Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Benefits of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT00401622)
NCT ID: NCT00401622
Last Updated: 2019-05-15
Results Overview
COMPLETED
NA
320 participants
From baseline to 52 wks
2019-05-15
Participant Flow
Recruitment was conducted at 18 study sites at various locations in the UK (6 Sites), US (10 Sites) and Canada (2 Sites). The first subject was enrolled on 10th October 2006 and the last Subject completed the study on 28th December 2008. Participating sites included family practice centres (US and UK) and hospital based clinical sites in the US.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
|
Standard Care
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
160
|
160
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
126
|
117
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
34
|
43
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Benefits of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=160 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
|
Standard Care
n=160 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
|
Total
n=320 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
202 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97 • n=5 Participants
|
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54 • n=7 Participants
|
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
109 participants
n=5 Participants
|
103 participants
n=7 Participants
|
212 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Baseline A1C
|
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 • n=5 Participants
|
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49 • n=7 Participants
|
7.6 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting glucose
|
141.1 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.40 • n=5 Participants
|
144.8 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.19 • n=7 Participants
|
143.0 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.41 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 wksPopulation: The study was designed to give 84% power to detect a 0.5% difference in the change of A1C between both groups
Outcome measures
| Measure |
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=125 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
|
Standard Care
n=116 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in A1C From Baseline to Week 52 Between the OneTouch® Ultra®2 and Control BGMS.
|
-0.35 Percentage
Standard Error 0.073 • Interval -0.38 to 0.04
|
-0.18 Percentage
Standard Error 0.076 • Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 wksOutcome measures
| Measure |
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=115 Participants
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
|
Standard Care
n=101 Participants
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Daily Glycemic Excursions Between the OneTouch® Ultra®2 and Control BGMS.
|
102.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 49.03 • Interval -7.24 to 22.36
|
105.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 38.17 • Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
Adverse Events
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
Standard Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
n=160 participants at risk
Test care group assigned to OneTouch® Ultra®2 System
|
Standard Care
n=160 participants at risk
Control group receiving standard care with a traditional blood glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
BLOCKED ARTERIES ACROSS GROIN
|
0.00%
0/160
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60