A Phase II Trial of Calcitriol and Naproxen in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00383487

Last Updated: 2013-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine whether, in this patient population, treatment with calcitriol and Naproxen is more effective in delaying the growth of prostate cancer than treatment with calcitriol alone as seen in historical controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In summary, in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as early phase clinical trial, have shown a promising role for both calcitriol and NSAIDs in the treatment of prostate cancer. Moreover, calcitriol and NSAIDs both exert their antiproliferative effect by decreasing prostaglandin levels, but they do so by different mechanisms. Thus, there is reason to believe that their combined effects on prostaglandins may be synergistic. Preliminary in vitro assays in which calcitriol is given in combination with one of two different NSAIDs (Naprosyn or sulindac) to LNCaP cell lines have indicated such synergy. This observation provides the rational for using them in combination for the treatment of prostate cancer. In addition, it is hoped that any synergy noted would allow for the use of lower doses of NSAIDs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostatic Neoplasms Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Calcitriol

0.5 micrograms/kilogram q weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

Naproxen-n-butyl nitrate

400 mg BID, oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 Naprosyn

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must give written informed consent
* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Biochemical relapse after primary radiation therapy or surgery
* Normal testosterone levels
* 3 rising PSA after nadir, with interval between PSA determinations \> 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* Local recurrence by CT scan
* Distant metastases by bone scan
* Hypercalcemia
* Nephrolithiasis
* Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 1.8 mg/dl)
* Pancreatitis
* History of ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding
* More than 6 months of hormone ablation therapy
* Concurrent therapy for prostate cancer
* Uncontrolled HTN
* H/O MI, CVA, TIA
* Known coronary disease/cerebrovascular disease
* Platelet counts \<50
* Patients on anticoagulants
* Patients on lithium
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novacea

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sandy Srinivas

Associate Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Sandy Srinivas

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

95804

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PROS0021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.