Study of Unprotected Left Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery (LE MANS Study)

NCT ID: NCT00375063

Last Updated: 2006-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-01-31

Study Completion Date

2005-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenting, offering restoration of a native flow to left coronary artery, is the subject of intense investigations as a potential alternative to bypass surgery. The purpose of the study is to compare the short and long term results of unprotected left main stenting with coronary artery bypass surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The natural history and the results of pharmacological treatment in patients with severe narrowing of left main coronary artery show very poor prognosis (5 year survival less than 50%).

There is general agreement that surgical treatment improves 5 year survival in patients with left main coronary artery obstruction 3, however long term survival rate (15 year follow-up) is low in both groups (37% and 27% respectively in surgical and medical group). Median survival was longer in surgical group in general population (13.3 vs 6.6 years) , but there was no significant difference in patients with normal LV ejection fraction (14.7 vs 15 years).

With the advent of coronary stenting encouraging results were reported by several authors. There was high success rate 98-100% for elective procedures and in these series the mortality (for protected and non-protected left main) ranged from 0 to 3.4 %, and 6 month event free survival rate was 70-80%. Restenosis rate in stented LM varied from 10-22% for proximal LM to 40% for distal LM. Final minimal luminal area \>=7mm2 post procedure, assessed by IVUS, predicted low restenosis rate of 7%, while the area below \<7mm2 was connected with restenosis of 50%. Our and other experience showed that left main in-stent restenosis can be treated successfully with another percutaneous intervention (including endarterectomy and balloon angioplasty) as well as by surgical revascularization.

Six and 12-month survival rate depended on the LV function. Patients with LVEF\>40% had in-hospital event free survival of 98% and 9-month event free survival of 86%, whereas patients with LVEF \<40% had in-hospital and 9 month event-free survival of 67 and 22% respectively. Additionally, in patients presented with acute myocardial infarction or bail-out procedures, early and late results of LM stenting were not as good as for elective cases.

Our previously presented promising results of left main stenting is mainly related to proper technique of LM stenting (short inflations within LM, careful guiding catheter manipulation, stent selection), as well as very cautiously designed follow-up (every month visit for first six month, routine coronary angiography within 3-6 months after procedure). This initial experience gives us the backgrounds for a larger prospective randomized trial comparing elective surgical revascularisation and percutaneous intervention in patients with LM coronary artery disease. It is our impression that design and the delivery system of the new generation stent is uniquely suited to safely treat this difficult subset of patients. At the present time we would limit the study to the discrete lesions in proximal (ostial and mid) left main with reference luminal diameter \>=3 mm. Based on published results of stenting under IVUS examination for such a lesion we estimate the restenosis rate to be well below 10%. As we expect, the survival and complication rate within one year in both group will be similar. Therefore our main concern is weather both treatment strategies will offer the same prevention of LV function, as well as improvement of functional capacity and coronary reserve in both groups in a period of 2-3 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Stenosis Myocardial Revascularization Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

left main stenosis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patients' age 18 to 80
* Significant LM stenosis (\>50%)
* The target vessel reference diameter 2.5mm.
* Concomitant multivessel disease suitable for PCI is allowed.
* The patient is an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass surgery.
* The patient agreement for 6 month follow-up cardiac catheterization, which will include left ventricular angiogram.
* The patient written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* An allergy or contraindication to aspirin, ticlopidine or Clopidogrel.
* Presence of diffuse, significant (\>++) calcifications in LM
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
* History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
* Any previous PCI or CABG surgery
* Acute MI within 48 hours, cardiogenic shock.
* Bail-out stenting of dissected LM during complicated PCI.
* The patient suffered a stroke or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within 3 months.
* Chronic renal insufficiency.
* Positive pregnancy test.
* Any disease that may shorten the life expectancy of the patient.
* The patient is currently participating in another research study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pawel E Buszman, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Silesian Medical School, Poland

Stefan R Kiesz, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

2San Antonio Endovascular and Heart Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Tx, USA,

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sharpe-Strumia Research Foundation of the Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

San Antonio Endovascular and Heart Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Jagiellonian University

Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Silesian Medical School 1-st Department of Cardiosurgery

Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Silesian Medical School 3-rd Department of Cardiology, Coronary Care Unit

Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chieffo A, Colombo A. Treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease with drug-eluting stents: is it time for a randomized trial? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):396-400. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0272.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16119701 (View on PubMed)

Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Montorfano M, Airoldi F, Michev I, Sangiorgi MG, Carlino M, Vitrella G, Colombo A. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation. 2005 Feb 15;111(6):791-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155256.88940.F8. Epub 2005 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15699254 (View on PubMed)

Park SJ, Kim YH, Lee BK, Lee SW, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Mintz GS, Park SW. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;45(3):351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15680711 (View on PubMed)

Valgimigli M, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, Aoki J, Granillo GA, McFadden EP, Kappetein AP, de Feyter PJ, Smits PC, Regar E, Van der Giessen WJ, Sianos G, de Jaegere P, Van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Short- and long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH). Circulation. 2005 Mar 22;111(11):1383-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158486.20865.8B.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15781749 (View on PubMed)

Peszek-Przybyla E, Buszman P, Bialkowska B, Zurakowski L, Banasiewicz-Szkrobka I, Debinski M, Tendera M. Stent implantation for the unprotected left main coronary artery. The long-term outcome of 62 patients. Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jan;64(1):1-6; discussion 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16444619 (View on PubMed)

Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A, Peszek-Przybyla E, Szkrobka I, Debinski M, Bialkowska B, Dudek D, Gruszka A, Zurakowski A, Milewski K, Wilczynski M, Rzeszutko L, Buszman P, Szymszal J, Martin JL, Tendera M. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18237682 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6 P05B 132 21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id