Trial Outcomes & Findings for Metazym for the Treatment of Patients With Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) (NCT NCT00418561)

NCT ID: NCT00418561

Last Updated: 2021-06-25

Results Overview

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward, undesired, unplanned clinical event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiological observations occurring in a participant, participating in a clinical study with study drug, regardless of causal relationship. TEAEs were AEs occurred after study drug administration that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state, up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks) completed.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

13 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From study drug administration up to Week 28

Results posted on

2021-06-25

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Overall Study
STARTED
4
5
4
Overall Study
COMPLETED
4
4
4
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cohort 1
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Overall Study
Participant's (guardian's) decision
0
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Metazym for the Treatment of Patients With Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Total
n=13 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
36.25 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32 • n=5 Participants
41.80 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13 • n=7 Participants
30.75 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27 • n=5 Participants
36.69 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.59 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From study drug administration up to Week 28

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward, undesired, unplanned clinical event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiological observations occurring in a participant, participating in a clinical study with study drug, regardless of causal relationship. TEAEs were AEs occurred after study drug administration that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state, up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks) completed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
4 participants
5 participants
4 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT

GMFM was measured using GMFM-88 item scores and summed to calculate a total GMFM-88 score. For each GMFM-88 item, the score was between 0 (minimal) to 3 (maximum). The total GMFM-88 score was between 0 (minimal) and 264 (maximum). The decrease in GMFM score over time indicates worsening of disease over time. Relative change from baseline at Week 26 was calculated as percentage change from baseline divided by the age-difference in months between first and last visit. Adjusted mean and 95 percent (%) confidence intervals were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) at Week 26
-2.36 percent (%) change
Interval -7.62 to 2.91
-8.29 percent (%) change
Interval -13.55 to -3.02
-10.90 percent (%) change
Interval -16.17 to -5.64

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT

Relative change from baseline at Week 26 was calculated as percentage change from baseline divided by the age-difference in months between first and last visit. Adjusted mean and 95 percent (%) confidence intervals were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Sulfatide at Week 26
24.55 percent (%) change
Interval 0.44 to 48.66
-3.77 percent (%) change
Interval -22.33 to 14.8
-4.32 percent (%) change
Interval -28.17 to 19.53

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, the number of participants analyzed are the participants evaluable for this outcome.

Number of participants with shifts between negative (value=0) and positive (value=1) values in urine sulfatide levels from baseline at Week 26 is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=3 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=2 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=2 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Sulfatide Levels in Urine
Negative(0) to negative(0)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Sulfatide Levels in Urine
Negative(0) to positive(1)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Sulfatide Levels in Urine
Positive(1) to negative(0)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Sulfatide Levels in Urine
Positive(1) to positive(1)
3 participants
2 participants
2 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT

Mullen's Scales of Early Learning is used to assess performance and learning ability in young children. The scale consisted of 144 items that had specific scoring criteria for each item. The scores were converted to T-scores with a decrease in score indicating worsening of disease. Relative change from baseline at Week 26 was calculated as percentage change from baseline divided by the age-difference in months between first and last visit. Adjusted mean and 95 percent (%) confidence intervals were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Mullen's Scales of Early Learning at Week 26
16.28 percent (%) change
Interval 0.72 to 31.84
0.26 percent (%) change
Interval -15.49 to 16.02
-4.92 percent (%) change
Interval -20.26 to 10.41

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 20, 40, 90 minutes, 3, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0, 40 minutes post-dose at Week 4, Pre-dose and post-dose at 20, 40, 90 minutes, 3, 6 and 8 hours at Week 8

Population: Due to quick disappearance of rhASA from plasma, rhASA levels were not possible to report.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at 24 hours on Day 0 and at Weeks 8 and 26

Population: Data were not available to report as ASA activity in leukocytes was presented graphically, as per planned analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

An electrophysiological evaluation using standard electrophysiological and electromyography to measure the speed and extent of nerve conduction and units are expressed in meters per second. Abbreviations: MN=Median Nerve; PN=Peroneal Nerve; SN=Sural Nerve; Dig.=Digit; FH=fibular hemimelia; L LM=left lateral medial; R LM=right lateral medial; MC=medial collateral.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
MN, Elbow Wrist: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
20.38 meters per second
Standard Deviation 6.99
25.78 meters per second
Standard Deviation 17.72
15.95 meters per second
Standard Deviation 5.68
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
MN, Elbow Wrist: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
-4.00 meters per second
Standard Deviation 1.10
2.62 meters per second
Standard Deviation 4.42
-3.65 meters per second
Standard Deviation 3.33
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
MN, Dig. II Wrist: Baseline (N=3,5,4)
39.83 meters per second
Standard Deviation 7.22
36.82 meters per second
Standard Deviation 16.64
23.30 meters per second
Standard Deviation 11.99
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
MN, Dig. II Wrist: Change at Week 26 (N=3,4,4)
-11.7 meters per second
Standard Deviation 5.78
-0.25 meters per second
Standard Deviation 4.39
-1.33 meters per second
Standard Deviation 4.72
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
PN, Dig. Ankle FH: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
20.70 meters per second
Standard Deviation 9.08
32.23 meters per second
Standard Deviation 21.41
14.13 meters per second
Standard Deviation 5.92
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
PN, Dig. Ankle FH: Change at Week 26 (N=4,3,4)
-7.85 meters per second
Standard Deviation 3.92
-2.43 meters per second
Standard Deviation 1.59
-2.65 meters per second
Standard Deviation 3.61
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
SN, Sensory L LM - MC: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
26.88 meters per second
Standard Deviation 9.29
36.13 meters per second
Standard Deviation 20.61
29.18 meters per second
Standard Deviation 15.93
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
SN, Sensory L LM - MC: Change at Week 26 (N=3,3,4)
-5.57 meters per second
Standard Deviation 4.18
3.70 meters per second
Standard Deviation 9.79
-9.33 meters per second
Standard Deviation 10.64
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
SN, Sensory R LM - MC: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
31.35 meters per second
Standard Deviation 6.46
34.58 meters per second
Standard Deviation 17.74
27.48 meters per second
Standard Deviation 13.91
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 26
SN, Sensory R LM - MC: Change at Week 26 (N=0,0,0)
NA meters per second
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.
NA meters per second
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.
NA meters per second
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants Who Had Undergone Nerve Biopsy and Had a Normal Nerve at Both Baseline and Week 26
Baseline
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants Who Had Undergone Nerve Biopsy and Had a Normal Nerve at Both Baseline and Week 26
Week 26
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, number of participants analyzed in the Cohort 2 are the participants evaluable for this outcome.

Loes scoring system is used to grade the demyelinating abnormalities on brain MRI. A total of 17 locations of the brain were scored from 0 (normal appearance) to 2 (dense appearance). The total score ranged from 0 to 34 with a score of 14 or greater being considered severe. Number of participants with any shift of score between 0 to 2 for each of the 17 locations (Parieto Occipital \[PO\]-Periventricular \[P\], Central \[C\], Subcortical \[Sc\]; Anterior Temporal \[AT\]-P, C, Sc; Frontal \[F\]-P, C, Sc; Corpus Callosum \[CC\]-Splenium \[S\], Genus \[G\]; Projection Fibers \[PF\]-Capsular interna \[CI\] ant, CI post, Brainstem \[B\]; Cerebellum \[Cb\]-Cortex, Atrophy; Basal Ganglia \[BG\]-BG, Thalamus \[T\]; Cerebral Atrophy \[CA\]-CA), are only reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, C: 2 to 2
3 participants
4 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, Sc: 0 to 0
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, Sc: 0 to 2
0 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, Sc: 1 to 2
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, P: 1 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, P: 2 to 2
3 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, C: 2 to 2
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 0 to 0
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 0 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 0 to 2
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 1 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 1 to 2
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PO, Sc: 2 to 2
3 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, P: 0 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, P: 1 to 2
0 participants
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, P: 2 to 2
3 participants
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, C: 0 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, C: 1 to 2
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, C: 2 to 2
3 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 0 to 0
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 0 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 0 to 2
0 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 1 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 1 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
AT, Sc: 2 to 2
2 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, P: 0 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, P: 1 to 2
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, P: 2 to 2
3 participants
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, C: 1 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
F, Sc: 2 to 2
2 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, S: 1 to 0
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, S: 1 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, S: 2 to 0
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, S: 2 to 1
2 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, S: 2 to 2
0 participants
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, G: 0 to 2
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, G: 1 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, G: 1 to 2
0 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, G: 2 to 1
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CC, G: 2 to 2
2 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI ant: 0 to 0
2 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI ant: 0 to 1
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI ant: 1 to 1
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 0 to 0
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 0 to 1
1 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 1 to 1
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 1 to 2
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 2 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, CI post: 2 to 2
2 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 0 to 0
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 0 to 1
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 0 to 2
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 1 to 0
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 1 to 1
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 1 to 2
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
PF, B: 2 to 2
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Cortex: 0 to 0
2 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Cortex: 0 to 1
0 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Cortex: 1 to 1
2 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Atrophy: 0 to 0
1 participants
1 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Atrophy: 0 to 1
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Cb, Atrophy: 1 to 1
2 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, Bg: 0 to 0
2 participants
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, Bg: 0 to 1
0 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, Bg: 1 to 0
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, Bg: 1 to 1
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, T: 0 to 0
2 participants
3 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, T: 1 to 0
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
Bg, T: 1 to 1
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CA, CA: 0 to 0
1 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CA, CA: 0 to 1
0 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CA, CA: 1 to 1
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Loes Scores
CA, CA: 1 to 2
2 participants
1 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

PEDI is used for the clinical evaluation of functional capabilities, performance and changes in functional skills in children with disabilities. It consisted of 20 items scored on a scale from 0 (total assistance) to 5 (independent). Total score ranged from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better functioning. None, child, rehab, extensive are items in 3 domains (self-care, mobility and social functioning).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, None: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, None: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
-1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
-1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Child: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
3.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Child: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Rehab: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Rehab: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Extensive: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Self-care, Extensive: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, None: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
4.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.89
3.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
5.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, None: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Child: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.67
1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Child: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Rehab: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Rehab: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Extensive: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Mobility, Extensive: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, None: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
4.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
4.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, None: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Child: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Child: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
-1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Rehab: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Rehab: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Extensive: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Change From Baseline in Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Scores at Week 26
Social, Extensive: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, number of participants analyzed in the Cohort 2 are the participants evaluable for this outcome.

Number of participants with at least 1 shift from baseline to Week 26, are reported. Abbreviations: ALT=Alanine transaminase; CK=Creatine kinase; AP=Amyloid P component; LDH=Lactate dehydrogenase.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: Low to low
2 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: Low to normal
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: Normal to low
0 participants
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: Normal to normal
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: High to low
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
ALT-Serum: High to normal
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Amylase-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
AP-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Calcium-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
CK-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
CK-Serum: Normal to high
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
CK-Serum: High to normal
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
CK-Serum: High to high
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Creatinine-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Iron-Serum: Low to normal
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Iron-Serum: Normal to low
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Iron-Serum: Normal to normal
3 participants
3 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Iron-Serum: Normal to high
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
LDH-Serum: Normal to normal
3 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
LDH-Serum: High to normal
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Magnesium-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Phosphate-Serum: Normal to normal
2 participants
3 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Phosphate-Serum: Normal to high
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Phosphate-Serum: High to normal
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Potassium-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Sodium-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
Sodium-Serum: High to normal
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
T Bilirubin-Serum: Normal to normal
4 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Biochemistry
T Bilirubin-Serum: High to normal
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. Data for Cohorts 2 and 3 were not reported since there were no participants with shift from baseline to Week 26 in coagulation evaluations.

Number of participants with at least 1 shift from baseline to Week 26 are reported. The shift reported below for Cohort 1 was from low level at baseline to low level at Week 26.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Coagulation
4 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. The number of participants analyzed in the Cohort 2 are the participants evaluable for this outcome. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

Number of participants with at least 1 shift from baseline to Week 26 are reported. Abbreviations: CSF=Cerebrospinal fluid; NFP=Neurofilament proteins.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin CSF: Normal to normal (N=3,4,4)
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin CSF: Normal to high (N=3,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin CSF: High to high (N=3,4,4)
2 participants
2 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin index: Normal to normal (N=3,4,4)
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin index: High to high (N=3,4,4)
3 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin Serum: Low to low (N=3,4,4)
2 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin Serum: Low to normal (N=3,4,4)
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin Serum: Normal to low (N=3,4,4)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Albumin Serum: Normal to normal (N=3,4,4)
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Chitotriosidase CSF: Low to low (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Chitotriosidase CSF: High to high (N=4,4,4)
3 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
NFP CSF: Normal to high (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
NFP CSF: High to high (N=4,4,4)
3 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Sulfatide CSF: High to high (N=3,4,4)
3 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Tauprotein CSF: High to low (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Genotyping
Tauprotein CSF: High to high (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
3 participants
4 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT. The number of participants analyzed in the Cohort 2 are the participants evaluable for this outcome. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

Number of participants with at least 1 shift from baseline to Week 26 are reported. Abbreviations: Abs=Absolute count; ERCS=Erythrocytes; MCHC=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCH=Mean cell hemoglobin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Basophils Abs - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Eosinophil Abs - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
ERCS - Blood: Low to low (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
ERCS - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
3 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Haemoglobin - Blood: Low to low (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Haemoglobin - Blood: Low to normal (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Haemoglobin - Blood: Normal to low (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Haemoglobin - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
3 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Lymphocyte Abs - Blood: Low to low (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Lymphocyte Abs - Blood: Normal to low (N=4,4,4)
2 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Lymphocyte Abs - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
2 participants
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
MCHC - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
3 participants
3 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
MCHC - Blood: High to normal (N=4,4,4)
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
MCH - Blood: Low to low (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
MCH - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Monocytes Abs - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Monocytes Abs - Blood: High to normal (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Neutropil Abs - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
4 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Neutropil Abs - Blood: Normal to high (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Thrombocytes - Blood: Normal to low (N=4,3,4)
1 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Thrombocytes - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,3,4)
2 participants
0 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
Thrombocytes - Blood: High to normal (N=4,3,4)
1 participants
3 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
T Leucocytes - Blood: Low to normal (N=4,4,4)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
T Leucocytes - Blood: Normal to low (N=4,4,4)
2 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Week 26 in Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Hematology
T Leucocytes - Blood: Normal to normal (N=4,4,4)
2 participants
2 participants
3 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT

The parameters analyzed in urine were albumin/protein, glucose, leucocytes, acetoacetate/ketones, nitrite and pH. Urine analysis findings were considered abnormal as judged by the investigator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings in Urine Analysis
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: ITT

Abnormal ECG findings were considered as clinically significant at the discretion of investigator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Chitotriosidase at Week 26
Baseline (N=4, 5, 4)
924.0 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1431
1481 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1165
367.0 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 179.0
Change From Baseline in Chitotriosidase at Week 26
Change at Week 26 (N=4, 4, 4)
-76.0 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 393.9
-228 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 692.7
94.75 nanomole/hour/milliliter
Standard Deviation 103.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
NFP: Baseline (N=4, 5, 4)
5436 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3698
7848 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4510
12558 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3529
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
NFP: Change at Week 26 (N=4, 4, 4)
1134 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 8098
-3505 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 2553
-4020 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 9061
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
GFAP: Baseline (N=4, 5, 4)
1758 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 397.4
1014 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 524.3
1415 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 625.7
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
GFAP: Change at Week 26 (N=4, 4, 4)
330.0 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 380.3
402.5 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 460.5
502.5 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 285.4
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
Tauprotein: Baseline (N=4, 5, 4)
1148 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 143.4
1014 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 530.9
1610 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 543.4
Change From Baseline in Neurofilament Proteins (NFP), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Tauprotein in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) at Week 26
Tauprotein: Change at Week 26 (N=4, 4, 4)
-288 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 692.3
-273 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 228.7
-118 nanogram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 907.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Population: ITT. Here, "N" signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for the respective category.

Abbreviations: MN=Median Nerve; PN=Peroneal Nerve; SN=Sural Nerve; Dig.=Digit; APB=abductor pollicis brevis; EDB=extensor digitorum brevis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 Participants
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 Participants
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Wrist-APB: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
5.63 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.73
7.88 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.20
4.30 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.05
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Wrist-APB: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.00 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.84
0.65 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.74
-0.35 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.66
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Elbow-APB: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
3.85 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.23
6.34 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.71
2.65 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.60
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Elbow-APB: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
0.15 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.05
0.33 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.57
-0.55 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.65
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Dig. II Wrist: Baseline (N=4,5,4)
2.68 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.30
11.64 millivolts
Standard Deviation 14.89
1.78 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.83
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
MN, Dig. II Wrist: Change at Week 26 (N=4,4,4)
-0.32 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.00
3.53 millivolts
Standard Deviation 6.60
-0.93 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.85
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
PN, Ankle EDB: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
1.85 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.91
5.40 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.55
1.30 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.68
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
PN, Ankle EDB: Change at Week 26 (N=4,3,4)
-0.72 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.66
-0.43 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.56
0.08 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.96
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
PN, FH EDB: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
2.43 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.80
4.98 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.95
0.95 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.74
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
PN, FH EDB: Change at Week 26 (N=4,3,4)
-1.68 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.06
-0.63 millivolts
Standard Deviation 1.46
0.16 millivolts
Standard Deviation 0.75
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
SN, Sensory L LM - MC: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
5.25 millivolts
Standard Deviation 6.31
41.18 millivolts
Standard Deviation 51.50
1.65 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.28
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
SN, Sensory L LM - MC: Change at Week 26 (N=4,3,4)
-2.45 millivolts
Standard Deviation 4.18
0.53 millivolts
Standard Deviation 21.75
-0.78 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.34
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
SN, Sensory R LM - MC: Baseline (N=4,4,4)
5.35 millivolts
Standard Deviation 5.45
50.05 millivolts
Standard Deviation 56.13
1.73 millivolts
Standard Deviation 2.01
Change From Baseline in Amplitude at Week 26
SN, Sensory R LM - MC: Change at Week 26 (N=0,0,0)
NA millivolts
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.
NA millivolts
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.
NA millivolts
Standard Deviation NA
Since there were no participants evaluable for SN, Sensory R LM - MC category at Week 26, data could not be reported.

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 26

Population: Physical examination results were not summarized since data were collected in participant's listing only as planned.

Physical examination included general appearance, skin, head, ears, eyes, nose and throat, lymph nodes, heart, lungs, abdomen, extremities/joints, hip, neurological, mental status and, if appropriate, breasts, external genitalia, pelvic and rectal, and in addition weight, height and head circumference were recorded.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Cohort 1

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 3

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 participants at risk
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 participants at risk
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 participants at risk
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Malnutrition
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis acute
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1
n=4 participants at risk
Single dose of 25 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), thereafter, received repeated doses of 50 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A, once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 2
n=5 participants at risk
Repeated doses of 100 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Cohort 3
n=4 participants at risk
Repeated doses of 200 U/kg recombinant human Arylsulphatase A (Metazym, rhASA), once in every 2 weeks for a period of 26 weeks, as an IV infusion over 60 minutes. Dosage adjustment was done monthly to account for changes in body weight.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis acute
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Herpangina
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Varicella
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Postoperative infection
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
General disorders
Pyrexia
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 6
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 3
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
General disorders
Discomfort
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
General disorders
Infusion related reaction
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Immune system disorders
Type III immune complex mediated reaction
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 12
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
40.0%
2/5 • Number of events 4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 3
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal oedema
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
60.0%
3/5 • Number of events 3
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Investigations
Drug specific antibody present
50.0%
2/4 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Investigations
Blood iron decreased
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Nervous system disorders
Muscle spasticity
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder developmental
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Nervous system disorders
Mutism
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Feeding tube complication
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device occlusion
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Vascular disorders
Flushing
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 2
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Vascular disorders
Pallor
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
Eye disorders
Blindness
0.00%
0/4
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
0.00%
0/5
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1
From study drug administration up to Week 28 until evaluation (when last cohort had 26-week evaluation and data management performed within 4 weeks)

Additional Information

Study Director

Shire

Phone: +1 866 842 5335

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If a multicentre publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicentre Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER