Trial Outcomes & Findings for Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Of Pregabalin In Patients With Fibromyalgia. (NCT NCT00333866)

NCT ID: NCT00333866

Last Updated: 2021-02-11

Results Overview

Daily pain diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(no pain) to 10(worst possible pain). Participants rated their pain during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily at awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available pain scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. Final weekly (endpoint) mean pain score is defined as the mean pain score from the last 7 pain diary entries in the study while the participant was on study medication.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

747 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 14

Results posted on

2021-02-11

Participant Flow

Recruitment from 73 centers in North America \[Canada (12) and Mexico (4)\], South America \[Venezuela (3)\], Europe \[Denmark (2), France (5), Germany (5), Italy (6), Netherlands (5), Portugal (4), Spain (4), Sweden (4), Switzerland (3) and United Kingdom(5)\] and Asia \[India (4) and Korea (3)\] and Australia (4).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Overall Study
STARTED
189
187
184
187
Overall Study
TREATED
184
184
182
186
Overall Study
COMPLETED
141
123
133
121
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
48
64
51
66

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
23
37
38
47
Overall Study
Other
3
2
2
2
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
8
6
3
5
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
2
2
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
8
14
4
9
Overall Study
Randomized but not Treated
5
3
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Of Pregabalin In Patients With Fibromyalgia.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=182 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Total
n=736 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=4 Participants
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
167 Participants
n=7 Participants
169 Participants
n=5 Participants
169 Participants
n=4 Participants
673 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
63 Participants
n=21 Participants
Mean Pain Score
6.68 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48 • n=5 Participants
6.76 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 • n=7 Participants
6.57 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31 • n=5 Participants
6.59 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37 • n=4 Participants
6.65 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=21 Participants
Mean Sleep Quality Score
6.01 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.90 • n=5 Participants
5.94 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.70 • n=7 Participants
5.94 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.70 • n=5 Participants
5.91 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.80 • n=4 Participants
5.95 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 • n=21 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using MOS-SS
20.33 Percentage of Participants
n=5 Participants
25.27 Percentage of Participants
n=7 Participants
24.57 Percentage of Participants
n=5 Participants
17.03 Percentage of Participants
n=4 Participants
87.2 Percentage of Participants
n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Sleep Disturbance
60.02 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.60 • n=5 Participants
61.86 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.80 • n=7 Participants
59.59 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.55 • n=5 Participants
60.37 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.09 • n=4 Participants
60.47 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.72 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Snoring
31.05 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.39 • n=5 Participants
32.53 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.82 • n=7 Participants
29.77 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.52 • n=5 Participants
32.09 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.20 • n=4 Participants
31.36 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.94 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Shortness of Breath, Headache
34.18 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.96 • n=5 Participants
36.70 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.01 • n=7 Participants
38.31 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.46 • n=5 Participants
37.07 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.54 • n=4 Participants
36.55 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.97 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Quantity of Sleep
5.47 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=5 Participants
5.59 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66 • n=7 Participants
5.61 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68 • n=5 Participants
5.45 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65 • n=4 Participants
5.53 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Sleep Adequacy
24.70 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.39 • n=5 Participants
24.43 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.80 • n=7 Participants
24.30 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.83 • n=5 Participants
25.03 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.25 • n=4 Participants
24.62 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.79 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Somnolence
41.68 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.78 • n=5 Participants
44.03 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.80 • n=7 Participants
42.37 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.91 • n=5 Participants
42.97 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.92 • n=4 Participants
42.77 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.09 • n=21 Participants
Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Overall Sleep Problem Index
57.46 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.27 • n=5 Participants
59.27 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.24 • n=7 Participants
58.11 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.94 • n=5 Participants
58.05 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.12 • n=4 Participants
58.22 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.38 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Physical Impairment
4.04 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18 • n=5 Participants
3.88 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13 • n=7 Participants
3.87 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12 • n=5 Participants
3.75 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.15 • n=4 Participants
3.88 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Feel Good
7.50 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61 • n=5 Participants
7.46 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77 • n=7 Participants
7.63 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.53 • n=5 Participants
7.77 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.65 • n=4 Participants
7.59 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.64 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Work Missed
3.38 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.34 • n=5 Participants
3.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.18 • n=7 Participants
3.22 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.36 • n=5 Participants
2.86 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99 • n=4 Participants
3.20 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Do Work
6.96 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.24 • n=5 Participants
6.54 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23 • n=7 Participants
6.68 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=5 Participants
6.62 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01 • n=4 Participants
6.70 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Pain
7.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63 • n=5 Participants
7.24 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.48 • n=7 Participants
7.09 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=5 Participants
7.15 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.60 • n=4 Participants
7.21 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Fatigue
7.85 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.84 • n=5 Participants
7.45 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14 • n=7 Participants
7.34 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=5 Participants
7.56 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=4 Participants
7.55 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Rested
7.71 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03 • n=5 Participants
7.61 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.08 • n=7 Participants
7.55 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=5 Participants
7.44 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=4 Participants
7.58 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Stiffness
7.52 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13 • n=5 Participants
7.19 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07 • n=7 Participants
7.03 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=5 Participants
7.28 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.24 • n=4 Participants
7.26 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Anxiety
5.38 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.09 • n=5 Participants
5.27 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.96 • n=7 Participants
5.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.86 • n=5 Participants
5.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.97 • n=4 Participants
5.34 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.97 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores
FIQ Depression
4.85 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.12 • n=5 Participants
4.73 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.93 • n=7 Participants
4.79 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.01 • n=5 Participants
4.65 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.00 • n=4 Participants
4.76 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.01 • n=21 Participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Scores
62.58 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.85 • n=5 Participants
60.75 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.77 • n=7 Participants
60.59 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.59 • n=5 Participants
60.40 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.87 • n=4 Participants
61.08 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.52 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Functioning
42.93 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.04 • n=5 Participants
44.71 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.29 • n=7 Participants
42.52 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.17 • n=5 Participants
43.54 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.39 • n=4 Participants
43.43 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.94 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Role Limitations
37.14 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.75 • n=5 Participants
40.79 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.58 • n=7 Participants
41.44 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.39 • n=5 Participants
39.46 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.71 • n=4 Participants
39.69 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.63 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Emotional Role Limitations
59.61 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.52 • n=5 Participants
60.61 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.23 • n=7 Participants
61.54 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.94 • n=5 Participants
61.31 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.50 • n=4 Participants
60.76 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.25 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Social Functioning
54.44 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.95 • n=5 Participants
56.79 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.00 • n=7 Participants
53.93 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.55 • n=5 Participants
53.70 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.55 • n=4 Participants
54.72 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.24 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Health
56.48 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.68 • n=5 Participants
56.41 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.49 • n=7 Participants
57.56 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.70 • n=5 Participants
56.71 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.39 • n=4 Participants
56.78 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.77 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Bodily Pain
29.28 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.61 • n=5 Participants
28.67 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65 • n=7 Participants
28.30 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.62 • n=5 Participants
28.70 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.20 • n=4 Participants
28.74 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.03 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Vitality
26.46 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76 • n=5 Participants
27.88 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.67 • n=7 Participants
28.78 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.94 • n=5 Participants
27.42 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.14 • n=4 Participants
27.63 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.39 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
General Health Perception
41.65 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.35 • n=5 Participants
42.12 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.24 • n=7 Participants
45.56 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.56 • n=5 Participants
44.58 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.23 • n=4 Participants
43.47 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.63 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Component Score
40.11 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57 • n=5 Participants
40.45 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72 • n=7 Participants
40.79 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15 • n=5 Participants
40.37 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14 • n=4 Participants
40.43 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13 • n=21 Participants
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Component Score
31.87 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.59 • n=5 Participants
32.60 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.43 • n=7 Participants
32.51 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.16 • n=5 Participants
32.42 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.03 • n=4 Participants
32.35 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.55 • n=21 Participants
Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF)
34.89 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52 • n=5 Participants
34.97 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.71 • n=7 Participants
33.98 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.29 • n=5 Participants
34.87 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.70 • n=4 Participants
34.68 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.80 • n=21 Participants
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
HADS Anxiety (HADS-A) Total
8.95 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.52 • n=5 Participants
8.96 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.50 • n=7 Participants
8.75 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.44 • n=5 Participants
8.85 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.58 • n=4 Participants
8.88 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.51 • n=21 Participants
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
HADS Depression (HADS-D) Total
7.83 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17 • n=5 Participants
7.16 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=7 Participants
7.66 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.32 • n=5 Participants
7.39 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.28 • n=4 Participants
7.51 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.20 • n=21 Participants
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores
72.72 millimeter (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.09 • n=5 Participants
72.43 millimeter (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61 • n=7 Participants
70.92 millimeter (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.69 • n=5 Participants
71.43 millimeter (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51 • n=4 Participants
71.88 millimeter (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.72 • n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Daily pain diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(no pain) to 10(worst possible pain). Participants rated their pain during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily at awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available pain scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. Final weekly (endpoint) mean pain score is defined as the mean pain score from the last 7 pain diary entries in the study while the participant was on study medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=181 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (Up to Week 14)
-0.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-1.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-1.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Number of participants with categorical change in overall status. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall status from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=169 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=164 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=165 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=155 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Very much worse
3 participants
5 participants
2 participants
3 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Very much improved
7 participants
13 participants
16 participants
20 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Much improved
43 participants
45 participants
50 participants
46 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Minimally improved
45 participants
50 participants
55 participants
41 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
No change
43 participants
28 participants
27 participants
25 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Minimally worse
11 participants
9 participants
7 participants
10 participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Much worse
17 participants
14 participants
8 participants
10 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Daily quality of sleep diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(best possible sleep) to 10(worst possible sleep). Participants rated their quality of sleep during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily upon awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. The endpoint (up to week 14) mean quality of sleep score was based on Least Squares (LS) Means using ANCOVA, with treatment group and center in the model and the baseline mean sleep score used as the covariate. Final weekly (endpoint) mean sleep quality score is defined as the mean sleep quality score from the last 7 sleep diary entries in the study while the participant was on study medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=181 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality Score at Endpoint (Up to Week 14)
-0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n' participants evaluable at given time point for each group, respectively.

Daily quality of sleep diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(best possible sleep) to 10(worst possible sleep). Participants rated their quality of sleep during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily upon awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. The weekly mean quality of sleep score was based on LS Means using mixed model repeated measures ANCOVA, with treatment, center, week, and treatment-by-week interaction in the model and the baseline mean sleep score used as the covariate. Weekly mean sleep quality score is defined as the mean of the last 7 daily sleep diary entries.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=183 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=179 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=174 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=178 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Overall (n=183,179,174,178)
-0.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-1.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-1.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-2.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 1 (n=183,179,174,178)
-0.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-1.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 2 (n=180,172,168,174)
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-1.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 3 (n=174, 164, 159,163)
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 4 (n=165,157,155,156)
-0.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-2.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 5 (n=163, 150, 152,148)
-0.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 6 (n=159,145,148,144)
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 7 (n=155,140,144,133)
-0.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 8 (n=149,133,142,127)
-0.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 9 (n=146,128,141,126)
-1.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-1.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 10 (n=144,125,139,126)
-1.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 11 (n=143,123,137,121)
-1.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 12 (n=141,121,135,119)
-1.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-2.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 13 (n=140,120,133,118)
-1.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-2.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score
Week 14 (n=134,115,128,111)
-1.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
-1.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-2.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were handled using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no), as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more disturbance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=182 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=182 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=175 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=182 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Percentage of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using MOS-SS
30.8 Percentage of participants
33.5 Percentage of participants
44.0 Percentage of participants
32.4 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were handled using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)=participants evaluable for this measure. 'n'=participants evaluable for specified category for each arm group.

Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no), as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more intensity of attribute.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=183 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=183 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=179 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=185 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Somnolence (n=182,182,177,184)
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.50
0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.49
0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
1.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.49
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Sleep Disturbance (n=183,183,177,185)
-5.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.79
-13.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.78
-19.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.84
-18.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.78
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Snoring (n=172,174,174,177)
-0.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.75
1.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
4.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.75
5.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Shortness of Breath, Headache (n=182,182,177,184)
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
-9.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.91
-12.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.96
-9.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.91
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Quantity of Sleep (n=182,182,175,182)
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Sleep Adequacy (n=183,183,179,185)
7.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.93
10.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
16.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.96
11.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14
Overall Sleep Problem Index (n=181,181,174,184)
-4.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
-9.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
-13.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
-11.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n'=participants evaluable for specified category for each arm group, respectively.

FIQ: 20-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess areas such as health status, progress, and outcomes in participants with fibromyalgia. 11 items related to physical functioning, other items assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. FIQ contains 10 sub-scales scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more impairment in the subscale attribute. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=183 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=179 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Physical Impairment (n=183,184,179,186)
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Feel Good (n=182,184,178,183)
-1.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
-1.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
-1.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
-1.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Work Missed (n=182,181,178,184)
-0.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Do Work (n=182,183,179,185)
-0.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-0.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Pain (n=183,184,179,185)
-0.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
-1.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Fatigue (n=183,184,179,184)
-0.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-0.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Rested (n=183,184,179,185)
-0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
-1.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
-1.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-1.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Stiffness (n=183,184,179,185)
-1.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Anxiety (n=183,184,179,185)
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-1.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14
FIQ Depression (n=181,184,179,184)
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-0.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-1.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

FIQ: 20-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess areas such as health status, progress, and outcomes in participants with fibromyalgia. 11 items related to physical functioning, other items assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. FIQ contains 10 sub-scales scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more impairment in the subscale attribute. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=179 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Scores at Week 14
-6.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
-8.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
-12.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
-8.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0- 100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=178 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Emotional Role Limitations (n=183,183,177,185)
-2.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.94
1.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.93
3.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.98
1.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.93
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Bodily Pain (n=183,184,178,186)
4.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
7.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
10.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
7.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Vitality (n=183,184,178,186)
4.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
4.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
9.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
7.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
General Health Perception (n=183,184,177,186)
0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
2.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
3.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
2.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Mental Component Score (n=182,183,176,184)
-1.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
0.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
2.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.83
1.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Physical Component Score (n=182,183,176,184)
2.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
2.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
3.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
2.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Physical Functioning (n=184,184,177,186)
4.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
6.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
4.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Physical Role Limitations (n=183,183,177,185)
4.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.63
4.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.62
5.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.66
5.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.62
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Social Functioning (n=183,184,178,186)
0.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.77
4.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.76
5.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.81
3.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.76
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14
Mental Health (n=183,184,178,186)
-1.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
1.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
4.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
2.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

MAF is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire that yields a Global Fatigue Index (GFI), measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: degree and severity, amount of distress it causes, its timing and degree to which fatigue interferes with activities of daily living. Only 15 items are used to calculate the GFI. GFI score range from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=183 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=176 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=175 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=181 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) at Week 14
-1.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
-2.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
-3.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
-2.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=182 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=181 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=176 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=185 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 14
HADS Anxiety (HADS-A) Total
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
-0.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
-0.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 14
HADS Depression (HADS-D) Total
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Pain visual analog scale (VAS): Participants assessed the severity of their pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain), measurement on a scale corresponds to the magnitude of their pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=181 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Week 14
-10.30 mm
Standard Error 1.67
-12.86 mm
Standard Error 1.66
-17.75 mm
Standard Error 1.69
-11.74 mm
Standard Error 1.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 14

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of medication compliance. Missing data were imputed using LOCF method. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Acetaminophen (up to 4 gram/day as needed for pain relief) was an allowable concomitant medication as a rescue therapy. The total daily acetaminophen dose taken during double-blind treatment was calculated for each participant as: (total acetaminophen dose during the study) divided by (total number of study days).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=182 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 Participants
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Total Daily Acetaminophen Dose
460.65 mg/day
Standard Error 125.43
449.14 mg/day
Standard Error 124.79
508.53 mg/day
Standard Error 126.71
724.42 mg/day
Standard Error 124.72

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 97 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pregabalin 300 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 137 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pregabalin 450 mg

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 141 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pregabalin 600 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 154 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=184 participants at risk
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=182 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis salmonella
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Drug exposure during pregnancy
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint sprain
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle injury
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular injury
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.54%
1/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=184 participants at risk
Placebo matched to pregabalin capsules orally twice daily up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=184 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 150 milligram (mg) orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily and Day 4 onwards: 150 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 450 mg
n=182 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 225 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12 onwards: 225 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Pregabalin 600 mg
n=186 participants at risk
Pregabalin capsule 300 mg orally twice daily following a 2 week titration phase, Day 1-3: 75 mg orally twice daily, Day 4-8: 150 mg orally twice daily, Day 9-11: 200 mg orally twice daily and Day 12-14: 225 mg orally twice daily and then 300 mg orally twice daily fixed dose up to Week 14.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
2.2%
4/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.1%
13/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
12/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.1%
15/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
0.54%
1/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.9%
9/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.0%
13/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
4.3%
8/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.8%
18/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
12/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.1%
15/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
6.5%
12/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
7/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
8/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
2.2%
4/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.7%
16/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.0%
20/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.8%
20/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
10.9%
20/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
12.0%
22/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
12/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
8.2%
15/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.6%
14/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.3%
26/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.1%
17/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
3.8%
7/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.3%
19/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.2%
15/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.5%
27/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
3.3%
6/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.7%
5/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
7/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.4%
10/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
3.8%
7/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
7/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.5%
10/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
6/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Weight increased
3.3%
6/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.0%
24/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.2%
24/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
12.9%
24/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
4.3%
8/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.4%
10/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.7%
5/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
2.2%
4/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.4%
10/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
12/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.1%
15/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
15.2%
28/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
37.0%
68/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
41.8%
76/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
50.0%
93/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
16.3%
30/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.7%
27/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.7%
25/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.6%
16/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
6.0%
11/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
20.1%
37/184
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.2%
24/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
18.3%
34/186
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Organization: Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of \<60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), \<12 mo from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential info other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER