Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-11-30
2008-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine
Participants received 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine for 4 weeks.
atomoxetine
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Twice a day matching placebo
Participants received twice a day matching placebo for 4 weeks.
Matching Placebo
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive twice a day matching placebo at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
atomoxetine
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive 40 milligram twice a day atomoxetine at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Matching Placebo
This study utilizes a crossover design. Accordingly, half of the participants receive twice a day matching placebo at arm one while the remaining half receive this intervention at arm two.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 to 65
* Must have mild HD
* Must have complaints of poor attention
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, dementia, delirium or severe anxiety
* Current use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) medication
* Pregnancy
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Tachycardia
* Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease
* History of a loss of consciousness for greater than (or equal to) 5 minutes
* Having any neurological disorder or insult other than Huntington disease
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eli Lilly and Company
INDUSTRY
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Beglinger, Leigh J
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leigh J Beglinger, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):971-83. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e.
Campodonico JR, Aylward E, Codori AM, Young C, Krafft L, Magdalinski M, Ranen N, Slavney PR, Brandt J. When does Huntington's disease begin? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Sep;4(5):467-73. doi: 10.1017/s1355617798455061.
Lawrence AD, Hodges JR, Rosser AE, Kershaw A, ffrench-Constant C, Rubinsztein DC, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ. Evidence for specific cognitive deficits in preclinical Huntington's disease. Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1329-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.7.1329.
Paulsen JS, Zhao H, Stout JC, Brinkman RR, Guttman M, Ross CA, Como P, Manning C, Hayden MR, Shoulson I; Huntington Study Group. Clinical markers of early disease in persons near onset of Huntington's disease. Neurology. 2001 Aug 28;57(4):658-62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.4.658.
Marder K, Zhao H, Myers RH, Cudkowicz M, Kayson E, Kieburtz K, Orme C, Paulsen J, Penney JB Jr, Siemers E, Shoulson I. Rate of functional decline in Huntington's disease. Huntington Study Group. Neurology. 2000 Jan 25;54(2):452-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.2.452.
Gomez-Tortosa E, MacDonald ME, Friend JC, Taylor SA, Weiler LJ, Cupples LA, Srinidhi J, Gusella JF, Bird ED, Vonsattel JP, Myers RH. Quantitative neuropathological changes in presymptomatic Huntington's disease. Ann Neurol. 2001 Jan;49(1):29-34.
Beglinger, L. et al. The association between speed of processing and cerebral white matter volume in patients with mild Huntington's disease [abstract]. Poster session accepted at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, April, 2004
Halliday GM, McRitchie DA, Macdonald V, Double KL, Trent RJ, McCusker E. Regional specificity of brain atrophy in Huntington's disease. Exp Neurol. 1998 Dec;154(2):663-72. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6919.
Nopoulos, P. et al., (under review). Structural Brain Abnormalities in pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease.
Aylward EH, Anderson NB, Bylsma FW, Wagster MV, Barta PE, Sherr M, Feeney J, Davis A, Rosenblatt A, Pearlson GD, Ross CA. Frontal lobe volume in patients with Huntington's disease. Neurology. 1998 Jan;50(1):252-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.252.
Casey BJ, Castellanos FX, Giedd JN, Marsh WL, Hamburger SD, Schubert AB, Vauss YC, Vaituzis AC, Dickstein DP, Sarfatti SE, Rapoport JL. Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;36(3):374-83. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00016.
Hale TS, Hariri AR, McCracken JT. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: perspectives from neuroimaging. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(3):214-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:33.0.CO;2-M.
Heilman KM, Voeller KK, Nadeau SE. A possible pathophysiologic substrate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl:S76-81. doi: 10.1177/0883073891006001s09.
Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, Prince J, Hatch M, Jones J, Harding M, Faraone SV, Seidman L. Effectiveness and tolerability of tomoxetine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 May;155(5):693-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.5.693.
Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, Reimherr FW, West SA, Allen AJ, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Dietrich A, Milton D. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan 15;53(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01671-2.
Conners, CK et al. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). 1999. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of Iowa Huntington's Disease Center of Excellence
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
200508775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id