Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT00416208

Last Updated: 2015-03-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

154 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a consolidation therapy with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma aged 61 to 75.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

No data supporting the use of bortezomib as a consolidation therapy in multiple myeloma patients are available. Ínterferon tested as consolidation / maintenance therapy has not uniformly proven to prolong survival. In this study the hypothesis is being tested that bortezomib is able to increase duration of response and thus improving survival. This hypothesis is based on the results of the approval study where bortezomib has been tested to improve these endpoints.This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized (patients are assigned to different treatment group by chance) phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a consolidation therapy with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma aged 61 to 75. Three months after receiving high dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation patients will be randomized to receive either consolidation therapy with bortezomib or to be monitored without consolidation therapy. Subjects in the consolidation group will be treated up to 4 cycles (6 weeks each). The main study phase has a duration of 24 weeks. The trial ends after the last enrolled patient has completed a follow-up period of 30 months. The primary objective is to determine the event free survival in treatment and observation group. The secondary objectives are to assess the response rate, overall survival, duration of response, time to progression, short- and long-term toxicities, quality of life and cytogenetic analyses with regard to treatment response, event free survival and overall survival. Primary efficacy analysis: Event free survival is defined as the time from the first disease-related therapeutic procedure until death, progress or relapse. Secondary efficacy analyses: response rate of the treatment group (measured by the relative change of M-protein levels in serum or urine); overall survival is defined as the time from the first therapeutic procedure until death; time to progression is defined as the duration from the date of enrolment until the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse; duration of response is defined as the duration in months from the date of first evidence of confirmed response to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse; quality of life is assessed by the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of life questionnaire) and EORTC EQ-5D (Euro Quality of life). Consolidation therapy lasts 4 cycles. Subjects will be treated with bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 body surface intravenously once weekly for 4 weeks (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22) followed by a 13-day rest period (days 23 to 35). At least 72 hours should relapse between consecutive doses of bortezomib. Therapy should be withheld at the onset of any Grade 3 nonhematological or Grade 4 hematological toxicities excluding neuropathy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bortezomib

Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 i.v. d1 d8 d15 d22 for 4 cycles each of 35 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

1.6 mg/m2 i.v. d1 d8 d15 d22 for 4 cycles each of 35 days

Observation

Observational arm

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bortezomib

1.6 mg/m2 i.v. d1 d8 d15 d22 for 4 cycles each of 35 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have had pretreatment with single or tandem high dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as first line therapy
* at least stable disease after stem cell transplantation
* adequate hematological, hepatic and renal lab parameters
* karnofsky status of 70 or more

Exclusion Criteria

* non-secretory multiple myeloma
* previous treatment with bortezomib
* allogenic stem cell transplantation
* other co-existing malignancy beside basaliome
* peripheral neuropathy
* epilepsia
* other severe comorbidities (renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, metabolic, infectious etc.)
* history of allergic reactions to bortezomib or mannitol
* expected life expectancy of less than 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

61 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bamberg, , Germany

Site Status

Berg, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Eschweiler, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Goch, , Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Kempten, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kÿln N/A, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mutlangen, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Straka C, Knop S, Vogel M, Muller J, Kropff M, Metzner B, Langer C, Sayer H, Jung W, Durk HA, Salwender H, Wandt H, Bassermann F, Gramatzki M, Rosler W, Wolf HH, Brugger W, Fischer T, Liebisch P, Engelhardt M, Einsele H. Bortezomib consolidation following autologous transplant in younger and older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in two phase III trials. Eur J Haematol. 2019 Sep;103(3):255-267. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13281. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31231828 (View on PubMed)

Einsele H, Knop S, Vogel M, Muller J, Kropff M, Metzner B, Langer C, Sayer H, Jung W, Durk HA, Salwender H, Wandt H, Bassermann F, Gramatzki M, Rosler W, Wolf HH, Brugger W, Engelhardt M, Fischer T, Liebisch P, Straka C. Response-adapted consolidation with bortezomib after ASCT improves progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1463-1466. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.83. Epub 2017 Mar 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28293022 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://filehosting.pharmacm.com/DownloadService.ashx?client=CTR_JNJ_6051&studyid=243&filename=CR006127_CSR.pdf

Consolidation therapy with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma aged 61 to 75

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

26866138MMY3013

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR006127

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Autophagy Induction After Bortezomib for Myeloma
NCT01594242 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1