Trial Outcomes & Findings for Argus® II Retinal Stimulation System Feasibility Protocol (NCT NCT00407602)
NCT ID: NCT00407602
Last Updated: 2022-01-20
Results Overview
Grating Visual Acuity is performed at Baseline and at various timepoints throughout the study. As of the 10 year final testing, the total number of subjects that were able to score on the logMAR scale are indicated below. The device has a scale from 1.6 to 2.9 logMAR. Maximum likelihood estimation of visual acuity is based on BEST-PEST algorithm.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
10 years
2022-01-20
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Implant of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis
This is a single group study where the status and performance of the implanted eye prior to surgery serves as the comparator.
Argus II Retinal Stimulation System: epiretinal implantation of device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Implant of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis
This is a single group study where the status and performance of the implanted eye prior to surgery serves as the comparator.
Argus II Retinal Stimulation System: epiretinal implantation of device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death - unrelated to device
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Device explanted
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Implant of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis
n=30 Participants
This is a single group study where the status and performance of the implanted eye prior to surgery serves as the comparator.
Argus II Retinal Stimulation System: epiretinal implantation of device
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
6 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.3 years
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
14 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
10 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
4 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
2 participants
n=30 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 yearsGrating Visual Acuity is performed at Baseline and at various timepoints throughout the study. As of the 10 year final testing, the total number of subjects that were able to score on the logMAR scale are indicated below. The device has a scale from 1.6 to 2.9 logMAR. Maximum likelihood estimation of visual acuity is based on BEST-PEST algorithm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=13 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Visual Acuity
|
2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 yearsEvaluate ocular adverse events reported for all subjects from day of implant through 10 years of study participation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=30 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Total number of subjects with serious ocular AEs
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Total number of subjects with non-serious ocular AEs
|
28 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: Data for all 14 US subjects analyzed
The Massof Activity Inventory measures changes in ability to perform activities of daily living in terms of Goals and Tasks in logits (log-odds units). A logit scale is an equal interval linear scale that represents probability values in terms of real numbers. There is no minimum or maximum scale used in this testing. In this case, a Rasch distribution (using an Andrich rating model) was used to find the maximum likelihood of difficulty of achieving Goals and Tasks, represented in logits. The change in mean logit value between baseline and the 36Month visit for each subject are provided below along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change. A positive change in the Goals or Tasks score which is greater than 0.2 (with a CI less than the mean logit value), is interpreted as a clinically significant increase in functional ability (better outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=14 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S2-Goals
|
1.0 Logit scale
Interval 0.18 to 1.82
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S9-Tasks
|
0.8 Logit scale
Interval -0.09 to 1.69
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S10-Tasks
|
-0.4 Logit scale
Interval -0.71 to -0.09
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S11-Tasks
|
-0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.45 to 0.05
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S12-Tasks
|
-0.3 Logit scale
Interval -0.62 to 0.02
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S13-Tasks
|
0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.11 to 0.51
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
Subject1-Goals
|
-0.1 Logit scale
Interval -0.87 to 0.67
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S3-Goals
|
0.3 Logit scale
Interval -0.33 to 0.93
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S4-Goals
|
0.1 Logit scale
Interval -0.67 to 0.87
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S5-Goals
|
0.1 Logit scale
Interval -0.76 to 0.96
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S6-Goals
|
-0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.4
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S7-Goals
|
-1.6 Logit scale
Interval -2.32 to -0.88
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S8-Goals
|
0.9 Logit scale
Interval 0.21 to 1.59
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S9-Goals
|
0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.25 to 0.65
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S10-Goals
|
-0.3 Logit scale
Interval -0.86 to 0.26
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S11-Goals
|
0.1 Logit scale
Interval -0.51 to 0.71
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S12-Goals
|
0.0 Logit scale
Interval -0.57 to 0.57
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S13-Goals
|
0.5 Logit scale
Interval -0.16 to 1.16
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S14 -Goals
|
NA Logit scale
Error in test administration, data determined to be invalid.
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S1-Tasks
|
0.4 Logit scale
Interval -0.19 to 0.99
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S2-Tasks
|
-0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.45 to 0.05
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S3-Tasks
|
0.4 Logit scale
Interval 0.16 to 0.64
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S4-Tasks
|
-0.1 Logit scale
Interval -0.46 to 0.26
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S5-Tasks
|
0.6 Logit scale
Interval 0.14 to 1.06
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S6-Tasks
|
0.2 Logit scale
Interval -0.06 to 0.46
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S7-Tasks
|
-0.3 Logit scale
Interval -0.81 to 0.21
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S8-Tasks
|
2.0 Logit scale
Interval 1.52 to 2.48
|
|
Massof Activity Inventory
S14-Tasks
|
NA Logit scale
Error in test administration, data determined to be invalid.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: 30 subjects were analyzed comparing Baseline visit to the last visit when VisQOL was performed.
Quality of life is being measured using the VisQOL survey. This instrument, developed by researchers at the University of Melbourne, Australia, is a vision and quality of life-related utility measure intended to evaluate healthcare interventions for the visually impaired. The utility score is a preference-based measure of vision-related quality of life (Dimension 7 score (Health Dimension Score (1=Best, 0=Worst)). It measures subjective quality of life on a scale of 0 to 1, where 0 represents worst possible quality of life and 1 represents perfect quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=30 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life - Tasks for Daily Living
|
.6191 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .2146
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 yearsPopulation: Data for all 14 US subjects analyzed
Argus II System for orientation and mobility, each subject completed two tests (walking to a high-contrast "door" on the wall and following a straight line on the floor) at various timepoints throughout the study. Accuracy (percent of trials where the subject successfully reached the target) was measured with the device system ON and system OFF. Average % success rates across the analysis population are provided for each modality and for each test at the 60 month time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=14 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Orientation and Mobility
Average % system ON-Door Task
|
58 percentage of successful trials
Standard Deviation 24
|
|
Orientation and Mobility
Average % system OFF-Line Task
|
10 percentage of successful trials
Standard Deviation 13
|
|
Orientation and Mobility
Average % system OFF-Door Task
|
18 percentage of successful trials
Standard Deviation 19
|
|
Orientation and Mobility
Average % system ON-Line Task
|
68 percentage of successful trials
Standard Deviation 36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 yearsPopulation: Data available only on 13 of the 14 US subjects
Square localization (SL) and Direction of Motion (DOM) testing performed at specific protocol intervals. SL tests ability of subjects to locate high-contrast square on black screen. DOM tests ability of subjects to determine the direction a white bar is moving over a black screen. Each test is performed with the system ON and then compared to performance with the system OFF. Number of subjects who performed significantly better with the system ON is indicated below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=13 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Visual Function
SL - Number of subjects with significantly better with system ON
|
9 Participants
|
|
Visual Function
DOM - Number of subjects with significantly better with system ON
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 yearsPopulation: Data for all 14 US subjects analyzed
Stability of electrode array on the retina. Qualitative review of imaging: retinal and array landmarks compared from all time points post implant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=14 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Stability of Implant - 5 Years Post Implant
Stable position of array on Array position stable-no rotation
|
8 Participants
|
|
Stability of Implant - 5 Years Post Implant
Minor array rotation
|
5 Participants
|
|
Stability of Implant - 5 Years Post Implant
Inconclusive data
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 yearsNumber of participants with functional devices 10 years post implant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=30 Participants
Only one arm in this study, treatment arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Device Reliability
|
28 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Single Arm
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=30 participants at risk
Single arm with fellow eye as comparator
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival dehiscence
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival erosion
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 9 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal melt
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Endophthalmitis - infective
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Epiretinal membrane
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Hypotony
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Iris rubeosis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis - infective
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Migration (extra-ocular) of intraocular silicone oil
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Re-tack
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment - rhegmatogenous
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment - tractional and serous
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal tear
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Single Arm
n=30 participants at risk
Single arm with fellow eye as comparator
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
360 Circumferential Vitreous Band Traction
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Choroidal detachment
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 6 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Choroidal effusion
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival congestion
|
33.3%
10/30 • Number of events 11 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival cyst
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival dehiscence
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival erosion
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis - inflammatory
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal abrasion
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal dryness
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal epithelial defect
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal fold
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal opacity
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal Suture Broken
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal vascularization
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Decrease in light perception
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Elective revision surgery
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 7 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Epiphora
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Epiretinal membrane
|
36.7%
11/30 • Number of events 11 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Fibrosis around retinal tack
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Filamentary keratitis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign Body Sensation
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Headache
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
High IOP
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Hyphema
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Hypotony
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 8 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Inflammation - ocular
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Irregular pupil
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratic Precipitates
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 3 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
General disorders
Nausea
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Nystagmus increase
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular fibrin
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Pain - ocular
|
30.0%
9/30 • Number of events 18 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Pre-retinal hemorrhage
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ptosis
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Break/Tear
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment - tractional
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal folds
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Thickening - cystoid macular edema (CME)
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Thickening - without cystic changes
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinoschisis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Revision Surgery - tack replacement
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Rubeosis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Scleral graft displacement or reabsorption
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Scleritis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
General disorders
Suture irritation
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 7 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 6 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
General disorders
Vertigo
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous hemorrhage
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • 10 years
Ocular events are reportable for this protocol from day of implant through the last study visit for each subject.
|
Additional Information
Jessy Dorn, PhD, Director of Clinical and Scientific Affiars
Second Sight Medical Products, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place