Trial Outcomes & Findings for Determining Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine When Given With Measles Vaccine (NCT NCT00412516)
NCT ID: NCT00412516
Last Updated: 2014-10-13
Results Overview
Seropositivity defined as an anti-MV IgG concentration of 120 mIU/mL determined with the Siemens ELISA
COMPLETED
PHASE3
519 participants
24, 36 months post vaccination
2014-10-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
93
|
212
|
214
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
93
|
212
|
214
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Determining Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine When Given With Measles Vaccine
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1
n=93 Participants
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=212 Participants
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
|
Group 3
n=214 Participants
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
Total
n=519 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
20.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION .4 • n=5 Participants
|
20.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION .4 • n=7 Participants
|
20.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION .4 • n=5 Participants
|
20.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION .4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
277 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
242 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Weight (kg)
|
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
|
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=7 Participants
|
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=5 Participants
|
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Height (cm)
|
78.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=5 Participants
|
77.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=7 Participants
|
78.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=5 Participants
|
78.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24, 36 months post vaccinationSeropositivity defined as an anti-MV IgG concentration of 120 mIU/mL determined with the Siemens ELISA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=93 Participants
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=212 Participants
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
n=213 Participants
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Measles Seropositivity at 24 and 36 Months
24 months post vaccination
|
98.92 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 94.15 to 99.97
|
95.75 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 92.09 to 98.04
|
94.37 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 90.37 to 97.06
|
|
Measles Seropositivity at 24 and 36 Months
36 months post vaccination
|
94.62 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 87.9 to 98.23
|
91.39 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 86.73 to 94.82
|
91.04 percentage of participants seropositive
Interval 86.36 to 94.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months post vaccinationSeropositivity defined as an anti-MV IgG concentration of 120 mIU/mL determined with the Siemens ELISA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=89 Participants
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=205 Participants
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
n=211 Participants
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Measles Seropositivity at 12 Months
|
87.64 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 78.96 to 93.67
|
87.32 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 81.97 to 91.55
|
87.2 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 81.93 to 91.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months post vaccination"Seropositive" defined as a person with neutralizing antibody against JE virus at a titer ≥ 1:10 in a 50% plaque-reduction neutralizing assay (PRNT-50)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=93 Participants
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=212 Participants
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
n=214 Participants
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Seropositive Rate for Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Antibody in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
12 months post-JE vaccination
|
90.4 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 81.9 to 95.8
|
83.5 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 77.6 to 88.4
|
86.1 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 80.6 to 90.6
|
|
Seropositive Rate for Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Antibody in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
24 months post-JE vaccination
|
81.1 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 71.5 to 88.6
|
83.8 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 77.8 to 88.6
|
80.7 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 74.6 to 85.9
|
|
Seropositive Rate for Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Antibody in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
36 months post-JE vaccination
|
79.3 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 69.3 to 87.2
|
82.7 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 76.7 to 87.6
|
81.9 percentage of subjects seropositive
Interval 75.8 to 87.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36 months post-JE vaccinationNeutralizing antibody titer determined using a 50% plaque-reduction neutralizing assay (PRNT-50) for JE virus
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1
n=93 Participants
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=212 Participants
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
n=214 Participants
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer to Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Virus in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
12 months post-JE vaccination
|
108 GMT
Interval 70.0 to 167.0
|
83 GMT
Interval 61.0 to 108.0
|
77 GMT
Interval 60.0 to 98.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer to Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Virus in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
24 months post-JE vaccination
|
67 GMT
Interval 46.0 to 99.0
|
64 GMT
Interval 50.0 to 80.0
|
70 GMT
Interval 54.0 to 92.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer to Japanese Encephalitis (JE) Virus in Infants in the Philippines Who Received Measles Vaccine (MV) Before, With, or After SA 14-14-2 JE Vaccination by Month After JE Vaccination.
36 months post-JE vaccination
|
51 GMT
Interval 37.0 to 71.0
|
47 GMT
Interval 38.0 to 58.0
|
58 GMT
Interval 45.0 to 73.0
|
Adverse Events
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1
n=93 participants at risk
SA 14-14-2 followed by measles vaccine one month later
|
Group 2
n=212 participants at risk
Measles and SA 14-14-2 given concurrently
Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine: Live attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine coadministered with live measles vaccine (experimental Group)
|
Group 3
n=214 participants at risk
Measles vaccine followed by SA 14-14-2 one month later
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
1.1%
1/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Amoebiasis
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ascariasis
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
1.4%
3/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
1.4%
3/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cholera
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dengue Fever
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.94%
2/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
1.4%
3/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lobar pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis tuberculous
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
1.4%
3/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.93%
2/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral rash
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fracture
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
General disorders
Developmental delay
|
0.00%
0/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.47%
1/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Food intolerance
|
1.1%
1/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Febrile convulsion
|
1.1%
1/93 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/212 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
0.00%
0/214 • Three years post vaccination
Since no investigational products were administered to subjects during the course of this study, subjects were not actively monitored to detect adverse events (AEs). However, passive surveillance was maintained to note reports of events meeting the definition of a serious AE (SAE).
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Anthony A Marfin, Director Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine Introduction and Sustainability Project
PATH
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee All results communication must be reviewed and approved by the sponsor. The sponsor has 60 days to review results communications and provide comments.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER