Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Guidelines for Preterm Infants

NCT ID: NCT00369005

Last Updated: 2006-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1992-12-31

Study Completion Date

1999-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether restrictive guidelines for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions for preterm infants can reduce the number of transfusions without adverse consequences.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design, Setting, and Patients. We enrolled 100 hospitalized preterm infants with birth weights 500 to 1300 g into a randomized clinical trial comparing two levels of hematocrit threshold for RBC transfusion.

Intervention. The infants were randomly assigned to either the liberal or the restrictive transfusion group. For each group, transfusions were given only when the hematocrit fell below the assigned value. In each group, the transfusion thresholds decreased with improving clinical status.

Main Outcome Measures. We recorded the number of transfusions, the number of donor exposures, and various clinical and physiological outcomes.

Results. Infants in the liberally transfused group received more RBC transfusions, mean 5.2 (SD 4.5) vs 3.3 (SD 2.9) in the restrictive transfusion group (P=0.025). However, the number of donors to whom the infants were exposed was not significantly different, mean 2.8 (SD 2.5) vs 2.2 (SD 2.0). There was no difference between the groups in the percentage of infants who avoided transfusions altogether, 12% in the liberal transfusion group vs 10% in the restrictive group. Infants in the restrictive group were more likely to have intraparenchymal brain hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia (P=0.012), and they had more frequent episodes of apnea (P=0.004), including both mild and severe episodes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infant, Premature Anemia Intracranial Hemorrhages Leukomalacia, Periventricular Apnea

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Transfusions Erythrocyte Anemia Brain Infant, Premature

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Red blood cell transfusion guidelines

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preterm infant
* Birth weight 500-1300 grams

Exclusion Criteria

* Alloimmune hemolytic disease
* Congenital heart disease
* Other major birth defect requiring surgery
* Chromosomal abnormality
* Thought to be facing imminent death
* Parental philosophical or religious objections to transfusion
* More than 2 transfusions before enrollment
* Participation in other research study with potential impact on this study
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

2 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward F. Bell, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bell EF, Strauss RG, Widness JA, Mahoney LT, Mock DM, Seward VJ, Cress GA, Johnson KJ, Kromer IJ, Zimmerman MB. Randomized trial of liberal versus restrictive guidelines for red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1685-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1884.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15930233 (View on PubMed)

Nopoulos PC, Conrad AL, Bell EF, Strauss RG, Widness JA, Magnotta VA, Zimmerman MB, Georgieff MK, Lindgren SD, Richman LC. Long-term outcome of brain structure in premature infants: effects of liberal vs restricted red blood cell transfusions. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 May;165(5):443-50. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.269. Epub 2011 Jan 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21199970 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P01HL046925

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

M01RR000059

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IowaBell001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id