Trial Outcomes & Findings for Zalutumumab in Patients With Non-curable Head and Neck Cancer (NCT NCT00382031)
NCT ID: NCT00382031
Last Updated: 2013-10-15
Results Overview
A patient's overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months. Overall survival was censored if the patient was lost to follow-up or refused to continue in the trial.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
286 participants
From randomization until death
2013-10-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care. Patients received weekly infusions of zalutumumab. After a loading dose of 8 mg/kg the dose was reduced to 4 mg/kg and individual dose titration based on skin rash evaluation was performed.
|
Control
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
191
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
191
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Zalutumumab in Patients With Non-curable Head and Neck Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
|
Total
n=286 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
161 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
238 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
30 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=93 Participants
|
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=4 Participants
|
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
169 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
252 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
|
5 participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
1 participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
|
42 participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 participants
n=4 Participants
|
64 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
22 participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
32 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
13 participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
37 participants
n=93 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
57 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 participants
n=4 Participants
|
18 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
7 participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
31 participants
n=93 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
51 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
14 participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
4 participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization until deathPopulation: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.
A patient's overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months. Overall survival was censored if the patient was lost to follow-up or refused to continue in the trial.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
6.7 months
Interval 5.8 to 7.1
|
5.2 months
Interval 4.1 to 6.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 41 months.Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.
Objective tumor response assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v 1.0) J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-16 assessed by CT/MRI. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR), CR+PR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Tumor Response
Complete response
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Objective Tumor Response
Partial response
|
10 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Objective Tumor Response
Stable disease
|
79 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Objective Tumor Response
Progressive disease
|
70 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Objective Tumor Response
Not evaluable
|
30 participants
|
31 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from complete or partial response until death, recurrence or progressive disease, assessed up to 41 months.Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.
Duration of response defined as the time from the first date where measurement criteria for complete or partial response (whichever status is recorded first) are met until the first date that death, recurrence or progressive disease is objectively documented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=12 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=1 Participants
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response
|
5.5 month
Interval 3.6 to 23.0
|
7.4 month
CI not available as it was only one patient
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression or death, assessed up to 41 months.Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was based on the intent-to-treat principle and thus comprised all randomized patients. The FAS was used for evaluation of all efficacy endpoints and was the primary analysis population.
PFS (defined as the time from randomization until disease progression or death). The progression events were defined by well-documented and verifiable imaging data. In case of censoring, the date of censoring had to be the last time point documenting the status of the patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=191 Participants
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=95 Participants
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
|
9.9 weeks
Interval 8.7 to 15.0
|
8.4 weeks
Interval 8.1 to 9.6
|
Adverse Events
Zalutumumab
Control
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=189 participants at risk
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=94 participants at risk
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
|
67.2%
127/189 • Number of events 138 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
67.0%
63/94 • Number of events 64 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
62.4%
118/189 • Number of events 118 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
63.8%
60/94 • Number of events 60 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
|
20.1%
38/189 • Number of events 48 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
23.4%
22/94 • Number of events 27 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour hemorrhage
|
16.9%
32/189 • Number of events 41 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
14.9%
14/94 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections and Infestations
|
18.5%
35/189 • Number of events 46 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
11.7%
11/94 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
7.4%
14/189 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders
|
10.1%
19/189 • Number of events 20 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
5.3%
10/189 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Zalutumumab
n=189 participants at risk
Zalutumumab in combination with Best Supportive Care
|
Control
n=94 participants at risk
Best Supportive Care
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
|
84.1%
159/189 • Number of events 359 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
83.0%
78/94 • Number of events 161 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
|
92.1%
174/189 • Number of events 355 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
10.6%
10/94 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders
|
54.0%
102/189 • Number of events 298 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
45.7%
43/94 • Number of events 119 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
|
42.3%
80/189 • Number of events 177 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
35.1%
33/94 • Number of events 51 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections and Infestations
|
41.8%
79/189 • Number of events 171 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
30.9%
29/94 • Number of events 35 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
|
40.7%
77/189 • Number of events 150 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
21.3%
20/94 • Number of events 27 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
|
34.9%
66/189 • Number of events 121 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
27.7%
26/94 • Number of events 44 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders
|
37.0%
70/189 • Number of events 114 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
23.4%
22/94 • Number of events 38 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
|
26.5%
50/189 • Number of events 75 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
31.9%
30/94 • Number of events 39 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
|
24.3%
46/189 • Number of events 78 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
28.7%
27/94 • Number of events 41 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Investigations
Investigations
|
29.6%
56/189 • Number of events 77 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
12.8%
12/94 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular disorders
|
14.8%
28/189 • Number of events 38 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
7.4%
7/94 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye disorders
|
12.7%
24/189 • Number of events 37 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
5.3%
5/94 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected during weekly visits for patients treated with zalutumumab and visits every fourth week for patients randomized to the control group.
The safety analysis population included all 283 patients who had attended Visit 2.
|
Additional Information
Eva Järlid Westerberg, VP Clinical Operations
Genmab A/S
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The site and the PI may be required to withhold the publication for up to 90 days. Subject to a reasoned request from the sponsor, the publication may be further delayed for a period up to 6 months from the date of first submission to the sponsor. The sponsor has the right to require deletion of any trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information supplied by the sponsor to the site or the PI. The sponsor shall not otherwise have the right to censor publications.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER