Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Benefits of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT00401622)

NCT ID: NCT00401622

Last Updated: 2019-05-15

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

320 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From baseline to 52 wks

Results posted on

2019-05-15

Participant Flow

Recruitment was conducted at 18 study sites at various locations in the UK (6 Sites), US (10 Sites) and Canada (2 Sites). The first subject was enrolled on 10th October 2006 and the last Subject completed the study on 28th December 2008. Participating sites included family practice centres (US and UK) and hospital based clinical sites in the US.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
Overall Study
STARTED
160
160
Overall Study
COMPLETED
126
117
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34
43

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Benefits of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=160 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
n=160 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
Total
n=320 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
202 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97 • n=5 Participants
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54 • n=7 Participants
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
109 participants
n=5 Participants
103 participants
n=7 Participants
212 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
12 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
21 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
39 participants
n=5 Participants
48 participants
n=7 Participants
87 participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline A1C
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 • n=5 Participants
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49 • n=7 Participants
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49 • n=5 Participants
Fasting glucose
141.1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.40 • n=5 Participants
144.8 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.19 • n=7 Participants
143.0 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.41 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 52 wks

Population: The study was designed to give 84% power to detect a 0.5% difference in the change of A1C between both groups

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=125 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
n=116 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
Change in A1C From Baseline to Week 52 Between the OneTouch® Ultra®2 and Control BGMS.
-0.35 Percentage
Standard Error 0.073 • Interval -0.38 to 0.04
-0.18 Percentage
Standard Error 0.076 • Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 52 wks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=115 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
n=101 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
Change in Daily Glycemic Excursions Between the OneTouch® Ultra®2 and Control BGMS.
102.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 49.03 • Interval -7.24 to 22.36
105.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 38.17 • Interval 0.0 to 0.0

Adverse Events

OneTouch® Ultra®2 System

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard Care

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=160 participants at risk
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
n=160 participants at risk
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
Vascular disorders
BLOCKED ARTERIES ACROSS GROIN
0.00%
0/160
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Mike Grady

LifeScan Scotland

Phone: (44) 01463 721889

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60