Trial Outcomes & Findings for Zalutumumab in Patients With Non-curable Head and Neck Cancer (NCT NCT00382031)

NCT ID: NCT00382031

Last Updated: 2013-10-15

Results Overview

A patient's overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months. Overall survival was censored if the patient was lost to follow-up or refused to continue in the trial.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

286 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From randomization until death

Results posted on

2013-10-15

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Zalutumumab
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care. Patients received weekly infusions of zalutumumab. After a loading dose of 8 mg/kg the dose was reduced to 4 mg/kg and individual dose titration based on skin rash evaluation was performed.
Control
Best Supportive Care
Overall Study
STARTED
191
95
Overall Study
COMPLETED
191
95
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Zalutumumab in Patients With Non-curable Head and Neck Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
Total
n=286 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
161 Participants
n=93 Participants
77 Participants
n=4 Participants
238 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants
n=93 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
48 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age Continuous
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=93 Participants
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=4 Participants
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
34 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
169 Participants
n=93 Participants
83 Participants
n=4 Participants
252 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
5 participants
n=93 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
6 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
3 participants
n=93 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
4 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 participants
n=93 Participants
4 participants
n=4 Participants
5 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
2 participants
n=93 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
2 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
42 participants
n=93 Participants
22 participants
n=4 Participants
64 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
22 participants
n=93 Participants
10 participants
n=4 Participants
32 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
13 participants
n=93 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
16 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
37 participants
n=93 Participants
20 participants
n=4 Participants
57 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 participants
n=93 Participants
8 participants
n=4 Participants
18 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
7 participants
n=93 Participants
4 participants
n=4 Participants
11 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
31 participants
n=93 Participants
20 participants
n=4 Participants
51 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
14 participants
n=93 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
16 participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
4 participants
n=93 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
4 participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization until death

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.

A patient's overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months. Overall survival was censored if the patient was lost to follow-up or refused to continue in the trial.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
Overall Survival
6.7 months
Interval 5.8 to 7.1
5.2 months
Interval 4.1 to 6.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months.

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.

Objective tumor response assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v 1.0) J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-16 assessed by CT/MRI. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR), CR+PR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
Objective Tumor Response
Complete response
2 participants
0 participants
Objective Tumor Response
Partial response
10 participants
1 participants
Objective Tumor Response
Stable disease
79 participants
25 participants
Objective Tumor Response
Progressive disease
70 participants
38 participants
Objective Tumor Response
Not evaluable
30 participants
31 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Time from complete or partial response until death, recurrence or progressive disease, assessed up to 41 months.

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.

Duration of response defined as the time from the first date where measurement criteria for complete or partial response (whichever status is recorded first) are met until the first date that death, recurrence or progressive disease is objectively documented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=12 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=1 Participants
Best Supportive Care
Duration of Response
5.5 month
Interval 3.6 to 23.0
7.4 month
CI not available as it was only one patient

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression or death, assessed up to 41 months.

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.

PFS (defined as the time from randomization until disease progression or death). The progression events were defined by well-documented and verifiable imaging data. In case of censoring, the date of censoring had to be the last time point documenting the status of the patient.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
9.9 weeks
Interval 8.7 to 15.0
8.4 weeks
Interval 8.1 to 9.6

Adverse Events

Zalutumumab

Serious events: 180 serious events
Other events: 188 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 87 serious events
Other events: 92 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=189 participants at risk
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=94 participants at risk
Best Supportive Care
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
67.2%
127/189 • Number of events 138 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
67.0%
63/94 • Number of events 64 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
General disorders
Disease progression
62.4%
118/189 • Number of events 118 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
63.8%
60/94 • Number of events 60 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
20.1%
38/189 • Number of events 48 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
23.4%
22/94 • Number of events 27 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour hemorrhage
16.9%
32/189 • Number of events 41 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
14.9%
14/94 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Infections and infestations
Infections and Infestations
18.5%
35/189 • Number of events 46 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
11.7%
11/94 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
7.4%
14/189 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders
10.1%
19/189 • Number of events 20 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
5.3%
10/189 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Zalutumumab
n=189 participants at risk
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
Control
n=94 participants at risk
Best Supportive Care
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
84.1%
159/189 • Number of events 359 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
83.0%
78/94 • Number of events 161 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
92.1%
174/189 • Number of events 355 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
10.6%
10/94 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders
54.0%
102/189 • Number of events 298 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
45.7%
43/94 • Number of events 119 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
42.3%
80/189 • Number of events 177 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
35.1%
33/94 • Number of events 51 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Infections and infestations
Infections and Infestations
41.8%
79/189 • Number of events 171 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
30.9%
29/94 • Number of events 35 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
40.7%
77/189 • Number of events 150 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
21.3%
20/94 • Number of events 27 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
34.9%
66/189 • Number of events 121 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
27.7%
26/94 • Number of events 44 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders
37.0%
70/189 • Number of events 114 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
23.4%
22/94 • Number of events 38 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
26.5%
50/189 • Number of events 75 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
31.9%
30/94 • Number of events 39 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
24.3%
46/189 • Number of events 78 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
28.7%
27/94 • Number of events 41 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Investigations
Investigations
29.6%
56/189 • Number of events 77 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
12.8%
12/94 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Vascular disorders
Vascular disorders
14.8%
28/189 • Number of events 38 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
7.4%
7/94 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
Eye disorders
Eye disorders
12.7%
24/189 • Number of events 37 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
5.3%
5/94 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.

Additional Information

Eva Järlid Westerberg, VP Clinical Operations

Genmab A/S

Phone: +45 7020 2728

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The site and the PI may be required to withhold the publication for up to 90 days. Subject to a reasoned request from the sponsor, the publication may be further delayed for a period up to 6 months from the date of first submission to the sponsor. The sponsor has the right to require deletion of any trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information supplied by the sponsor to the site or the PI. The sponsor shall not otherwise have the right to censor publications.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER