Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adapting Tools to Implement Stroke Risk Management to Veterans (NCT NCT00355147)
NCT ID: NCT00355147
Last Updated: 2018-10-11
Results Overview
* Stroke Specifc, Health Related Quality of Life (SSQoL) * Self reported survey by LS Williams Weinberger M, Clark, D, Harris L, Biller J. Development of a stroke specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 1999;30:1362-1369. * Contains 12 domains and 49 items Scored on a 5 pt Likert response format with lower score indicating worse function/lower ability on that item or domain. Domain scores were calculated as an unweighted average of item scores in that domain. Overall Total Score was calculated as an unweighted average of domain scores. We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater stroke specific quality of life than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05.
COMPLETED
NA
174 participants
6 months for (SSQoL) and 3 months for Perceived Energy Subdomain
2018-10-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Prevention Intervention
Randomized to receive the intervention which included receipt of stroke prevention and self management intervention and stroke peer support.
|
Arm 2 Control Group
Received usual care, follow up telephone calls to control for contact, and educational materials
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
87
|
87
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
69
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
18
|
20
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Prevention Intervention
Randomized to receive the intervention which included receipt of stroke prevention and self management intervention and stroke peer support.
|
Arm 2 Control Group
Received usual care, follow up telephone calls to control for contact, and educational materials
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
8
|
12
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adapting Tools to Implement Stroke Risk Management to Veterans
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=87 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/Transcient Ischemic Attack
|
Attention Control Group
n=87 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
Total
n=174 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)9 Depressive Symptoms
|
7.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16 • n=5 Participants
|
6.82 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68 • n=7 Participants
|
7.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.34 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Stroke Specific Health Related Quality of Life Perceived Energy
|
2.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.24 • n=5 Participants
|
3.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=7 Participants
|
3.04 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=7 Participants
|
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Stroke Specific, Health-Related Quality of Life
|
3.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68 • n=5 Participants
|
3.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.72 • n=7 Participants
|
3.84 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.72 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Self-Efficacy to Manage Stroke
|
7.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68 • n=5 Participants
|
8.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.60 • n=7 Participants
|
8.14 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.60 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Self-Efficacy to Communicate with Physician
|
2.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 • n=5 Participants
|
2.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.28 • n=7 Participants
|
2.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months for (SSQoL) and 3 months for Perceived Energy SubdomainPopulation: We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater stroke specific quality of life than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05. Number of participants were set per protocol and we used intention to treat in our protocol and analyses. We adjusted the analyses for group, TIA/Stroke, site, and time.
* Stroke Specifc, Health Related Quality of Life (SSQoL) * Self reported survey by LS Williams Weinberger M, Clark, D, Harris L, Biller J. Development of a stroke specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 1999;30:1362-1369. * Contains 12 domains and 49 items Scored on a 5 pt Likert response format with lower score indicating worse function/lower ability on that item or domain. Domain scores were calculated as an unweighted average of item scores in that domain. Overall Total Score was calculated as an unweighted average of domain scores. We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater stroke specific quality of life than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=71 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/TIA
|
Attention Control Group
n=68 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroke Specific Health Related Quality of Life
Overall Total Score
|
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
3.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Stroke Specific Health Related Quality of Life
Perceived Energy Score
|
2.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
3.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater self-efficacy to manage stroke symptoms than the control group. Level of significance was set to .05. Number of participants were set per protocol and we used intention to treat in our protocol and analyses. We adjusted the analyses for group, TIA/Stroke, site, \& time.
Confidence to manage symptoms and health post stroke on a 1-10 scale where 10 denotes a lot of confidence and a 1 denotes no confidence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=60 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/TIA
|
Attention Control Group
n=63 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy to Manage Stroke Symptoms
|
7.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
8.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater medication compliance than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05. The number of participants were set per protocol and we used intention to treat in our protocol and analyses.
* Medication Possession Ratios 6 months post stroke events based upon Pharmacy Refill data * Medication Possession Ratios are the % of days in follow up period of 6 months with possession of oral Diabetes drugs (range = 0 -100%) * Compliance is defined as Medication Possession Ratio for Diabetes drugs dichotomized as greater than and equal to 80%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=32 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/TIA
|
Attention Control Group
n=14 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Medication (Diabetes) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Managment
>=80% Compliance at baseline
|
13 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Medication (Diabetes) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Managment
<80% Compliance at baseline
|
19 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Medication (Diabetes) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Managment
>=80% Compliance at 6 months
|
21 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Medication (Diabetes) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Managment
<80% Compliance at 6 months
|
11 participants
|
8 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater medication compliance than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05. The number of participants were set per protocol and we used intention to treat in our protocol and analyses.
* Medication Possession Ratios 6 months post stroke event based upon Pharmacy Refill data * Medication Possession Ratios are the % of days in follow up period of 6 months with possession of Statin drugs (range= 0-100%). * Compliance is defined as Medication Possession Ratio for Statin drugs dichotomized as greater than and equal to 80%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=72 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/TIA
|
Attention Control Group
n=71 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Medication (Statins) for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
>=80% Compliance at baseline
|
16 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Medication (Statins) for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
<80% Compliance at baseline
|
56 participants
|
53 participants
|
|
Medication (Statins) for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
>=80% Compliance at 6 months
|
44 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Medication (Statins) for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
<80% Compliance at 6 months
|
28 participants
|
32 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: We hypothesized the intervention group would report significantly greater medication compliance than the control group. The level of significance was set to 0.05. The number of participants were set per protocol and we used intention to treat in our protocol and analyses.
* Medication Possession Ratios 6 months post stroke event based upon Pharmacy Refill data * Medication Possession Ratios are the % of days in follow up period of 6 months with possession of hypertension drugs (range = 0-100%) * Compliance is defined as Medication Possession Ratio for Hypertension drugs dichotomized as greater than and equal to 80%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
n=79 Participants
Patient Secondary Stroke Risk Factor Program including Stroke Self Management and Stroke Peer Support
Physician stroke guideline adherence: Provided clinicians with Secondary Stroke Prevention Guidelines/Posted near workstations for Discharge Planning and Provided Clinicians with Seminar on Motivational Interviewing and Goal Setting to Modify Patient Health Behaviors
Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Risk Factor Management: Provided Post Stroke Guidelines on Secondary Prevention to Clinicians Preparing Discharge Plans; Provided Secondary Stroke Self-Management and Stroke Peer Support to Veteran Patients with Stroke/TIA
|
Attention Control Group
n=70 Participants
Received Phone Calls from Staff to Control for Attention
|
|---|---|---|
|
Medication (Hypertension) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
>=80% Compliance at baseline
|
39 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Medication (Hypertension) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
<80% Compliance at baseline
|
40 participants
|
29 participants
|
|
Medication (Hypertension) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
>=80% Compliance at 6 months
|
61 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Medication (Hypertension) Compliance for Secondary Stroke Prevention Risk Factor Management
<80% Compliance at 6 months
|
18 participants
|
22 participants
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1 Stroke Self Management and Risk Factor Program
Attention Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Teresa Damush, Ph.D.
VA Stroke QUERI Center, Roudebush VAMC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place