Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of Two Postoperative Techniques Used to Predict Voiding Efficiency After Gynecologic Surgery (NCT NCT00392210)
NCT ID: NCT00392210
Last Updated: 2017-04-27
Results Overview
Voiding trial 1 was performed according to the patient assignment to group 1 or 2. Voiding trial 2 was done immediately after completion of trial 1. A successful trial was defined as a void of greater than two-thirds of total bladder volume (voided volume + post-void residual urine).
COMPLETED
NA
79 participants
postoperatively after surgery on day1 or 2
2017-04-27
Participant Flow
271 potential subjects were identified. 192 declined participation so 79 were enrolled.
10 subjects were withdrawn prior to randomization
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Auto-fill Followed by Back Fill
The Auto fill-method was performed immediately followed by the back-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
Back Fill Followed by Autofill
The back fill-method was performed immediately followed by the auto-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Voiding Trial
STARTED
|
36
|
33
|
|
First Voiding Trial
COMPLETED
|
34
|
31
|
|
First Voiding Trial
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
|
Second Voiding Trial
STARTED
|
34
|
31
|
|
Second Voiding Trial
COMPLETED
|
34
|
31
|
|
Second Voiding Trial
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Auto-fill Followed by Back Fill
The Auto fill-method was performed immediately followed by the back-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
Back Fill Followed by Autofill
The back fill-method was performed immediately followed by the auto-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Voiding Trial
Physician Decision
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Assessment of Two Postoperative Techniques Used to Predict Voiding Efficiency After Gynecologic Surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Auto Fill Followed by Back Fill
n=41 Participants
The Auto fill-method was performed immediately followed by the back-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
Back Fill Followed by Auto Fill
n=38 Participants
The back fill-method was performed immediately followed by the auto-fill method. Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void. Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
Total
n=79 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.05 • n=5 Participants
|
57.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04 • n=7 Participants
|
59.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
41 participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: postoperatively after surgery on day1 or 2Voiding trial 1 was performed according to the patient assignment to group 1 or 2. Voiding trial 2 was done immediately after completion of trial 1. A successful trial was defined as a void of greater than two-thirds of total bladder volume (voided volume + post-void residual urine).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Auto Fill Intervention
n=65 Participants
Auto fill: The catheter was removed and the bladder was allowed to fill spontaneously until the patient experienced a strong urge to void.
|
Back Fill Intervention
n=65 Participants
Back Fill: The bladder was filled retrograde through the indwelling Foley catheter with 300 cc sterile saline or until the patient reported a strong urge whichever occurred first.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Passed Bladder Trial
|
25 participants
|
39 participants
|
Adverse Events
Auto Fill
Back Fill
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Michael K. Flynn, MD
University of Rochester
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place