Intracervical Block Versus Placebo to Assess Pain Control During Hysterosalpingogram

NCT ID: NCT00372658

Last Updated: 2006-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-31

Study Completion Date

2004-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 1% lidocaine intracervical block to placebo for pain control during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram (HSG). We hypothesized that an intracervical block would decrease pain during a hysterosalpingogram.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The hysterosalpingogram (HSG) is an integral part of the evaluation for anatomic etiologies of female infertility. The majority of women regard a hysterosalpingogram as acutely painful since it involves placement of a cervical tenaculum, traction on the cervix, and instillation of dye through a cervical cannula. Different techniques have been employed to attempt to make the procedure less painful, including use of balloon catheters rather than cannulas; however, this has not been shown to be uniformly effective. Previous studies have shown a reduction in overall pain during HSG after pre-medication with oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Benzocaine gel (20%) applied to the cervix has also been shown to reduce pain. Conversely, a study of pre-medication with paracetamol (acetaminophen) showed no statistical improvement in pain perception. Additionally, transcervical intrauterine instillation of lidocaine has been shown in randomized studies to not improve pain scores and may actually increase pain after the procedure is complete A MEDLINE literature search of papers written in English from January 1966 to August 2005, using the keywords "hysterosalpingogram," "analgesia", "paracervical," and "intracervical" did not reveal any prior studies on the use of an intracervical block prior to hysterosalpingography. A paracervical block has been shown to decrease pain with therapeutic abortions, endometrial biopsy, and office hysteroscopy (7, 8). We hypothesized that an intracervical block would also decrease pain during a hysterosalpingogram. A three armed, randomized controlled trial comparing pain control after a 1% lidocaine intracervical block, saline injection or no injection in patients undergoing hysterosalpingogram was performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

hysterosalpingogram intracervical local anesthesia pain perception visual analogue scale

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1% Lidocaine intracervical injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients without a known cause for their infertility who were undergoing a hysterosalpingogram were eligible for enrollment.
* All subjects were 18 to 40 years of age and married.

Exclusion Criteria

* Included a history of any allergies to local anesthetics, radio-opaque dye or to anti-inflammatory medications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

59th Medical Wing

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Randal D Robinson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wilford Hall Medical Center and Brooke Army Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wiford Hall Medical Center

Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Robinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247645.52211.41.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17197592 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FWH20010125H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id