Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tolvaptan Open-label Pilot Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Study in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) (NCT NCT00413777)
NCT ID: NCT00413777
Last Updated: 2017-07-02
Results Overview
An AE was defined as any new medical problem, or exacerbation of an existing problem, experienced by a participant while enrolled in a study , whether or not it was considered drug-related by the study physician. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that started after start of study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from Baseline and was serious, study drug related, or resulted in death, discontinuation.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
46 participants
AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-Day follow-up
2017-07-02
Participant Flow
A phase 2, multi-center, open-label trial, to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy study of split-dose oral regimens of tolvaptan tablets in a range of 30 to 120 mg/d in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) participants.
This was an open-label study with a 30-day Screening period, Titration period (Day 1 to Month 2), Fixed-dose period (Month 2 to Month 36), and Extension period (12 Months).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fixed-dose Period
STARTED
|
22
|
24
|
|
Fixed-dose Period
COMPLETED
|
18
|
21
|
|
Fixed-dose Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
3
|
|
Extension Period
STARTED
|
17
|
18
|
|
Extension Period
COMPLETED
|
17
|
18
|
|
Extension Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fixed-dose Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Fixed-dose Period
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
|
Fixed-dose Period
Met Withdrawal Criteria
|
1
|
0
|
|
Fixed-dose Period
Withdrew Consent
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Tolvaptan Open-label Pilot Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Study in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Total
n=46 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=5 Participants
|
43.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=7 Participants
|
41.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-Day follow-upPopulation: Safety dataset was defined as all participants who consumed at least 1 dose of study medication. Safety variables analyzed included physical examinations, laboratory tests, vital signs, ECG's and AEs.
An AE was defined as any new medical problem, or exacerbation of an existing problem, experienced by a participant while enrolled in a study , whether or not it was considered drug-related by the study physician. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that started after start of study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from Baseline and was serious, study drug related, or resulted in death, discontinuation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety Assessments Based on Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG's), Clinical Laboratory Tests, Physical Examinations Are Reported as Adverse Events (AEs) Upon Study Physician Discretion.
Participants with serious TEAEs
|
3 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Safety Assessments Based on Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG's), Clinical Laboratory Tests, Physical Examinations Are Reported as Adverse Events (AEs) Upon Study Physician Discretion.
Participants with severe TEAEs
|
6 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Safety Assessments Based on Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG's), Clinical Laboratory Tests, Physical Examinations Are Reported as Adverse Events (AEs) Upon Study Physician Discretion.
Participants discontinued due to AEs
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. Observed cases (OC) dataset were used.
Spot urine osmolality at trough was determined for urine samples collected immediately prior to morning dosing for Day 1 (Baseline), Months 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 for all participants. Sample was taken after the first morning's void and was provided as a mid-stream, clean catch sample. During the titration period (Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4) and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day immediately preceding the 2nd daily dose and at bed-time. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration. At the Month 36 visit, participants were given a urine container and brought back the specimen at Extension Day 1. All participants were fasting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose.
Month 24 (N= 18, 20)
|
-170.17 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 272.21
|
-189.75 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 229.33
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
-222.50 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 229.91
|
-208.90 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 194.19
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose.
Month 2 (N= 21, 22)
|
-274.10 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 223.14
|
-228.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 238.19
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-288.42 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 219.55
|
-263.78 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 221.05
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose.
Month 12 (N= 17, 21)
|
-227.29 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 226.63
|
-178.43 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 228.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Urine osmolality at steady state (after at least 4 days of dosing) including "absolute trough" prior to the second daily dose. Samples for this assessment were taken as closely coincident to PK blood sample as practical. During Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Titration Period and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day immediately preceding the second daily dose. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=20 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose.
Month 2 (N= 21, 21)
|
-263.95 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 220.40
|
-298.71 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 257.53
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-321.78 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 242.53
|
-294.13 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 215.95
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose.
Month 12 (N= 16, 20)
|
-288.20 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 216.85
|
-234.65 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 238.82
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose.
Month 24 (N= 1, 7)
|
-405.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation value was not available or not determined.
|
-227.14 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 334.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Urine osmolality at steady state (after at least 4 days of dosing) including "average of troughs" (the mean urine osmolality prior to bedtime). Samples for this assessment were to be taken as closely coincident to PK blood sample as practical. During Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Titration Period and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day at bedtime. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime.
Month 2 (N= 21, 22)
|
-275.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 219.37
|
-291.09 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 194.88
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-327.41 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 217.15
|
-301.83 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 210.55
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime.
Month 12 (16, 18)
|
-283.21 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 230.81
|
-245.83 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 234.46
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime.
Month 24 (N= 1, 7)
|
-263.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation value was not available or not determined.
|
-246.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 208.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Total Kidney Volume (TKV) was assessed by the central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rater.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume.
Month 2 (N= 21, 24)
|
-1.0 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
-1.3 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume.
Month 12 (N= 18, 22)
|
0.3 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
2.4 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume.
Month 24 (N= 18, 21)
|
4.6 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
1.0 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume.
Month 36 (N= 18, 20)
|
9.9 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
5.3 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
GFR was estimated using reciprocal serum creatinine formula. The formula does not adjust for body weight or height, but this may be done to normalize to body surface area. The formula for reciprocal Serum creatinine is: 1/Pcr. (Pcr = serum creatinine concentration \[mg/dL\]). Clinic weight scales were calibrated at least yearly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 6 (N= 19, 21)
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 9 (N= 18, 23)
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 28 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.07 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 32 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.09 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.07 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
-0.09 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.05 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 12 (N= 17, 22)
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 16 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 20 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
Month 24 (N= 18, 20)
|
-0.04 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 12Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. Observed cases (OC) dataset were used.
Spot urine osmolality at trough was determined for urine samples collected immediately prior to morning dosing for Day 1 (Baseline), Months 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, Extension Day 1, and Extension Month 12 for all participants. Sample was taken after the first morning's void and was provided as a mid-stream, clean catch sample. During the titration period (Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4) and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day immediately preceding the 2nd daily dose and at bed-time. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration. At the Month 36 visit, participants were given a urine container and brought back the specimen at Extension Day 1. All participants were fasting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 17)
|
-328.06 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 207.05
|
-176.88 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 225.54
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-270.94 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 200.29
|
-223.50 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 211.61
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 16, 17)
|
-234.56 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 232.01
|
-155.65 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 242.53
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 17)
|
-54.59 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 236.96
|
-157.18 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 229.19
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-115.59 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 278.19
|
-202.44 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 227.92
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 17)
|
-164.06 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 279.32
|
-160.06 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 196.50
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to First Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
-234.71 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 230.90
|
-196.33 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 175.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Urine osmolality at steady state (after at least 4 days of dosing) including "absolute trough" prior to the second daily dose. Samples for this assessment were taken as closely coincident to PK blood sample as practical. During Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Titration Period and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day immediately preceding the second daily dose. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 17)
|
-281.63 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 235.90
|
-254.82 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 217.14
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-305.25 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 223.90
|
-261.61 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 201.49
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 16, 16)
|
-288.20 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 216.85
|
-190.69 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 201.16
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Second Daily Dose- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 1, 6)
|
-405.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation value was not available or not determined.
|
-120.50 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 196.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Urine osmolality at steady state (after at least 4 days of dosing) including "average of troughs" (the mean urine osmolality prior to bedtime). Samples for this assessment were to be taken as closely coincident to PK blood sample as practical. During Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Titration Period and at Month 6, additional samples were collected for the preceding day at bedtime. These samples allowed derivation of an average nadir of spot urine osmolality concentrations at each dose level and while at steady state during extended tolvaptan administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 17)
|
-322.27 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 207.32
|
-258.88 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 174.51
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-309.73 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 225.40
|
-264.50 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 180.12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime- Extension.
Month 12 (16, 15)
|
-283.21 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 230.81
|
-206.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 200.36
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Urine Osmolality at Steady State Prior to Bedtime- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 1, 6)
|
-263.00 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation value was not available or not determined.
|
-187.50 mOsm/kg
Standard Deviation 153.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 12, 24, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
TKV was assessed by the central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rater.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-1.3 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
-1.4 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.7 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
1.9 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 18)
|
3.2 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
0.2 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
7.9 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
3.8 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
14.1 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
8.4 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Renal Volume-Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
15.7 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
10.7 Percentage change per month
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
GFR was estimated using reciprocal serum creatinine formula. The formula does not adjust for body weight or height, but this may be done to normalize to body surface area. The formula for reciprocal Serum creatinine is: 1/Pcr. (Pcr = serum creatinine concentration \[mg/dL\]). Clinic weight scales were calibrated at least yearly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 17)
|
-0.04 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 28 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 32 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.09 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.05 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.07 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.05 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.04 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.05 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.04 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.09 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.04 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 16)
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.00 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 9 (N= 16, 18)
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 16, 17)
|
-0.03 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.00 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 16 (N= 17, 16)
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.01 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Change From Pre-dose Baseline in Renal Function Estimated by GFR- Extension.
Month 20 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.06 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.02 dL/mg
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
-3.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
-3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-3.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
-5.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 9 (N= 18, 23)
|
-4.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
-3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 12 (N= 18, 23)
|
-8.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
-3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 16 (N= 18, 23)
|
-6.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
-2.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 20 (N= 18, 21)
|
-7.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-10.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 24 (N= 18, 21)
|
-2.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.4
|
-0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 28 (N= 18, 21)
|
-4.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
-4.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 32 (N= 18, 21)
|
-7.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
-7.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (sBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
-5.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
-4.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-3.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
-2.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 9 (N= 18, 23)
|
-4.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.9
|
-2.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 12 (N= 17, 23)
|
-9.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
-1.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 16 (N= 18, 23)
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-2.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 20 (N= 18, 21)
|
-7.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 24 (N= 18, 21)
|
-3.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
-0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 28 (N= 18, 21)
|
-5.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
-2.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 32 (N= 18, 21)
|
-4.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
-3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (dBP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
-5.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-4.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
-3.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
-1.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
-3.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-3.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 9 (N= 18, 23)
|
-4.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
-3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 12 (N= 18, 23)
|
-12.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
-1.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 16 (N= 18, 23)
|
-5.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.0
|
-2.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 20 (N= 18, 21)
|
-7.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.7
|
-7.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 24 (N= 18, 21)
|
-2.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
-0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 28 (N= 18, 21)
|
-5.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
-2.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 32 (N= 18, 21)
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-4.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) for Hypertension Assessment.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
-3.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
-4.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 4, Extension Month 8, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-1.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
-2.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-3.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 9 (N= 16, 18)
|
-4.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
-4.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-8.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
-3.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 16 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
-1.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 20 (N= 17, 18)
|
-7.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
-9.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 18)
|
-1.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
1.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 28 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
-3.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 32 (N= 17, 18)
|
-7.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
-5.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
-5.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 4 (N= 17, 18)
|
-1.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
-8.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 8 (N= 17, 18)
|
1.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
-7.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in sBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
-7.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 4, Extension Month 8, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
0.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
-2.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 9 (N= 16, 18)
|
-5.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.4
|
-2.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 16, 18)
|
-10.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
-1.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 16 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
-2.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 20 (N= 17, 18)
|
-7.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-6.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 18)
|
-3.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 28 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
-2.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 32 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.0
|
-3.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
-4.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
-7.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
-4.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 4 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
-6.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 8 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
-6.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in dBP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.9
|
-5.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 4, Extension Month 8, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participants were seated and resting systolic and diastolic BP for each scheduled assessment was recorded. At each assessment, participants were categorized (based on repeated blood pressure measurements as being normotensive (MAP \< 100 mm Hg and off therapy), high normal (sBP \> 129 and or dBP \> 84 mm Hg off therapy) or hypertensive (sBP \>140 and/or dBP \> 90 mm Hg). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived from these values and were not recorded (MAP = diastolic pressure + \[1/3 x pulse pressure (ie systolic - diastolic pressure)\] in mm Hg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
-3.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 9 (N= 16, 18)
|
-4.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
-3.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-13.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
-2.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 16 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
-1.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 20 (N= 17, 18)
|
-7.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-7.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 18)
|
-3.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 28 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-2.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 32 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
-4.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
-5.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
-4.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 4 (N= 17, 18)
|
-5.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
-6.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 8 (N= 17, 18)
|
-2.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
-6.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in MAP for Hypertension Assessment- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-4.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
-6.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Participants were asked the question to assess the relative level of pain attributed to their kidneys. This question was, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with zero represented no pain at all and 10 represented the worst pain ever experienced, what was the worst kidney pain experienced in the last 4 months?" If the latest assessment was less than 4 months prior, the question was substituted "since your last visit" for "in the last 4 months". The same interrogator designated to this task was used throughout the study for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale.
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale.
Month 6 (N= 19, 23)
|
0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale.
Month 12 (N= 18, 23)
|
1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale.
Month 24 (N= 18, 21)
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Months 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, Extension Day 1, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
Participants were asked the question to assess the relative level of pain attributed to their kidneys. This question was, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with zero represented no pain at all and 10 represented the worst pain ever experienced, what was the worst kidney pain experienced in the last 4 months?" If the latest assessment was less than 4 months prior, the question was substituted "since your last visit" for "in the last 4 months". The same interrogator designated to this task was used throughout the study for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Month 6 (N=17, 18)
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 18)
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-assessed Renal Pain Scale- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 36Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participant had a measurement of their abdominal girth recorded. The measurement will be taken with a tape measure extending around the abdomen at the level of the iliac crests laterally and the umbilicus anteriorly. The examiner should also palpate for each kidney and liver edge, noting presence or enlargement. (By definition if the kidneys are palpable they are enlarged, the liver edge may be palpable but not enlarged).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement.
Month 2 (N= 22, 24)
|
0.6 cm
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
-2.3 cm
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement.
Month 6 (N= 18, 23)
|
1.4 cm
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
0.5 cm
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement.
Month 12 (N= 18, 23)
|
1.3 cm
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
-2.8 cm
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement.
Month 24 (N= 17, 21)
|
2.0 cm
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-0.6 cm
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement.
Month 36 (N= 18, 21)
|
3.1 cm
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
0.3 cm
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Extension Day 1, Extension Month 12Population: The ITT dataset was defined as a dataset that included data from all participants who enrolled to the study with observations at Baseline and Post Baseline. OC dataset were used.
The participant had a measurement of their abdominal girth recorded. The measurement will be taken with a tape measure extending around the abdomen at the level of the iliac crests laterally and the umbilicus anteriorly. The examiner should also palpate for each kidney and liver edge, noting presence or enlargement. (By definition if the kidneys are palpable they are enlarged, the liver edge may be palpable but not enlarged).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Month 36 (N= 17, 18)
|
2.5 cm
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
0.1 cm
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Extension Day 1 (N= 17, 18)
|
4.2 cm
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
2.9 cm
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Extension Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
4.6 cm
Standard Deviation 9.5
|
1.6 cm
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Month 2 (N= 17, 18)
|
-0.8 cm
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
-2.8 cm
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Month 6 (N= 16, 18)
|
0.3 cm
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
0.3 cm
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Month 12 (N= 17, 18)
|
1.1 cm
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
-3.5 cm
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth Measurement- Extension.
Month 24 (N= 17, 21)
|
2.0 cm
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-1.1 cm
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
Adverse Events
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 participants at risk
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 participants at risk
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Polycystic liver disease
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Epiploic appendagitis
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma in situ
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pituitary tumor benign
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal pain
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tolvaptan 45+15 mg
n=22 participants at risk
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 45+15 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
Tolvaptan 60+30 mg
n=24 participants at risk
Participants had received tolvaptan tablets of 60+30 mg orally twice daily during the fixed-dose period from Month 2 to Month 36 followed by a planned extension period for an additional 12 Months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
20.8%
5/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarhhoea
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
16.7%
4/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
18.2%
4/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
20.8%
5/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
20.8%
5/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
25.0%
6/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
25.0%
6/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
18.2%
4/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
27.3%
6/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nocturia
|
22.7%
5/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
12.5%
3/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Polyuria
|
27.3%
6/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal pain
|
40.9%
9/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
37.5%
9/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.5%
1/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
16.7%
4/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
4.2%
1/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
9.1%
2/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
0.00%
0/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
13.6%
3/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/22 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
8.3%
2/24 • AEs were recorded from screening (ICF was signed) until 7-days of safety follow-up. Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. An AE was an exacerbation of an existing problem or any new problem, experienced by a participant when enrolled in a trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician.
|
Additional Information
Global Medical Affairs
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place