The frequency is reported here as the number of NRAS mutations from the analyzed nevi.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nevi
n=45 number of nevi
with or without BRAF and NRAS
|
|---|---|
|
Frequency of NRAS Mutations Among Nevi
|
0 NRAS mutations
|
Adverse Events
Nevi
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Prof. Dr. Iris Zalaudek
Medical University of Graz - Austria
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place