Study to Evaluate Changes in CD4 on Replacing TDF With ABC or DDI+TDF With ABC+3TC

NCT ID: NCT00338390

Last Updated: 2015-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-04-30

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Different works have shown a high rate of virological failure among patients on abacavir + lamivudine + tenofovir or ddI + 3TC + tenofovir, thus rendering the use of these combinations actively unadvisable.

Furthermore, recent studies have also shown that ABC+3TC are associated with a significantly higher increase in CD4 than the current treatment standard formed by AZT+3TC. This provides us with grounds to suppose that patients with TDF+ddI may recover their CD4 with ABC+3HT. Similarly, and recently, the existence of pharmacokinetic interactions between tenofovir + abacavir has begun to be questioned.

Finally, the replacement of tenofovir with abacavir or tenofovir + ddI with abacavir + lamivudine does not detract from the potency of HAART, the toxicity profile is different and their behaviour at mitochondrial level is similar.

This study aims to ascertain whether the sole replacement of tenofovir with abacavir once a day improves the immunological response obtained with tenofovir + ddI or whether it is better to perform a double replacement of tenofovir and ddI with abacavir + lamivudine (joint formulation) in a single daily dose to achieve these objectives.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Maintain antiretroviral treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

2

Change tenofovir to abacavir and increase didanosine dose to 400 mg/day if weight is \> 60 Kg. or to 250mg/day if weight is \< 60 kg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abacavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Change tenofovir to abacavir

Didanosine

Intervention Type DRUG

Increase didanosine dose to 400 mg/day if weight is \> 60 Kg. or to 250mg/day if weight is \< 60 kg.

3

Change tenofovir and didanosine to abacavir + lamivudine (600mg+300 mg/day in one single tablet).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abacavir+Lamivudine

Intervention Type DRUG

Change tenofovir and didanosine to abacavir + lamivudine (600mg+300 mg/day in one single tablet).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abacavir

Change tenofovir to abacavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Didanosine

Increase didanosine dose to 400 mg/day if weight is \> 60 Kg. or to 250mg/day if weight is \< 60 kg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Abacavir+Lamivudine

Change tenofovir and didanosine to abacavir + lamivudine (600mg+300 mg/day in one single tablet).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

n/h. n/h. n/h.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years.
* HIV-1 infected patients.
* Patients on triple HAART therapy including ddI + tenofovir plus a PI or NNRTI for at least 3 months.
* Patients with an undetectable HIV-1 viral load (\< 50 copies RNA / mL or \< centre's limit of detection) over the last 6 months.
* Not be on treatment with immunosuppressives, such as: hydroxyurea, interferon, ribavirin or cytostatics.
* Not be on treatment with interleukin-2 or other immunomodulators.
* Women may not be of fertile age (defined as at least one year from menopause or undergoing any surgical sterilisation technique), or must undertake to use a barrier contraceptive method during the study.
* Signature of the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Incapacity to give informed consent.
* Bad adherence or treatment interruptions over the previous 6 months.
* Prior exposure to abacavir.
* HAART Therapy including ddI at a dose of 400mg + tenofovir if weight \> 60 kg or ddI 250 mg + tenofovir if weight \< 60 kg.
* Suspicion of cross resistances to abacavir and lamivudine.
* Hepatic or pancreatic analytical alterations 4 times above the limit of normality.
* Presence of opportunistic infections and/or recent tumours (\< 6 months).
* Patients participating in another clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital de Granollers

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Enric Pedrol, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fundació Hospital de Granollers

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Sant Jaume de Calella

Calella, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Mataró

Mataró, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Basurto

Bilbao, Bilabao, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Sierrallana

Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General de Castellón, , Castellón,

Castelló, Castello, Spain

Site Status

H. del S.A.S. Jerez de la Frontera

Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain

Site Status

H. San Fco Borja Gandia

Gandia, Gandia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Cabueñes

Gijón, Gijon, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico San Cecílio

Granada, Granada, Spain

Site Status

Fundació Hospital de Granollers,

Barcelona, Granollers, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arquitecto Marcide

Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Fundación Jiménez Diaz

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen Macarena

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Joan XXIII

Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Xeral de Vigo

Vigo, Vigo, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2004-003749-42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EUROPA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.