Trial Outcomes & Findings for Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder (NCT NCT00419120)
NCT ID: NCT00419120
Last Updated: 2015-11-30
Results Overview
Efficacy of the autologous neo-bladder construct as assessed by a responder analysis (comparing each patient's baseline with 12 month data). Improvement in compliance (i.e. improved bladder pressure/volume relationship) was measured by urodynamics at predetermined bladder pressure points. This was coupled with an assessment of clinical benefit and used to determine responders versus non-responders
TERMINATED
PHASE2
10 participants
12 months
2015-11-30
Participant Flow
11 patients were recruited between Dec 2006 and July 2007. Patients were recruited from 4 academic centers across the US. One patient withdrew from the study prior to implantation of the Neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety analysis, but not in the efficacy analysis (all implanted population).
This was an open label single arm study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Implanted Patients
Patients implanted with Tengion Neo-Bladder Augment
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Study Period
STARTED
|
10
|
|
Primary Study Period
COMPLETED
|
10
|
|
Primary Study Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Long Term Follow up Period
STARTED
|
10
|
|
Long Term Follow up Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Long Term Follow up Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Implanted Patients
Patients implanted with Tengion Neo-Bladder Augment
|
|---|---|
|
Long Term Follow up Period
study ongoing
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Implanted Patients
n=10 Participants
Patients implanted with Tengion Neo-Bladder Augment
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.29 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The analysis population of the primary outcome measure is the all implanted population (Intent to Treat - ITT). There was no imputation of analysis measures.
Efficacy of the autologous neo-bladder construct as assessed by a responder analysis (comparing each patient's baseline with 12 month data). Improvement in compliance (i.e. improved bladder pressure/volume relationship) was measured by urodynamics at predetermined bladder pressure points. This was coupled with an assessment of clinical benefit and used to determine responders versus non-responders
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implanted Patients
n=10 Participants
Patients implanted with Tengion Neo-Bladder Augment
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Responders as Assessed by Compliance
|
6 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: periodically within first 12 months as well as during long term follow up out to 5 yearsclinical evaluation of adverse events, laboratory parameters and urinary imaging to assess any safety issues emerging from this technology and to allow a comparison of a safety profile with standard of care enterocystoplasty. Please refer to the Adverse Event section for detailed information.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implanted Patients
n=10 Participants
Patients implanted with Tengion Neo-Bladder Augment
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Safety Profile - Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event
|
10 participants
|
Adverse Events
Safety Population
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Safety Population
n=11 participants at risk
All patients undergoing screeing and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Malfunction
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 3
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecaloma
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Complication of Device Insertion
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post Procedural Urine Leak
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Safety Population
n=11 participants at risk
All patients undergoing screeing and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
45.5%
5/11 • Number of events 5
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
45.5%
5/11 • Number of events 5
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
45.5%
5/11 • Number of events 5
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Implant Site Inflammation
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
90.9%
10/11 • Number of events 37
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 4
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridial Infection
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear Infection
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterococcal Infection
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Molluscum Contagiosum
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis Media
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis Streptococcal
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Laceration
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal Burn
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Investigations
Hemoglobin Decreased
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
hypokalaemia
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
back pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 4
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal Pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus Ulcer
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1
Adverse events are reported for 11 subjects who were enrolled in the study. One patient withdrew prior to implantation with the neo-bladder construct and is included in the safety population but not in the all implanted population used for efficacy analysis.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator is free to individually communicate, orally present or publish in scientific journals or other scholarly media the study information at the conclusion of the study without the prior approval of the sponsor provided that 1)the results of the study in its entirely have been publically disclosed by or with the consent of the sponsor 2)18 months after the conclusion of the study at all sites whichever is first to occur.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER