Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis (NCT NCT00410410)
NCT ID: NCT00410410
Last Updated: 2015-03-24
Results Overview
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
591 participants
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
2015-03-24
Participant Flow
In this study, a first cohort (Induction Period First Cohort, IP1C) of 490 participants was randomized and used for analysis of the primary endpoint. Following randomization of IP1C, a second cohort (IP2C) of 146 participants was randomized to provide a sufficient number of participants for the Maintenance Period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-Abatacept (ABA) 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, Maintenance Period (MP)
During MP, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day MP-1.
|
Placebo, MP
During the MP, placebo was administered IV every 28 days beginning Day MP-1 through Day MP-337.
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, Open-Label Period (OL)
During OL, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day OL-1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Period (IP)
STARTED
|
141
|
139
|
70
|
140
|
51
|
50
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
COMPLETED
|
106
|
104
|
53
|
120
|
19
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
NOT COMPLETED
|
35
|
35
|
17
|
20
|
32
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
65
|
66
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
11
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
50
|
55
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
349
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
349
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-Abatacept (ABA) 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, Maintenance Period (MP)
During MP, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day MP-1.
|
Placebo, MP
During the MP, placebo was administered IV every 28 days beginning Day MP-1 through Day MP-337.
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, Open-Label Period (OL)
During OL, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day OL-1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Death
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Lack of Efficacy
|
26
|
24
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Subject No Longer Meets Study Criteria
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Administrative Reason By Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
22
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Induction Period (IP)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
25
|
24
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Maintenance Period (MP)
Administrative Reason By Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
25
|
0
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
161
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Pregnancy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Administrative Reason By Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
145
|
|
Open-Label Period (OL)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=51 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
Total
n=591 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<30 years
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 participants
n=10 Participants
|
117 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
30-50 years
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 participants
n=21 Participants
|
32 participants
n=10 Participants
|
324 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>50 years
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 participants
n=21 Participants
|
14 participants
n=10 Participants
|
150 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
248 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
343 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
43 participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 participants
n=21 Participants
|
13 participants
n=10 Participants
|
195 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
3 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
21 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=10 Participants
|
6 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 participants
n=10 Participants
|
9 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 participants
n=10 Participants
|
51 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 participants
n=10 Participants
|
37 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=10 Participants
|
1 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=21 Participants
|
9 participants
n=10 Participants
|
68 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=10 Participants
|
2 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 participants
n=10 Participants
|
40 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
6 participants
n=10 Participants
|
41 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=10 Participants
|
6 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
17 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
34 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 participants
n=10 Participants
|
27 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 participants
n=10 Participants
|
9 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
13 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 participants
n=10 Participants
|
11 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Participants with Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-Tumor (TNF) Therapy (Infliximab)
Inadequate Response/Intolerant to prior Infliximab
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
21 participants
n=10 Participants
|
202 participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Participants with Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-Tumor (TNF) Therapy (Infliximab)
No Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Infliximab
|
96 participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
95 participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 participants
n=21 Participants
|
29 participants
n=10 Participants
|
389 participants
n=115 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least one infusion of study medication (Intent To Treat Population, ITT) were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=140 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=137 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=69 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=139 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)
|
30 participants
|
26 participants
|
14 participants
|
41 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=64 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=64 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12
|
11 participants
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through the end of the OLPopulation: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the safety analyses of the Open-Label Extension phase.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=349 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AEs
|
241 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Related AEs
|
100 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Deaths
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
SAEs
|
66 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Related SAEs
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
SAEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the safety analyses of the Open-Label Extension phase.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=349 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Infections and Infestations
|
127 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Serious Infections
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Opportunistic Infections-Total
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Opportunistic Infections-cytomegalovirus
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Opportunistic Infections-listeriosis
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Total
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Basal Cell Carcinoma
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Bowen's Disease
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-Total
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-episcleritis
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-scleritis
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-anemia hemolytic autoimmune
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-psoriasis
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Acute Infusional AEs
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Peri-infusional AEs
|
25 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=349 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low HGB; n=326
|
20 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low hematocrit; n=322
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low erythrocytes; n=326
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High PLT; n=323
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low leukocytes; n=326
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High leukocytes; n=326
|
18 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low neutrophils + bands; n=324
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High eosinophils; n=324
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High monocytes; n=324
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low lymphocytes; n=324
|
43 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=349 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High ALP, n=331
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High AST, n=331
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High ALT; n=331
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High GGT; n=332
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High bilirubin, n=331
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High BUN; n=310
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High creatinine; n=330
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Low K; n=331
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Ca; n=330
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Low P; n=330
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
High P, n=330
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=349 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Glu; n=245
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High Glu; n=245
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low protein; n=331
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low albumin; n=331
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine protein; n=312
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine Glu; n=312
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine blood; n=312
|
27 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High leukocyte esterase; n=122
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine RBC; n=115
|
22 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine WBC; n=150
|
45 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C
|
8.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=140 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=137 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=69 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=139 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
15 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=140 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=137 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=69 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=139 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
|
24 participants
|
20 participants
|
11 participants
|
36 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=69 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=137 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
|
41 participants
|
14 participants
|
26 participants
|
30 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C
|
120.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.43
|
121.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.42
|
126.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.93
|
124.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.43
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=97 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=99 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=46 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=112 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C
|
9.45 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.514
|
13.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.476
|
9.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.108
|
23.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.268
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 (Week 12)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=104 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=106 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=53 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=118 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Rectal Subscore=0
|
28 participants
|
36 participants
|
16 participants
|
47 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Rectal Subscore=1
|
31 participants
|
30 participants
|
13 participants
|
27 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 (Week 12)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=104 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=106 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=53 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=118 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Stool Frequency Subscore=0
|
13 participants
|
8 participants
|
4 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Stool Frequency Subscore=1
|
14 participants
|
21 participants
|
10 participants
|
32 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 (Week 12)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=104 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=106 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=53 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=118 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
PGA Subscore=0
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
PGA Subscore=1
|
22 participants
|
25 participants
|
15 participants
|
34 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=24 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=46 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=45 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
|
12 participants
|
4 participants
|
7 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=46 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=24 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=45 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
|
8 participants
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=46 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=24 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=45 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 (Day IP-85)Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=46 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=24 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=45 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=51 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
AEs
|
85 participants
|
92 participants
|
39 participants
|
86 participants
|
26 participants
|
27 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
Related AEs
|
48 participants
|
46 participants
|
23 participants
|
37 participants
|
10 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
Deaths
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
SAEs
|
22 participants
|
20 participants
|
8 participants
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
Related SAEs
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
AEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
4 participants
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
SAEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=51 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Serious Infections
|
5 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Infections and Infestations
|
23 participants
|
29 participants
|
8 participants
|
25 participants
|
12 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Opportunistic Infections-Total
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Opportunistic Infections-candidiasis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Opportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Malignancies-Total
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Malignancies-basal cell carcinoma
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Malignancies-malignant melanoma
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-Total
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-uveitis
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-episcleritis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-scleritis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Autoimmune Disorders-psoriasis
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Acute Infusional AEs
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Peri Infusional AEs
|
17 participants
|
20 participants
|
5 participants
|
14 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low HGB; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=133
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
6 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low hematocrit; n=134, n=133, n=67, n=131
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low erythrocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=133
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=133
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=133
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=133
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=133
|
10 participants
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low neutrophils + bands; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=131
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High eosinophils; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=131
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High monocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=131
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low lymphocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=131
|
23 participants
|
13 participants
|
11 participants
|
26 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High ALP, n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High ALT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High GGT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High BUN; n=127, n=130, n=62, n=124
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High creatinine; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low Na; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low Ca; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low P; n=137, 135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=141 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=139 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=70 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
n=140 Participants
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High leukocyte esterase; n=54, n=51, n=27, n=52
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=105
|
1 participants
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=105
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low albumin; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=135
|
7 participants
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High urine protein; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=128
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High urine Glu; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=128
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High urine blood; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=128
|
6 participants
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High urine RBC; n=47, n=42, n=17, n=52
|
9 participants
|
8 participants
|
4 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High urine WBC; n=64, n=56, n=27, n=58
|
14 participants
|
21 participants
|
3 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN;
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=51 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low Na; n=50, n=50
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low K; n=50, n=50
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low P; n=50, n=50
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low Glu; n=37, n=28
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High Glu; n=37, n=28
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low protein; n=50, n=50
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low albumin; n=50, n=50
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine protein; n=50, n=48
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low HGB; n=50, n=49
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low hematocrit; n=50, n=49
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low erythrocytes; n=50, n=49
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High PLT; n=50, n=49
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low leukocytes; n=50, n=49
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High leukocytes; n=50, n=49
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High eosinophils; n=49, n=49
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High monocytes; n=49, n=49
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low lymphocytes; n=49, n=49
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High BUN; n=46, n=44
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High creatinine; n=50, n=50
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine Glu; n=50, n=48
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine blood; n=50, n=48
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=16
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine RBC; n=15, n=20
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine WBC; n=24, n=23
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=51 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=50 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low Glu; n=37, n=28
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High Glu; n=37, n=28
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low protein; n=50, n=50
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low albumin; n=50, n=50
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine protein; n=50, n=48
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine Glu; n=50, n=48
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine blood; n=50, n=48
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=16
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine RBC; n=15, n=20
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High urine WBC; n=24, n=23
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: For participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. "Positive" was defined as "positive post-baseline IP-1" and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed "negative" at baseline.
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=189 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=185 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
n=66 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
Total
|
6 participants
|
19 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
CTLA4/Possibly Ig
|
2 participants
|
17 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
Ig and/or Ig Junction
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=64 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=64 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12
|
8 participants
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=17 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=12 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12
|
11 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants in clinical remission at both Month 6 and Month 12 was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365 (Month 12)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analyses for corticosteroid sparing were not conducted for the MP as planned.
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis for changes from baseline in IBDQ responses were not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis for changes from baseline in SF-36 responses were not conducted for the MP as planned.
The SF-36 is a validated instrument to measure health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. Individual subscale scores and 2 summary scores are calculated: (1) physical component summary (PCS) which includes physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary (MCS) which includes vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, with values ranging from worse health (0) to best health (100).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365 (Month 12)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analyses for corticosteroid sparing were not conducted for the MP as planned.
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365 (Month 12)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with rectal subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365 (Month 12)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with stool frequency subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-365 (Month 12)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with PGA subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical response in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical remission in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12 (Day MP-365)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of mucosal healing in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: For participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. "Positive" was defined as "positive post-baseline IP-1" and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed "negative" at baseline.
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=62 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=47 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Total
|
8 participants
|
20 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
CTLA4/Possibly Ig
|
8 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Ig and/or Ig Junction
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=65 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=66 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AEs
|
39 participants
|
36 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Related AEs
|
12 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Deaths
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
SAEs
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Related SAEs
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
SAEs Leading to Discontinuation
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=65 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=66 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Infections and Infestations
|
39 participants
|
36 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Serious Infections
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Opportunistic Infections-Total
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Opportunistic Infections-pneumonia herpes viral
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-Total
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Malignancies-breast cancer
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-Total
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-erythema nodosum
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Autoimmune Disorders-pemphigoid
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Acute Infusional AEs
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Peri-infusional AEs
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
High=greater than ULN, Low=lower than LLN. LLN/ULN= HGB: \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; PLT: \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; GGT: \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; BUN: \>2 x BL; Na: \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; K: \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; Ca: \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=65 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=66 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low HGB; n=64, n=61
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low hematocrit; n=64, n=60
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low erythrocytes; n=64, n=61
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High PLT; n= 64, n=61
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low leukocytes; n=64, n=60
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High leukocytes; n=64, n=60
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low neutrophils + bands; n=64, n=60
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High eosinophils; n=64, n=60
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High monocytes; n=64, n=60
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low lymphocytes; n=64, n=60
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High lymphocytes; n=64, n=60
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High GGT; n=64, n=62
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High bilirubin, n=64, n=61
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High BUN; n=57, n=59
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Na; n=64, n=62
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low K; n=64, n=62
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Ca; n=64, n=61
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Glu; n=45, n=38
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High Glu; n=45, n=38
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Low protein; n=64, n=61
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine protein; n=58, n=58
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine Glu; n=58, n=58
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine blood; n=58, n=58
|
3 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=18
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine RBC; n=24, n=17
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine WBC; n=29, n=21
|
8 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=65 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=66 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low Glu; n=45, n=38
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High Glu; n=45, n=38
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low protein; n=64, n=61
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine protein; n=58, n=58
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine Glu; n=58, n=58
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine blood; n=58, n=58
|
3 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=18
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine RBC; n=24, n=17
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
High urine WBC; n=29, n=21
|
8 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the efficacy analyses of the OL. Number of Participants Analyzed=all participants in OL; n=number of evaluable participants.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=347 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time
Day OL-365 (n=163)
|
44 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time
Day OL-729 (n=4)
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the efficacy analyses of the OL. Number of Participants Analyzed=all participants in OL; n=number of evaluable participants.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=347 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
Day OL-365 (n=163)
|
18 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
Day OL-729 (n=4)
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Open-Label Period (Day OL-1 through Day OL-729)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of mucosal healing was not conducted for the OL as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=17 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
n=12 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last Study Visit (Day OL-729)Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical efficacy upon retreatment with abatacept among participants who received study drug during the IP or MP was not conducted for the OL as planned.
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Clinical remission = Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: For participants receiving OL medication, all measurements starting after Day OL-1 (including follow-up visits and at 56 and 85 days after last dose)Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. "Positive" was defined as "positive post-baseline IP-1" and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed "negative" at baseline.
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IP1C-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
n=324 Participants
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Total
|
66 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
CTLA4/Possibly Ig
|
59 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Ig and/or Ig Junction
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of corticosteroid use was not conducted for the OL as planned.
Participants taking oral corticosteroids (equivalent of ≤ 30 mg prednisone daily) must have met minimum treatment duration at entry into IP and had stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to entry into the IP.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
ABA 30/~10 mg/kg,IP1C
ABA 30/~10mg/kg,IP2C
ABA 3 mg/kg,IP1C
ABA ~10 mg/kg,IP1C
ABA ~10mg/kg,IP2C
ABA ~10mg/kg, MP
ABA ~10 mg/kg, OL
Placebo, IP1C
Placebo, MP
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ABA 30/~10 mg/kg,IP1C
n=141 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA 30/~10mg/kg,IP2C
n=51 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
ABA 3 mg/kg,IP1C
n=70 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg,IP1C
n=139 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10mg/kg,IP2C
n=50 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10mg/kg, MP
n=65 participants at risk
During MP, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day MP-1.
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, OL
n=349 participants at risk
During OL, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day OL-1.
|
Placebo, IP1C
n=140 participants at risk
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
Placebo, MP
n=66 participants at risk
During the MP, placebo was administered IV every 28 days beginning Day MP-1 through Day MP-337.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
VISION BLURRED
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Investigations
HAEMOGLOBIN DECREASED
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Investigations
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.71%
1/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Cardiac disorders
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Vascular disorders
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Vascular disorders
FEMORAL ARTERIAL STENOSIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
ABNORMAL BEHAVIOUR
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
PERSONALITY CHANGE
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLECYSTITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
HEPATIC FUNCTION ABNORMAL
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Immune system disorders
HYPERSENSITIVITY
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Immune system disorders
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.71%
1/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Nervous system disorders
CEREBRAL ISCHAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
1.4%
2/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
|
1.4%
2/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.57%
2/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
PROCTALGIA
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
|
0.00%
0/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
CROHN'S DISEASE
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS ULCERATIVE
|
9.2%
13/141
|
9.8%
5/51
|
7.1%
5/70
|
10.1%
14/139
|
8.0%
4/50
|
4.6%
3/65
|
12.0%
42/349
|
2.9%
4/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
RECTAL HAEMORRHAGE
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWER
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
|
0.00%
0/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
SEPSIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
VIRAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
VARICELLA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
LISTERIOSIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
ANAL ABSCESS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
OTITIS MEDIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
SEPTIC SHOCK
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
HERPES ZOSTER
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
HIV INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
PILONIDAL CYST
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
LOBAR PNEUMONIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
VIRAL INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
PELVIC INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
ABDOMINAL ABSCESS
|
1.4%
2/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
OTITIS MEDIA CHRONIC
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
CLOSTRIDIAL INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA HERPES VIRAL
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS COLITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE COLITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
NEPHROLITHIASIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.57%
2/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL IMPAIRMENT
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
GLOMERULONEPHRITIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE ACUTE
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.71%
1/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MALNUTRITION
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
|
1.4%
2/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.57%
2/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
IRON DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
UTERINE POLYP
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ALCOHOL POISONING
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FIBROMYALGIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMOTHORAX
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
General disorders
MALAISE
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
General disorders
PYREXIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
General disorders
ASTHENIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
General disorders
INFUSION RELATED REACTION
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
BREAST CANCER
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
BOWEN'S DISEASE
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MALIGNANT MELANOMA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.00%
0/349
|
0.71%
1/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
BASAL CELL CARCINOMA
|
0.71%
1/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.57%
2/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF SKIN
|
0.00%
0/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
0.00%
0/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
0.29%
1/349
|
0.00%
0/140
|
0.00%
0/66
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ABA 30/~10 mg/kg,IP1C
n=141 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA 30/~10mg/kg,IP2C
n=51 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). On Days IP-29 and IP-57, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg.
|
ABA 3 mg/kg,IP1C
n=70 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg,IP1C
n=139 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10mg/kg,IP2C
n=50 participants at risk
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
|
ABA ~10mg/kg, MP
n=65 participants at risk
During MP, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day MP-1.
|
ABA ~10 mg/kg, OL
n=349 participants at risk
During OL, abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \~10 mg/kg (weight-tiered) every 28 days beginning Day OL-1.
|
Placebo, IP1C
n=140 participants at risk
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
|
Placebo, MP
n=66 participants at risk
During the MP, placebo was administered IV every 28 days beginning Day MP-1 through Day MP-337.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
|
12.1%
17/141
|
5.9%
3/51
|
10.0%
7/70
|
8.6%
12/139
|
12.0%
6/50
|
4.6%
3/65
|
6.9%
24/349
|
8.6%
12/140
|
7.6%
5/66
|
|
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
|
2.8%
4/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
5.7%
4/70
|
1.4%
2/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
2.0%
7/349
|
2.1%
3/140
|
4.5%
3/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
5.7%
8/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
4.3%
3/70
|
7.9%
11/139
|
6.0%
3/50
|
3.1%
2/65
|
5.2%
18/349
|
6.4%
9/140
|
6.1%
4/66
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
|
5.7%
8/141
|
3.9%
2/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
0.72%
1/139
|
6.0%
3/50
|
4.6%
3/65
|
4.6%
16/349
|
3.6%
5/140
|
6.1%
4/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
|
0.71%
1/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
2.2%
3/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
6.2%
4/65
|
3.4%
12/349
|
2.1%
3/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
|
3.5%
5/141
|
3.9%
2/51
|
2.9%
2/70
|
2.2%
3/139
|
2.0%
1/50
|
4.6%
3/65
|
8.3%
29/349
|
5.7%
8/140
|
4.5%
3/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
3.5%
5/141
|
3.9%
2/51
|
4.3%
3/70
|
2.9%
4/139
|
6.0%
3/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
3.2%
11/349
|
0.71%
1/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
2.1%
3/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
1.4%
2/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
3.1%
2/65
|
6.3%
22/349
|
3.6%
5/140
|
3.0%
2/66
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
2.1%
3/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
0.00%
0/70
|
1.4%
2/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
6.2%
4/65
|
3.7%
13/349
|
2.1%
3/140
|
7.6%
5/66
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
2.8%
4/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
2.9%
2/70
|
4.3%
6/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
3.1%
2/65
|
5.2%
18/349
|
2.9%
4/140
|
7.6%
5/66
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
|
4.3%
6/141
|
2.0%
1/51
|
2.9%
2/70
|
2.9%
4/139
|
2.0%
1/50
|
6.2%
4/65
|
3.7%
13/349
|
2.1%
3/140
|
7.6%
5/66
|
|
General disorders
FATIGUE
|
4.3%
6/141
|
5.9%
3/51
|
4.3%
3/70
|
5.8%
8/139
|
6.0%
3/50
|
1.5%
1/65
|
4.6%
16/349
|
2.1%
3/140
|
3.0%
2/66
|
|
General disorders
PYREXIA
|
6.4%
9/141
|
5.9%
3/51
|
8.6%
6/70
|
4.3%
6/139
|
2.0%
1/50
|
3.1%
2/65
|
4.9%
17/349
|
1.4%
2/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
|
General disorders
ASTHENIA
|
5.7%
8/141
|
0.00%
0/51
|
1.4%
1/70
|
2.9%
4/139
|
0.00%
0/50
|
0.00%
0/65
|
1.7%
6/349
|
1.4%
2/140
|
1.5%
1/66
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. agreements with investigators vary; constant is our right to embargo communications regarding trial results prior to public release for a period ≤60 days from submittal for review. We will not prohibit investigators from publishing, but will prohibit the disclosure of previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results, and request postponement of single-center publications until after disclosure of the clinical trial's primary publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER