Effectiveness of Dalteparin Therapy as Intervention in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
NCT ID: NCT00400387
Last Updated: 2014-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
449 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Dalteparin for Long-term (One Year) Treatment of Blood Clots in Subjects With Cancer
NCT00942968
Dalteparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin In Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT00435487
Study on Antithrombotic Prevention in Thrombophilia and Pregnancy Loss
NCT02385461
A Study of Dalteparin Prophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Cancer Patients
NCT00876915
Treatment of Upper Extremity Deep-Vein Thrombosis
NCT00245856
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several aetiologies have been identified or are under discussion to play a role in RPL, including chromosomal translocations and inversions, anatomic alterations of the uterus, endocrinological abnormalities, autoimmune disorders infection, smoking and alcohol consumption, exposure to environmental factors as well as coagulation and immunoregulatory defects (Pandey 2005, Lee 2000). About 30-40% of cases of RPL remain unexplained after standard gynaecological, hormonal and karyotype analysis (Rey 2000).
As stated by Pandey et al (Pandey 2005), a successful implantation during pregnancy requires a balanced equilibrium between coagulation, fibrinolysis and vascular remodeling by the process of angiogenesis in order to avoid excess fibrin accumulation in placental vessels and intervillous spaces (Buchholz 2003). However, thrombosis in decidual vessels is reported to be one of the major causes of RPL (Arias 1998) and could be explained by excessive thrombosis of the placental vessels, placental infarction, and secondary uteroplacental insufficiency.
Recurrent pregnancy loss is a well-described complication of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and is thought to be associated with thrombosis of placental vessels, often with evidence for placental infarction. More recently, inherited thrombophilic abnormalities have been linked to RPL and other obstetric complications. At least 16 case-control studies found a high prevalence of factor V Leiden (FVL) in women with unexplained RPL (up to 30%) compared to 1% to 10% of control subjects with odds ratios ranging from 2 to 5 (Press et al. 2002). Likewise, other thrombophilic risk factors including factor II G20210A, hyperhomocysteinemia, protein C, protein S and antithrombin deficiencies have also been associated with RPL (Sanson 1996; Brenner 1999).
A meta-analysis of Rey et al. (Rey 2003) including 31 case control, cohort and cross-sectional studies, showed an association between thrombophilia and fetal loss, though the magnitude varies according to type of fetal loss and type of thrombophilia.
Although most pregnancy losses occur in the first trimester, women with thrombophilia are at an increased risk for pregnancy loss in the second and third trimesters. A number of studies found that FVL carriers have a significantly higher risk of late pregnancy loss than early first trimester loss (Sarig 2002; Meinardi 1999). One possible explanation is that late pregnancy losses may reflect thrombosis of placental vessels. However, the majority of pregnancy losses in women with thrombophilia still occur in the first trimester (Sarig 2002; Younis 2000). The mechanisms responsible for the association of inherited thrombophilia with RPL have not been fully elucidated. Pathological studies of placentas obtained from gestations terminated by foetal loss reveal thrombotic changes and infarcts. These can be observed at the maternal vessels in 50-90% of placentae of women with stillbirth (Gris 1999; Many 2001). However, these changes can also be found in a significant proportion of women with RPL without thrombophilia (Gris 1999; Martinelli 2000). Raising the possibility of yet undetermined gestational prothrombotic risk factors either at fetal vessels or at maternal vessels. A role for foetoplacental thrombosis has been suggested by studies demonstrating an association between factor V genotype in miscarried foetuses and placental infarction. However, the findings of thrombotic changes at the maternal side and the efficacy of LMWH, which do not cross the placentae, in preventing foetal loss are in support with the latter. Emerging data on therapy of women with inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy loss is mostly uncontrolled and include small series of patients treated mainly with LMWH. The potential advantages of LMWH over unfractionated heparin are higher antithrombotic ratio, meaning less bleeding for better antithrombotic effect, longer half-life with a potential need for only one injection per day, smaller injected volume and less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. These advantages are particularly appealing for prolonged prophylaxis throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. A recent collaborative study has demonstrated the safety of using LMWH during 486 gestations (Sanson 1999). Successful outcome was reported in 83/93 (89%) gestations in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and in all 28 gestations in women with preeclampsia in previous pregnancy.
Since novel inherited and acquired prothrombotic abnormalities are currently under investigation, clinicians often address the question of prophylaxis in women with RPL who do not have a specific thrombophilic defect. The encouraging results presented above let rise the clinical practise of LMWH therapy without the proved evidence in women without thrombophilic disorders. To give the basis for a rational therapy this question should be answered by this prospective randomized trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multivitamin supplement
Multivitamin supplement
general pregnancy support by multivitamin supplementation and close monitoring
Multivitamin supplement + dalteparin sodium
Fragmin P Forte (dalteparin sodium)
subcutaneous injection, once daily supported by multivitamine supplement and close monitoring
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fragmin P Forte (dalteparin sodium)
subcutaneous injection, once daily supported by multivitamine supplement and close monitoring
Multivitamin supplement
general pregnancy support by multivitamin supplementation and close monitoring
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented foetal heart activity in US
* History of recurrent pregnancy loss, defined as:
* 2 or more early (\< 12 weeks of gestation) pregnancy losses or
* 1 or more late (\> 12 weeks of gestation) pregnancy loss
* at least 18 years of age
* Written informed consent of the patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Uterine anomalies
* Maternal infection which caused previous pregnancy loss
* Risk group II or III according to ETHIG I risk stratification (clinical need for heparin prophylaxis)
* Acute thromboembolic event (need of heparin therapy)
* Known hypersensitivity to any of the trial drugs or its ingredients (i.e. thrombocytopenia type II caused by allergic reaction to heparin)
* Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
* Diabetes mellitus
* Ongoing nicotine or drug or alcohol abuse
* Known HIV infection
* Expected low compliance (e.g. by travel distance to trial site)
* Current or recent (within 30 days prior to start of trial treatment) treatment with another investigational drug or participation in another investigational trial
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Jena
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ekkehard Schleussner
Sponsor-Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ekkehard Schleussner, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Jena, Hospital for gynaecology and obstetrics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kinderwunschinstitut Schenk
Dobl, , Austria
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Universitätsfrauenklinik am Universitätsklinikum "Carl Gustav Carus" der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, , Germany
Krankenhaus St. Elisabeth und St. Barbara, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Halle, , Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Abt. für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Hanover, , Germany
Frauenklinik Landshut Achdorf
Landshut, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, , Germany
Klinikum der Universität München Großhadern, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
München, , Germany
Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isa
München, , Germany
Praxis für medizinische Genetik
Regensburg, , Germany
Klinikum Stuttgart, Frauenklinik
Stuttgart, , Germany
Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
Tübingen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;3(3):CD001689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001689.pub4.
Rogenhofer N, Markoff A, Wagner A, Klein HG, Petroff D, Schleussner E; EThIG II Group; Thaler CJ. Lessons From the EThIGII Trial: Proper Putative Benefit Assessment of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Treatment in M2/ANXA5 Haplotype Carriers. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Jan;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/1076029616658117. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Schleussner E, Kamin G, Seliger G, Rogenhofer N, Ebner S, Toth B, Schenk M, Henes M, Bohlmann MK, Fischer T, Brosteanu O, Bauersachs R, Petroff D; ETHIG II group. Low-molecular-weight heparin for women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a multicenter trial with a minimization randomization scheme. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 5;162(9):601-9. doi: 10.7326/M14-2062.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EudraCT 2006-001984-53
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.